TED 每個(gè)人都能掌握的記憶技巧(視頻+演講稿)

Feats of memory anyone can do

TED簡(jiǎn)介:有人能在很短時(shí)間內(nèi)背下上千個(gè)數(shù)字,或是記下一疊或更多牌的順序镣衡÷闵荆科技欄作家Joshua Foer給您詳細(xì)講解這種記憶方法 —— 他稱其為"記憶宮殿" —— 并向您證明他的重點(diǎn)是: 任何人都可以擁有絕佳的記憶里纬傲,包括他自己。

演講者:Joshua Foer

片長(zhǎng):20:12


TED 我是如何修復(fù)了我自己的心臟 (眾學(xué)習(xí))_騰訊視頻


英文演講稿

I'd like to invite you to close your eyes.

Imagine yourself standing outside the front door of your home.?I'd like you to notice the color of the door,the material that it's made out of.?Now visualize a pack of overweight nudists on bicycles.

They are competing in a naked bicycle race,?and they are headed straight for your front door.?I need you to actually see this.?They are pedaling really hard, they're sweaty,?they're bouncing around a lot.?And they crash straight into the front door of your home.?Bicycles fly everywhere, wheels roll past you,?spokes end up in awkward places.?Step over the threshold of your door into your foyer, your hallway,?whatever's on the other side,?and appreciate the quality of the light.?The light is shining down on Cookie Monster.Cookie Monster is waving at you from his perch on top of a tan horse.?It's a talking horse.?You can practically feel his blue fur tickling your nose.?You can smell the oatmeal raisin cookie that he's about to shovel into his mouth.?Walk past him.?Walk past him into your living room.?In your living room, in full imaginative broadband,?picture Britney Spears.?She is scantily clad, she's dancing on your coffee table,and she's singing "Hit Me Baby One More Time."?And then, follow me into your kitchen.?In your kitchen, the floor has been paved over with a yellow brick road,?and out of your oven are coming towards you Dorothy, the Tin Man,?the Scarecrow and the Lion from "The Wizard of Oz,"?hand-in-hand, skipping straight towards you.

Okay. Open your eyes.

I want to tell you about a very bizarre contest?that is held every spring in New York City.?It's called the United States Memory Championship.?And I had gone to cover this contest a few years back?as a science journalist,?expecting, I guess, that this was going to be like the Superbowl of savants.?This was a bunch of guys and a few ladies,?widely varying in both age and hygienic upkeep.

They were memorizing hundreds of random numbers,?looking at them just once.?They were memorizing the names of dozens and dozens and dozens of strangers.?They were memorizing entire poems in just a few minutes.?They were competing to see who could memorize?the order of a shuffled pack of playing cards the fastest.?I was like, this is unbelievable.?These people must be freaks of nature.

And I started talking to a few of the competitors.?This is a guy called Ed Cook, who had come over from England,?where he had one of the best-trained memories.?And I said to him, "Ed, when did you realizethat you were a savant?"?And Ed was like, "I'm not a savant.?In fact, I have just an average memory.Everybody who competes in this contest will tell you?that they have just an average memory.?We've all trained ourselves to perform these utterly miraculous feats of memory?using a set of ancient techniques,techniques invented 2,500 years ago in Greece,?the same techniques that Cicero had used to memorize his speeches,?that medieval scholars had used to memorize entire books."?And I said, "Whoa. How come I never heard of this before?"

And we were standing outside the competition hall,?and Ed, who is a wonderful, brilliant, but somewhat eccentric English guy,?says to me, "Josh, you're an American journalist.?Do you know Britney Spears?"I'm like, "What? No. Why?"?"Because I really want to teach Britney Spears?how to memorize the order of a shuffled pack of playing cards?on U.S. national television.?It will prove to the world that anybody can do this."

I was like, "Well, I'm not Britney Spears,?but maybe you could teach me.?I mean, you've got to start somewhere, right?"?And that was the beginning of a very strange journey for me.

I ended up spending the better part of the next year?not only training my memory,?but also investigating it,?trying to understand how it works,?why it sometimes doesn't work,?and what its potential might be.

