機(jī)器學(xué)習(xí)快速入門2分類的代碼實(shí)現(xiàn)

威斯康星乳腺癌數(shù)據(jù)集

威斯康星乳腺癌（Breast Cancer Wisconsin）數(shù)據(jù)集共包含569個(gè)惡性或者良性腫瘤細(xì)胞樣本论笔。數(shù)據(jù)集的前兩列分別存儲(chǔ)了樣本唯一的ID以及對(duì)樣本的診斷結(jié)果（M代表惡性蘸鲸，B代表良性）祟牲。數(shù)據(jù)集的3～32列包含了30個(gè)從細(xì)胞核照片中提取、用實(shí)數(shù)值標(biāo)識(shí)的特征凌彬，它們可以用于構(gòu)建判定模型淫痰，對(duì)腫瘤是良性還是惡性做出預(yù)測(cè)最楷。威斯康星乳腺癌數(shù)據(jù)集已經(jīng)存儲(chǔ)在UCI機(jī)器學(xué)習(xí)數(shù)據(jù)集庫(kù)中，關(guān)于此數(shù)據(jù)集更多的信息請(qǐng)?jiān)L問鏈接：http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/machine-learning-databases/breast-cancer-wisconsin/

sklearn已經(jīng)包含了該數(shù)據(jù)集待错。

>>> import numpy as np
>>> from sklearn.datasets import load_breast_cancer
>>> data = load_breast_cancer()
>>> print(data)
{'data': array([[1.799e+01, 1.038e+01, 1.228e+02, ..., 2.654e-01, 4.601e-01,
        1.189e-01],
       [2.057e+01, 1.777e+01, 1.329e+02, ..., 1.860e-01, 2.750e-01,
        8.902e-02],
       [1.969e+01, 2.125e+01, 1.300e+02, ..., 2.430e-01, 3.613e-01,
        8.758e-02],
       ...,
       [1.660e+01, 2.808e+01, 1.083e+02, ..., 1.418e-01, 2.218e-01,
        7.820e-02],
       [2.060e+01, 2.933e+01, 1.401e+02, ..., 2.650e-01, 4.087e-01,
        1.240e-01],
       [7.760e+00, 2.454e+01, 4.792e+01, ..., 0.000e+00, 2.871e-01,
        7.039e-02]]), 'target': array([0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1,
       0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
       0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0,
       1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0,
       1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1,
       1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0,
       0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
       1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1,
       1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0,
       0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0,
       1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1,
       1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
       0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1,
       1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
       1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0,
       0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0,
       0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0,
       1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1,
       1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0,
       1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1,
       1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0,
       1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1,
       1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1,
       1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
       1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
       1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]), 'target_names': array(['malignant', 'benign'], dtype='<U9'), 'DESCR': '.. _breast_cancer_dataset:\n\nBreast cancer wisconsin (diagnostic) dataset\n--------------------------------------------\n\n**Data Set Characteristics:**\n\n    :Number of Instances: 569\n\n    :Number of Attributes: 30 numeric, predictive attributes and the class\n\n    :Attribute Information:\n        - radius (mean of distances from center to points on the perimeter)\n        - texture (standard deviation of gray-scale values)\n        - perimeter\n        - area\n        - smoothness (local variation in radius lengths)\n        - compactness (perimeter^2 / area - 1.0)\n        - concavity (severity of concave portions of the contour)\n        - concave points (number of concave portions of the contour)\n        - symmetry \n        - fractal dimension ("coastline approximation" - 1)\n\n        The mean, standard error, and "worst" or largest (mean of the three\n        largest values) of these features were computed for each image,\n        resulting in 30 features.  For instance, field 3 is Mean Radius, field\n        13 is Radius SE, field 23 is Worst Radius.\n\n        - class:\n                - WDBC-Malignant\n                - WDBC-Benign\n\n    :Summary Statistics:\n\n    ===================================== ====== ======\n                                           Min    Max\n    ===================================== ====== ======\n    radius (mean):                        6.981  28.11\n    texture (mean):                       9.71   39.28\n    perimeter (mean):                     43.79  188.5\n    area (mean):                          143.5  2501.0\n    smoothness (mean):                    0.053  0.163\n    compactness (mean):                   0.019  0.345\n    concavity (mean):                     0.0    0.427\n    concave points (mean):                0.0    0.201\n    symmetry (mean):                      0.106  0.304\n    fractal dimension (mean):             0.05   0.097\n    radius (standard error):              0.112  2.873\n    texture (standard error):             0.36   4.885\n    perimeter (standard error):           0.757  21.98\n    area (standard error):                6.802  542.2\n    smoothness (standard error):          0.002  0.031\n    compactness (standard error):         0.002  0.135\n    concavity (standard error):           0.0    0.396\n    concave points (standard error):      0.0    0.053\n    symmetry (standard error):            0.008  0.079\n    fractal dimension (standard error):   0.001  0.03\n    radius (worst):                       7.93   36.04\n    texture (worst):                      12.02  49.54\n    perimeter (worst):                    50.41  251.2\n    area (worst):                         185.2  4254.0\n    smoothness (worst):                   0.071  0.223\n    compactness (worst):                  0.027  1.058\n    concavity (worst):                    0.0    1.252\n    concave points (worst):               0.0    0.291\n    symmetry (worst):                     0.156  0.664\n    fractal dimension (worst):            0.055  0.208\n    ===================================== ====== ======\n\n    :Missing Attribute Values: None\n\n    :Class Distribution: 212 - Malignant, 357 - Benign\n\n    :Creator:  Dr. William H. Wolberg, W. Nick Street, Olvi L. Mangasarian\n\n    :Donor: Nick Street\n\n    :Date: November, 1995\n\nThis is a copy of UCI ML Breast Cancer Wisconsin (Diagnostic) datasets.