1. Bicycle-Share System /?
Bike-sharing services? operated by platforms such as Mobike and ofo? have become an effective solution to the "last mile" problem for urban commuters, many of whom? use them to cover the distance between subway station or bus stops and office or home. Bicycles are made available for shared use to individuals on a very short term basis, and for many systems, smartphone mapping apps show nearby stations with available bikes and open docks.
Bike-sharing services have boomed since the middle of last year and swept across country in just a few months.?
Once known as the "Kingdom of Bicycles", China has experience in bicycle management.
Bicycles are the easiest way to get about.
Bike-sharing services can serve people very well, considering that the underground system in this city is still under construction, which has to block many roads and worsen the already terrible traffic. ?So, these bikes are welcome ?to the public considering that it can be very cheap. Furthermore, people are doing exercising while peddling and can make some contribution to environmental This is more like shooting a few birds with one stone. 一箭雙雕
The central concept of these systems is to provide free or affordable access to bicycles for short-distance trips in an urban area as an alternative to motorized public transport or private vehicles, thereby reducing traffic congestion, noise, and air pollution.
It is also in line with the government's philosophy of green, sharing and innovative development.
It would be really nice to see China become a kingdom of bikes again. This will undoubtedly help address the urgent air pollution and meanwhile help improve public health. But still a lot more measures should be taken ?by both the government and public before desirable goals are achieved.
From my personal perspective, it's pretty risky to ride a bike in Chinese cities. Things are probably much better ?in ?some big cities.
The business model of station-less bikes is designed to help urban commuters the "last mile" more effiiently. To protect users' legal interests, ensuring their bikes ?are in satisfactory ?condition is the least ?the bike providers can do.
Apart from building more parking lots and bicycle lanes, the government should also, for instance, ask the bike-sharing operators to record user's irresponsible behavior and deduct points from offenders' personal credit records.
Reports of all kinds bad behavior:
① lock up the bike or take it home 欠动， so that no one else can use them.
②??theft
③ Users illegally parking ；disorderly parking 亂停車
④?A huge number of bikes simply disappear or are badly damaged?
⑤ Some bikes are misused by children
⑥ The bikes are targeted by fraudsters 騙子
⑦ rising maintenance costs
共享單車“讓城市生活更美好”的初衷车胡，已經(jīng)在現(xiàn)實(shí)面前走了樣焕数。運(yùn)營(yíng)商打架，城市遭殃耘分，在政府還沒有出面叫停之前，來(lái)自各方的單車還在源源不斷被投放市場(chǎng)，用以在飽和前夜?fàn)帄Z份額继控，并有演變成新型“城市垃圾”的趨勢(shì)。社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)上胖眷，用戶的質(zhì)疑聲不絕武通。
共享單車帶給交通管理部門最大的煩惱就是亂停亂放，其次沒有進(jìn)行好規(guī)劃珊搀， 對(duì)市容市貌會(huì)有影響冶忱。一位知名的傳統(tǒng)自行車品牌的董事長(zhǎng)認(rèn)為，共享單車是個(gè)好事情境析，但企業(yè)需要考慮社會(huì)責(zé)任囚枪。