And I met a host of really interesting people.?This is a guy called E.P.?He's an amnesic who had, very possibly,?the worst memory in the world.?His memory was so bad,?that he didn't even remember he had a memory problem,?which is amazing.?And he was this incredibly tragic figure,?but he was a window into the extent to which our memories make us who we are.

At the other end of the spectrum, I met this guy.?This is Kim Peek, he was the basis for Dustin Hoffman's character?in the movie "Rain Man."?We spent an afternoon together in the Salt Lake City Public Librarymemorizing phone books,?which was scintillating.

And I went back and I read a whole host of memory treatises,?treatises written 2,000-plus years ago in Latin,?in antiquity, and then later, in the Middle Ages.?And I learned a whole bunch of really interesting stuff.?One of the really interesting things that I learned?is that once upon a time,?this idea of having a trained, disciplined, cultivated memory?was not nearly so alien as it would seem to us to be today.?Once upon a time, people invested in their memories,?in laboriously furnishing their minds.

Over the last few millenia,?we've invented a series of technologies —?from the alphabet, to the scroll,?to the codex, the printing press, photography,?the computer, the smartphone —?that have made it progressively easier and easier?for us to externalize our memories,?for us to essentially outsource this fundamental human capacity.?These technologies have made our modern world possible,?but they've also changed us.?They've changed us culturally,?and I would argue that they've changed us cognitively.Having little need to remember anymore,?it sometimes seems like we've forgotten how.

One of the last places on Earth where you still find?people passionate about this idea of a trained, disciplined, cultivated memory,?is at this totally singular memory contest.?It's actually not that singular,there are contests held all over the world.?And I was fascinated, I wanted to know how do these guys do it.

A few years back a group of researchers at University College London?brought a bunch of memory champions into the lab.?They wanted to know:?Do these guys have brains that are somehow structurally,anatomically different from the rest of ours??The answer was no.?Are they smarter than the rest of us?They gave them a bunch of cognitive tests, and the answer was: not really.

There was, however, one really interesting and telling difference?between the brains of the memory champions?and the control subjects that they were comparing them to.?When they put these guys in an fMRI machine,?scanned their brains while they were memorizing numbers?and people's faces and pictures of snowflakes,?they found that the memory champions were lighting up different parts of the brain?than everyone else.?Of note, they were using, or they seemed to be using,?a part of the brain that's involved in spatial memory and navigation.?Why??And is there something that the rest of us can learn from this?

The sport of competitive memorizing is driven by a kind of arms race where,?every year, somebody comes up with a new way to remember more stuff more quickly,?and then the rest of the field has to play catch-up.

This is my friend Ben Pridmore,?three-time world memory champion.?On his desk in front of him are 36 shuffled packs of playing cards?that he is about to try to memorize in one hour,?using a technique that he invented and he alone has mastered.?He used a similar technique?to memorize the precise order of 4,140 random binary digits?in half an hour.

Yeah.And while there are a whole host of ways?of remembering stuff in these competitions,?everything, all of the techniques that are being used,?ultimately come down to a concept?that psychologists refer to as "elaborative encoding."

And it's well-illustrated by a nifty paradox?known as the Baker/baker paradox, which goes like this:?If I tell two people to remember the same word,?if I say to you,?"Remember that there is a guy named Baker."That's his name.?And I say to you, "Remember that there is a guy who is a baker."?Okay??And I come back to you at some point later on,?and I say, "Do you remember that word that I told you a while back?Do you remember what it was?"?The person who was told his name is Baker?is less likely to remember the same word?than the person was told his job is a baker.?Same word, different amount of remembering; that's weird.?What's going on here?

Well, the name Baker doesn't actually mean anything to you.?It is entirely untethered from all of the other memories?floating around in your skull.?But the common noun "baker" — we know bakers.?Bakers wear funny white hats.?Bakers have flour on their hands.?Bakers smell good when they come home from work.Maybe we even know a baker.?And when we first hear that word,?we start putting these associational hooks into it,?that make it easier to fish it back out at some later date.?The entire art of what is going on in these memory contests,?and the entire art of remembering stuff better in everyday life,?is figuring out ways to transform capital B Bakers?into lower-case B bakers —?to take information that is lacking in context,?in significance, in meaning,?and transform it in some way,?so that it becomes meaningful in the light of all the other things?that you have in your mind.