\nhttps://goo.gl/U2Uwz2\n\nFeatures are computed from a digitized image of a fine needle\naspirate (FNA) of a breast mass.  They describe\ncharacteristics of the cell nuclei present in the image.\n\nSeparating plane described above was obtained using\nMultisurface Method-Tree (MSM-T) [K. P. Bennett, "Decision Tree\nConstruction Via Linear Programming." Proceedings of the 4th\nMidwest Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Society,\npp. 97-101, 1992], a classification method which uses linear\nprogramming to construct a decision tree.  Relevant features\nwere selected using an exhaustive search in the space of 1-4\nfeatures and 1-3 separating planes.\n\nThe actual linear program used to obtain the separating plane\nin the 3-dimensional space is that described in:\n[K. P. Bennett and O. L. Mangasarian: "Robust Linear\nProgramming Discrimination of Two Linearly Inseparable Sets",\nOptimization Methods and Software 1, 1992, 23-34].\n\nThis database is also available through the UW CS ftp server:\n\nftp ftp.cs.wisc.edu\ncd math-prog/cpo-dataset/machine-learn/WDBC/\n\n.. topic:: References\n\n   - W.N. Street, W.H. Wolberg and O.L. Mangasarian. Nuclear feature extraction \n     for breast tumor diagnosis. IS&T/SPIE 1993 International Symposium on \n     Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology, volume 1905, pages 861-870,\n     San Jose, CA, 1993.\n   - O.L. Mangasarian, W.N. Street and W.H. Wolberg. Breast cancer diagnosis and \n     prognosis via linear programming. Operations Research, 43(4), pages 570-577, \n     July-August 1995.\n   - W.H. Wolberg, W.N. Street, and O.L. Mangasarian. Machine learning techniques\n     to diagnose breast cancer from fine-needle aspirates. Cancer Letters 77 (1994) \n     163-171.', 'feature_names': array(['mean radius', 'mean texture', 'mean perimeter', 'mean area',
       'mean smoothness', 'mean compactness', 'mean concavity',
       'mean concave points', 'mean symmetry', 'mean fractal dimension',
       'radius error', 'texture error', 'perimeter error', 'area error',
       'smoothness error', 'compactness error', 'concavity error',
       'concave points error', 'symmetry error',
       'fractal dimension error', 'worst radius', 'worst texture',
       'worst perimeter', 'worst area', 'worst smoothness',
       'worst compactness', 'worst concavity', 'worst concave points',
       'worst symmetry', 'worst fractal dimension'], dtype='<U23'), 'filename': '/usr/local/anaconda3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/sklearn/datasets/data/breast_cancer.csv'}
>>>
>>> print(type(data))
<class 'sklearn.utils.Bunch'>
>>> data.keys()
dict_keys(['data', 'target', 'target_names', 'DESCR', 'feature_names', 'filename'])
>>> data.data
array([[1.799e+01, 1.038e+01, 1.228e+02, ..., 2.654e-01, 4.601e-01,
        1.189e-01],
       [2.057e+01, 1.777e+01, 1.329e+02, ..., 1.860e-01, 2.750e-01,
        8.902e-02],
       [1.969e+01, 2.125e+01, 1.300e+02, ..., 2.430e-01, 3.613e-01,
        8.758e-02],
       ...,
       [1.660e+01, 2.808e+01, 1.083e+02, ..., 1.418e-01, 2.218e-01,
        7.820e-02],
       [2.060e+01, 2.933e+01, 1.401e+02, ..., 2.650e-01, 4.087e-01,
        1.240e-01],
       [7.760e+00, 2.454e+01, 4.792e+01, ..., 0.000e+00, 2.871e-01,
        7.039e-02]])
>>> data.data.shape
(569, 30)
>>> data.target
array([0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1,
       0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
       0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0,
       1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0,
       1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1,
       1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0,
       0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
       1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1,
       1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0,
       0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0,
       1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1,
       1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
       0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1,
       1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
       1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0,
       0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0,
       0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0,
       1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1,
       1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0,
       1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1,
       1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0,
       1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1,
       1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1,
       1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
       1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
       1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1])
>>> data.target_names
array(['malignant', 'benign'], dtype='<U9')
>>> data.target.shape
(569,)
>>> data.feature_names
array(['mean radius', 'mean texture', 'mean perimeter', 'mean area',
       'mean smoothness', 'mean compactness', 'mean concavity',
       'mean concave points', 'mean symmetry', 'mean fractal dimension',
       'radius error', 'texture error', 'perimeter error', 'area error',
       'smoothness error', 'compactness error', 'concavity error',
       'concave points error', 'symmetry error',
       'fractal dimension error', 'worst radius', 'worst texture',
       'worst perimeter', 'worst area', 'worst smoothness',
       'worst compactness', 'worst concavity', 'worst concave points',
       'worst symmetry', 'worst fractal dimension'], dtype='<U23')

