1. TinkerInstaller # install()
TinkerInstaller主要提供了兩個(gè)install()方法魏铅,一個(gè)簡(jiǎn)單的袁翁,另一個(gè)復(fù)雜一點(diǎn)的適用于需要自定義更多功能的滋恬。
1-1 多參數(shù)的install()
先看這個(gè)多參數(shù)的install()蝌戒,主要:
- 使用傳入?yún)?shù)構(gòu)建了一個(gè)Tinker對(duì)象卵史,Tinker使用了構(gòu)建者模式案站。
- 調(diào)用了Tinker的create()和install()继准。
public static Tinker install(ApplicationLike applicationLike, LoadReporter loadReporter, PatchReporter patchReporter,
PatchListener listener, Class<? extends AbstractResultService> resultServiceClass, AbstractPatch upgradePatchProcessor) {
Tinker tinker = new Tinker.Builder(applicationLike.getApplication())
.tinkerFlags(applicationLike.getTinkerFlags())
.loadReport(loadReporter)
.listener(listener)
.patchReporter(patchReporter)
.tinkerLoadVerifyFlag(applicationLike.getTinkerLoadVerifyFlag()).build();
Tinker.create(tinker);
tinker.install(applicationLike.getTinkerResultIntent(), resultServiceClass, upgradePatchProcessor);
return tinker;
}
1-2 單參數(shù)的install()
單參數(shù)的install()也是相同的枉证,只是構(gòu)建Tinker對(duì)象時(shí)沒有設(shè)置那些傳入的參數(shù)。
public static Tinker install(ApplicationLike applicationLike) {
Tinker tinker = new Tinker.Builder(applicationLike.getApplication()).build();
Tinker.create(tinker);
tinker.install(applicationLike.getTinkerResultIntent());
return tinker;
}
這里就能看出來TinkerInstaller是一個(gè)外觀模式移必,并沒有執(zhí)行初始化的工作室谚,真正工作的是Tinker類,所以我們來看Tinker避凝。
1-3 Tinker的單例模式
Tinker類是一個(gè)單例舞萄,用得是DCL,沒有處理DCL失效問題管削,可能是因?yàn)榘l(fā)生的概率太小了且處理會(huì)讓效率降低倒脓。最后是用Builder去構(gòu)造對(duì)象,使用了構(gòu)建者模式含思,Builder是Tinker內(nèi)部類崎弃,去管理Tinker的參數(shù)甘晤。
public static Tinker with(Context context) {
if (!sInstalled) {
throw new TinkerRuntimeException("you must install tinker before get tinker sInstance");
}
if (sInstance == null) {
synchronized (Tinker.class) {
if (sInstance == null) {
sInstance = new Builder(context).build();
}
}
}
return sInstance;
}
Builder在Tinker的內(nèi)部,統(tǒng)一管理了一些參數(shù)饲做,包括多參數(shù)install()傳入的Reporter和Listener等线婚。
private final Context context;
private final boolean mainProcess;
private final boolean patchProcess;
private int status = -1;
private LoadReporter loadReporter;
private PatchReporter patchReporter;
private PatchListener listener;
private File patchDirectory;
private File patchInfoFile;
private File patchInfoLockFile;
private Boolean tinkerLoadVerifyFlag;
1-4 Builder的構(gòu)造器
在構(gòu)造方法中會(huì)先初始化一些,主要是context所在線程的判斷和各種目錄的初始盆均。
public Builder(Context context) {
if (context == null) {
throw new TinkerRuntimeException("Context must not be null.");
}
this.context = context;
this.mainProcess = TinkerServiceInternals.isInMainProcess(context);
this.patchProcess = TinkerServiceInternals.isInTinkerPatchServiceProcess(context);
this.patchDirectory = SharePatchFileUtil.getPatchDirectory(context);
if (this.patchDirectory == null) {
TinkerLog.e(TAG, "patchDirectory is null!");
return;
}
this.patchInfoFile = SharePatchFileUtil.getPatchInfoFile(patchDirectory.getAbsolutePath());
this.patchInfoLockFile = SharePatchFileUtil.getPatchInfoLockFile(patchDirectory.getAbsolutePath());
TinkerLog.w(TAG, "tinker patch directory: %s", patchDirectory);
}
1-5 Builder # patchReporter()
之后就是構(gòu)建者模式塞弊,提供了一系列設(shè)置參數(shù)的方法。比如這個(gè)設(shè)置patchReporter的方法泪姨。設(shè)置的方法不要多次調(diào)用游沿,并不會(huì)覆蓋掉之前的設(shè)置,只會(huì)拋已經(jīng)設(shè)置過的異常肮砾。
public Builder patchReporter(PatchReporter patchReporter) {
if (patchReporter == null) {
throw new TinkerRuntimeException("patchReporter must not be null.");
}
if (this.patchReporter != null) {
throw new TinkerRuntimeException("patchReporter is already set.");
}
this.patchReporter = patchReporter;
return this;
}
1-6 Builder # build()
在build()中會(huì)判空诀黍,如果是之前還沒有初始賦值的參數(shù),就賦默認(rèn)值仗处。最后調(diào)用Tinker構(gòu)造器傳入初始化的參數(shù)創(chuàng)建Tinker對(duì)象并返回眯勾。
public Tinker build() {
if (status == -1) {
status = ShareConstants.TINKER_ENABLE_ALL;
}
// 如果調(diào)用的是但參數(shù)的install()就會(huì)在這里賦默認(rèn)值
if (loadReporter == null) {