One of the more elaborate techniques for doing this?dates back 2,500 years to Ancient Greece.?It came to be known as the memory palace.?The story behind its creation goes like this:

There was a poet called Simonides, who was attending a banquet.?He was actually the hired entertainment,?because back then, if you wanted to throw a really slamming party,?you didn't hire a D.J., you hired a poet.?And he stands up, delivers his poem from memory, walks out the door,?and at the moment he does,?the banquet hall collapses.?Kills everybody inside.?It doesn't just kill everybody,?it mangles the bodies beyond all recognition.?Nobody can say who was inside,?nobody can say where they were sitting.?The bodies can't be properly buried.?It's one tragedy compounding another.?Simonides, standing outside,?the sole survivor amid the wreckage,?closes his eyes and has this realization,?which is that in his mind's eye,?he can see where each of the guests at the banquet had been sitting.?And he takes the relatives by the hand,?and guides them each to their loved ones amid the wreckage.

What Simonides figured out at that moment,?is something that I think we all kind of intuitively know,which is that, as bad as we are at remembering names and phone numbers,?and word-for-word instructions from our colleagues,?we have really exceptional visual and spatial memories.?If I asked you to recount the first 10 words of the story?that I just told you about Simonides,?chances are you would have a tough time with it.?But, I would wager that if I asked you to recall?who is sitting on top of a talking tan horse?in your foyer right now,?you would be able to see that.

The idea behind the memory palace?is to create this imagined edifice in your mind's eye,?and populate it with images of the things that you want to remember —?the crazier, weirder, more bizarre,?funnier, raunchier, stinkier the image is,?the more unforgettable it's likely to be.?This is advice that goes back 2,000-plus years?to the earliest Latin memory treatises.

So how does this work??Let's say that you've been invited to TED center stage to give a speech,?and you want to do it from memory,?and you want to do it the way that Cicero would have done it,?if he had been invited to TEDxRome 2,000 years ago.

What you might do?is picture yourself at the front door of your house.?And you'd come up with some sort of crazy, ridiculous, unforgettable image,?to remind you that the first thing you want to talk about?is this totally bizarre contest.

And then you'd go inside your house,?and you would see an image of Cookie Monster on top of Mister Ed.?And that would remind you?that you would want to then introduce your friend Ed Cook.?And then you'd see an image of Britney Spears?to remind you of this funny anecdote you want to tell.?And you'd go into your kitchen,?and the fourth topic you were going to talk about?was this strange journey that you went on for a year,?and you'd have some friends to help you remember that.

This is how Roman orators memorized their speeches —?not word-for-word, which is just going to screw you up,?but topic-for-topic.?In fact, the phrase "topic sentence" —?that comes from the Greek word "topos,"?which means "place."?That's a vestige of when people used to think about oratory and rhetoricin these sorts of spatial terms.?The phrase "in the first place,"?that's like "in the first place of your memory palace."

I thought this was just fascinating,?and I got really into it.?And I went to a few more of these memory contests,?and I had this notion that I might write something longer?about this subculture of competitive memorizers.?But there was a problem.?The problem was that a memory contest?is a pathologically boring event.

Truly, it is like a bunch of people sitting around taking the SATs —?I mean, the most dramatic it gets?is when somebody starts massaging their temples.?And I'm a journalist, I need something to write about.?I know that there's incredible stuff happening in these people's minds,?but I don't have access to it.

And I realized, if I was going to tell this story,?I needed to walk in their shoes a little bit.?And so I started trying to spend 15 or 20 minutes?every morning, before I sat down with my New York Times,?just trying to remember something.?Maybe it was a poem,?maybe it was names from an old yearbook that I bought at a flea market.?And I found that this was shockingly fun.?I never would have expected that.?It was fun because this is actually not about training your memory.?What you're doing, is you're trying to get better and better?at creating, at dreaming up,?these utterly ludicrous, raunchy, hilarious,?and hopefully unforgettable images in your mind's eye.?And I got pretty into it.

This is me wearing my standard competitive memorizer's training kit.

It's a pair of earmuffs?and a set of safety goggles that have been masked over?except for two small pinholes,?because distraction is the competitive memorizer's greatest enemy.