參考資料

技術(shù)支持qq群630011153 144081101
本文最新版本地址 https://china-testing.github.io/ml_quick1.html
本文涉及的python測(cè)試開發(fā)庫(kù) 謝謝點(diǎn)贊籽孙！
本文相關(guān)海量書籍下載
2018最佳人工智能機(jī)器學(xué)習(xí)工具書及下載(持續(xù)更新)
本教程視頻介紹 https://itbooks.pipipan.com/fs/18113597-367675945
入門教材 https://itbooks.pipipan.com/fs/18113597-314076882
本教程目錄 https://china-testing.github.io/ml_quick.html

構(gòu)建模型進(jìn)行預(yù)測(cè)

from sklearn.datasets import load_breast_cancer
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.neural_network import MLPClassifier
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler

data = load_breast_cancer()

# split the data into train and test sets
# this lets us simulate how our model will perform in the future
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(data.data, data.target, test_size=0.33)

model = RandomForestClassifier()
model.fit(X_train, y_train)

# evaluate the model's performance
print(model.score(X_train, y_train))
print(model.score(X_test, y_test))

# how you can make predictions
predictions = model.predict(X_test)

# what did we get?
print(predictions)

# manually check the accuracy of your predictions
N = len(y_test)
print(np.sum(predictions == y_test) / N)# can also just call np.mean()


scaler = StandardScaler()
X_train2 = scaler.fit_transform(X_train)
X_test2 = scaler.transform(X_test)

model = MLPClassifier(max_iter=500)
model.fit(X_train2, y_train)


# evaluate the model's performance
print(model.score(X_train2, y_train))
print(model.score(X_test2, y_test))

最后編輯于：2019.04.23 14:44:36

?著作權(quán)歸作者所有,轉(zhuǎn)載或內(nèi)容合作請(qǐng)聯(lián)系作者

人面猴
序言：七十年代末，一起剝皮案震驚了整個(gè)濱河市火俄，隨后出現(xiàn)的幾起案子犯建，更是在濱河造成了極大的恐慌，老刑警劉巖瓜客，帶你破解...
沈念sama閱讀 211,042評(píng)論 6贊 490
死咒
序言：濱河連續(xù)發(fā)生了三起死亡事件适瓦，死亡現(xiàn)場(chǎng)離奇詭異，居然都是意外死亡忆家，警方通過查閱死者的電腦和手機(jī)犹菇，發(fā)現(xiàn)死者居然都...
沈念sama閱讀 89,996評(píng)論 2贊 384
救了他兩次的神仙讓他今天三更去死
文/潘曉璐我一進(jìn)店門，熙熙樓的掌柜王于貴愁眉苦臉地迎上來芽卿，“玉大人揭芍，你說我怎么就攤上這事⌒独” “怎么了称杨？”我有些...
開封第一講書人閱讀 156,674評(píng)論 0贊 345
道士緝兇錄：失蹤的賣姜人
文/不壞的土叔我叫張陵，是天一觀的道長(zhǎng)筷转。經(jīng)常有香客問我姑原，道長(zhǎng)，這世上最難降的妖魔是什么呜舒？我笑而不...
開封第一講書人閱讀 56,340評(píng)論 1贊 283
?港島之戀（遺憾婚禮）
正文為了忘掉前任锭汛，我火速辦了婚禮，結(jié)果婚禮上袭蝗，老公的妹妹穿的比我還像新娘唤殴。我一直安慰自己，他們只是感情好到腥，可當(dāng)我...
茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 65,404評(píng)論 5贊 384
惡毒庶女頂嫁案：這布局不是一般人想出來的
文/花漫我一把揭開白布朵逝。她就那樣靜靜地躺著，像睡著了一般乡范。火紅的嫁衣襯著肌膚如雪配名。梳的紋絲不亂的頭發(fā)上啤咽，一...
開封第一講書人閱讀 49,749評(píng)論 1贊 289
城市分裂傳說
那天，我揣著相機(jī)與錄音渠脉，去河邊找鬼宇整。笑死，一個(gè)胖子當(dāng)著我的面吹牛芋膘，可吹牛的內(nèi)容都是我干的没陡。我是一名探鬼主播，決...
沈念sama閱讀 38,902評(píng)論 3贊 405
雙鴛鴦連環(huán)套：你想象不到人心有多黑
文/蒼蘭香墨我猛地睜開眼索赏，長(zhǎng)吁一口氣：“原來是場(chǎng)噩夢(mèng)啊……” “哼！你這毒婦竟也來了贴彼？” 一聲冷哼從身側(cè)響起潜腻，我...
開封第一講書人閱讀 37,662評(píng)論 0贊 266
萬榮殺人案實(shí)錄
序言：老撾萬榮一對(duì)情侶失蹤，失蹤者是張志新（化名）和其女友劉穎器仗，沒想到半個(gè)月后融涣，有當(dāng)?shù)厝嗽跇淞掷锇l(fā)現(xiàn)了一具尸體，經(jīng)...
沈念sama閱讀 44,110評(píng)論 1贊 303
?護(hù)林員之死
正文獨(dú)居荒郊野嶺守林人離奇死亡精钮，尸身上長(zhǎng)有42處帶血的膿包…… 初始之章·張勛以下內(nèi)容為張勛視角年9月15日...
茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 36,451評(píng)論 2贊 325
?白月光啟示錄
正文我和宋清朗相戀三年威鹿，在試婚紗的時(shí)候發(fā)現(xiàn)自己被綠了。大學(xué)時(shí)的朋友給我發(fā)了我未婚夫和他白月光在一起吃飯的照片轨香。...
茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 38,577評(píng)論 1贊 340
活死人
序言：一個(gè)原本活蹦亂跳的男人離奇死亡忽你，死狀恐怖，靈堂內(nèi)的尸體忽然破棺而出臂容，到底是詐尸還是另有隱情科雳，我是刑警寧澤，帶...
沈念sama閱讀 34,258評(píng)論 4贊 328
?日本核電站爆炸內(nèi)幕
正文年R本政府宣布脓杉，位于F島的核電站糟秘，受9級(jí)特大地震影響，放射性物質(zhì)發(fā)生泄漏球散。R本人自食惡果不足惜尿赚，卻給世界環(huán)境...
茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 39,848評(píng)論 3贊 312
男人毒藥：我在死后第九天來索命
文/蒙蒙一、第九天我趴在偏房一處隱蔽的房頂上張望蕉堰。院中可真熱鬧凌净，春花似錦、人聲如沸嘁灯。這莊子的主人今日做“春日...
開封第一講書人閱讀 30,726評(píng)論 0贊 21
一樁弒父案，背后竟有這般陰謀
文/蒼蘭香墨我抬頭看了看天上的太陽(yáng)丑婿。三九已至性雄，卻和暖如春没卸，著一層夾襖步出監(jiān)牢的瞬間，已是汗流浹背秒旋。一陣腳步聲響...
開封第一講書人閱讀 31,952評(píng)論 1贊 264
情欲美人皮
我被黑心中介騙來泰國(guó)打工约计，沒想到剛下飛機(jī)就差點(diǎn)兒被人妖公主榨干…… 1. 我叫王不留，地道東北人迁筛。一個(gè)月前我還...
沈念sama閱讀 46,271評(píng)論 2贊 360
代替公主和親
正文我出身青樓煤蚌，卻偏偏與公主長(zhǎng)得像，于是被迫代替她去往敵國(guó)和親细卧。傳聞我的和親對(duì)象是個(gè)殘疾皇子尉桩，可洞房花燭夜當(dāng)晚...
茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 43,452評(píng)論 2贊 348