I ended up coming back to that same contest?that I had covered a year earlier,?and I had this notion that I might enter it,?sort of as an experiment in participatory journalism.?It'd make, I thought, maybe a nice epilogue to all my research.?Problem was, the experiment went haywire.?I won the contest —which really wasn't supposed to happen.

Now, it is nice to be able to memorize speeches?and phone numbers and shopping lists,?but it's actually kind of beside the point.?These are just tricks.?They work because they're based on some pretty basic principles?about how our brains work.?And you don't have to be building memory palaces?or memorizing packs of playing cards?to benefit from a little bit of insight about how your mind works.

We often talk about people with great memories?as though it were some sort of an innate gift,?but that is not the case.?Great memories are learned.?At the most basic level, we remember when we pay attention.We remember when we are deeply engaged.?We remember when we are able to take a piece of information and experience,?and figure out why it is meaningful to us,?why it is significant, why it's colorful,?when we're able to transform it in some way that makes sense?in the light of all of the other things floating around in our minds,?when we're able to transform Bakers into bakers.

The memory palace, these memory techniques —?they're just shortcuts.?In fact, they're not even really shortcuts.?They work because they make you work.?They force a kind of depth of processing,?a kind of mindfulness,?that most of us don't normally walk around exercising.?But there actually are no shortcuts.This is how stuff is made memorable.

And I think if there's one thing that I want to leave you with,?it's what E.P., the amnesic who couldn't even remember he had a memory problem,?left me with,?which is the notion that our lives are the sum of our memories.?How much are we willing to lose?from our already short lives,?by losing ourselves in our Blackberries, our iPhones,?by not paying attention to the human being across from us?who is talking with us,?by being so lazy that we're not willing to process deeply?

I learned firsthand?that there are incredible memory capacities?latent in all of us.?But if you want to live a memorable life,?you have to be the kind of person?who remembers to remember.

Thank you.(Applause)


最后編輯于
?著作權(quán)歸作者所有,轉(zhuǎn)載或內(nèi)容合作請(qǐng)聯(lián)系作者
  • 序言:七十年代末驮瞧,一起剝皮案震驚了整個(gè)濱河市,隨后出現(xiàn)的幾起案子枯芬,更是在濱河造成了極大的恐慌论笔,老刑警劉巖,帶你破解...
    沈念sama閱讀 206,723評(píng)論 6 481
  • 序言:濱河連續(xù)發(fā)生了三起死亡事件破停,死亡現(xiàn)場(chǎng)離奇詭異翅楼,居然都是意外死亡,警方通過查閱死者的電腦和手機(jī)真慢,發(fā)現(xiàn)死者居然都...
    沈念sama閱讀 88,485評(píng)論 2 382
  • 文/潘曉璐 我一進(jìn)店門毅臊,熙熙樓的掌柜王于貴愁眉苦臉地迎上來,“玉大人黑界,你說我怎么就攤上這事管嬉。” “怎么了朗鸠?”我有些...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 152,998評(píng)論 0 344
  • 文/不壞的土叔 我叫張陵蚯撩,是天一觀的道長(zhǎng)。 經(jīng)常有香客問我烛占,道長(zhǎng)胎挎,這世上最難降的妖魔是什么沟启? 我笑而不...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 55,323評(píng)論 1 279
  • 正文 為了忘掉前任,我火速辦了婚禮犹菇,結(jié)果婚禮上德迹,老公的妹妹穿的比我還像新娘。我一直安慰自己揭芍,他們只是感情好胳搞,可當(dāng)我...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 64,355評(píng)論 5 374
  • 文/花漫 我一把揭開白布。 她就那樣靜靜地躺著称杨,像睡著了一般肌毅。 火紅的嫁衣襯著肌膚如雪。 梳的紋絲不亂的頭發(fā)上姑原,一...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 49,079評(píng)論 1 285
  • 那天悬而,我揣著相機(jī)與錄音,去河邊找鬼页衙。 笑死摊滔,一個(gè)胖子當(dāng)著我的面吹牛,可吹牛的內(nèi)容都是我干的店乐。 我是一名探鬼主播艰躺,決...
    沈念sama閱讀 38,389評(píng)論 3 400
  • 文/蒼蘭香墨 我猛地睜開眼,長(zhǎng)吁一口氣:“原來是場(chǎng)噩夢(mèng)啊……” “哼眨八!你這毒婦竟也來了腺兴?” 一聲冷哼從身側(cè)響起,我...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 37,019評(píng)論 0 259
  • 序言:老撾萬榮一對(duì)情侶失蹤廉侧,失蹤者是張志新(化名)和其女友劉穎页响,沒想到半個(gè)月后,有當(dāng)?shù)厝嗽跇淞掷锇l(fā)現(xiàn)了一具尸體段誊,經(jīng)...
    沈念sama閱讀 43,519評(píng)論 1 300
  • 正文 獨(dú)居荒郊野嶺守林人離奇死亡闰蚕,尸身上長(zhǎng)有42處帶血的膿包…… 初始之章·張勛 以下內(nèi)容為張勛視角 年9月15日...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 35,971評(píng)論 2 325
  • 正文 我和宋清朗相戀三年,在試婚紗的時(shí)候發(fā)現(xiàn)自己被綠了连舍。 大學(xué)時(shí)的朋友給我發(fā)了我未婚夫和他白月光在一起吃飯的照片没陡。...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 38,100評(píng)論 1 333
  • 序言:一個(gè)原本活蹦亂跳的男人離奇死亡,死狀恐怖索赏,靈堂內(nèi)的尸體忽然破棺而出盼玄,到底是詐尸還是另有隱情,我是刑警寧澤潜腻,帶...
    沈念sama閱讀 33,738評(píng)論 4 324
  • 正文 年R本政府宣布埃儿,位于F島的核電站,受9級(jí)特大地震影響融涣,放射性物質(zhì)發(fā)生泄漏童番。R本人自食惡果不足惜精钮,卻給世界環(huán)境...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 39,293評(píng)論 3 307
  • 文/蒙蒙 一、第九天 我趴在偏房一處隱蔽的房頂上張望剃斧。 院中可真熱鬧杂拨,春花似錦、人聲如沸悯衬。這莊子的主人今日做“春日...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 30,289評(píng)論 0 19
  • 文/蒼蘭香墨 我抬頭看了看天上的太陽筋粗。三九已至,卻和暖如春炸渡,著一層夾襖步出監(jiān)牢的瞬間娜亿,已是汗流浹背。 一陣腳步聲響...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 31,517評(píng)論 1 262
  • 我被黑心中介騙來泰國(guó)打工蚌堵, 沒想到剛下飛機(jī)就差點(diǎn)兒被人妖公主榨干…… 1. 我叫王不留买决,地道東北人。 一個(gè)月前我還...
    沈念sama閱讀 45,547評(píng)論 2 354
  • 正文 我出身青樓吼畏,卻偏偏與公主長(zhǎng)得像督赤,于是被迫代替她去往敵國(guó)和親。 傳聞我的和親對(duì)象是個(gè)殘疾皇子泻蚊,可洞房花燭夜當(dāng)晚...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 42,834評(píng)論 2 345

推薦閱讀更多精彩內(nèi)容

  • **2014真題Directions:Read the following text. Choose the be...
    又是夜半驚坐起閱讀 9,399評(píng)論 0 23
  • PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING APPLE DEVELOPER PROGRAM LICENSE...
    念念不忘的閱讀 13,433評(píng)論 5 6
  • tr躲舌,tee 程序的IO 簡(jiǎn)單的說程序由指令(命令)和數(shù)據(jù)(操作對(duì)象)組成,在linux上一切皆文件性雄,程序操作對(duì)象...
    香吉矢閱讀 677評(píng)論 0 1
  • 又是以“很久都沒有發(fā)文了”作為開頭没卸,自己都覺得有點(diǎn)衰。現(xiàn)在想想秒旋,即使我們擁有了手機(jī)玩到根本停不下來约计,下載了一個(gè)寫作...
    purple小姐閱讀 286評(píng)論 0 1
  • 又是一個(gè)早上,莫傷在渡口等待大船渡河迁筛,仍然是熙熙攘攘的人群煤蚌,各種各樣嘈雜的聲音,莫傷突然在人群中看到了那個(gè)刺眼的披...
    雨林木風(fēng)雪閱讀 202評(píng)論 0 0