loadReporter = new DefaultLoadReporter(context);
}
if (patchReporter == null) {
patchReporter = new DefaultPatchReporter(context);
}
if (listener == null) {
listener = new DefaultPatchListener(context);
}
if (tinkerLoadVerifyFlag == null) {
tinkerLoadVerifyFlag = false;
}
return new Tinker(context, status, loadReporter, patchReporter, listener, patchDirectory,
patchInfoFile, patchInfoLockFile, mainProcess, patchProcess, tinkerLoadVerifyFlag);
}
1-7 Tinker # create()
回到1-2,Tinker對(duì)象初始化好后傳入Tinker的create()婆誓,來看create()吃环。這個(gè)方法就是賦值單例sInstance。
public static void create(Tinker tinker) {
if (sInstance != null) {
throw new TinkerRuntimeException("Tinker instance is already set.");
}
sInstance = tinker;
}
1-8 Tinker # install()
1-2在調(diào)用完create()后就會(huì)調(diào)用install()旷档,Tinker的install()也有兩個(gè)模叙,單參數(shù)的TinkerInstaller#install()調(diào)用單參數(shù)的install(),多參數(shù)的調(diào)用多參數(shù)的鞋屈,單參數(shù)也是調(diào)用多參數(shù)的install(),后面兩個(gè)參數(shù)就生成默認(rèn)對(duì)象傳入了故觅。
public void install(Intent intentResult) {
install(intentResult, DefaultTinkerResultService.class, new UpgradePatch());
}
再看多參數(shù)的install()厂庇,它完成真正install的邏輯。主要工作:
- 置標(biāo)記sInstalled為true输吏。
- 將兩個(gè)參數(shù)注入到TinkerPatchService中权旷。
- 初始化TinkerLoadResult,調(diào)用onLoadResult()贯溅。
public void install(Intent intentResult, Class<? extends AbstractResultService> serviceClass,
AbstractPatch upgradePatch) {
sInstalled = true;
TinkerPatchService.setPatchProcessor(upgradePatch, serviceClass);
TinkerLog.i(TAG, "try to install tinker, isEnable: %b, version: %s", isTinkerEnabled(), ShareConstants.TINKER_VERSION);
if (!isTinkerEnabled()) {
TinkerLog.e(TAG, "tinker is disabled");
return;
}
if (intentResult == null) {
throw new TinkerRuntimeException("intentResult must not be null.");
}
tinkerLoadResult = new TinkerLoadResult();
tinkerLoadResult.parseTinkerResult(getContext(), intentResult);
//after load code set
loadReporter.onLoadResult(patchDirectory, tinkerLoadResult.loadCode, tinkerLoadResult.costTime);
if (!loaded) {
TinkerLog.w(TAG, "tinker load fail!");
}
}
2. TinkerInstaller # onReceiveUpgradePatch()
同樣因?yàn)橥庥^模式拄氯,所以TinkerInstaller沒有任何處理,直接交給Tinker對(duì)象中已經(jīng)初始化好的PatchListener的onPatchReceived()處理它浅。
public static void onReceiveUpgradePatch(Context context, String patchLocation) {
Tinker.with(context).getPatchListener().onPatchReceived(patchLocation);
}
2-1 PatchListener # onPatchReceived()
PatchListener是一個(gè)接口译柏,只有一個(gè)onPatchReceived()接口方法。DefaultPatchListener是PatchListener實(shí)現(xiàn)類姐霍。
public interface PatchListener {
int onPatchReceived(String path);
}
2-2 DefaultPatchListener # onPatchReceived()
可以自己去實(shí)現(xiàn)PatchListener鄙麦,但總歸需要處理的工作是相似的典唇。我們看一個(gè)默認(rèn)實(shí)現(xiàn),DefaultPatchListener胯府。在onPatchReceived()方法里:
- 調(diào)用patchCheck()對(duì)patch文件進(jìn)行一系列的安全性檢查介衔,去重寫這個(gè)方法也就可以實(shí)現(xiàn)自己的檢查邏輯了。
- 如果檢查是安全地就開啟TinkerPatchService骂因,開始合并補(bǔ)丁包炎咖。
- 如果檢查沒通過就調(diào)用LoadReporter的相關(guān)方法通知。
@Override
public int onPatchReceived(String path) {
File patchFile = new File(path);
int returnCode = patchCheck(path, SharePatchFileUtil.getMD5(patchFile));
if (returnCode == ShareConstants.ERROR_PATCH_OK) {
TinkerPatchService.runPatchService(context, path);
} else {
Tinker.with(context).getLoadReporter().onLoadPatchListenerReceiveFail(new File(path), returnCode);
}
return returnCode;
}
到這里中心就要轉(zhuǎn)去TinkerPatchService了寒波。
總結(jié)一下:
- TinkerInstaller使用了外觀模式乘盼,沒有真正邏輯處理,只是封裝了Tinker的各種調(diào)用影所,真正處理的邏輯在Tinker中蹦肴。
- Tinker使用了單例模式(DCL) + 構(gòu)建者模式。
- TinkerInstaller提供了兩個(gè)api:
- install()用來創(chuàng)建并初始化Tinker對(duì)象猴娩,并調(diào)用了Tinker對(duì)象的create()和install()阴幌。
- onReceiveUpgradePatch()中調(diào)用了Tinker對(duì)象中PatchListener的onPatchReceived()。
- Tinker的install()中也初始了TinkerPatchService卷中,為后面做準(zhǔn)備矛双。
- PatchListener的onPatchReceived()用來檢查patch文件合法性并開啟執(zhí)行修復(fù)工作的TinkerPatchService。
3. TinkerPatchService
TinkerPatchService就是加載合并patch文件的Service蟆豫,繼承了IntentService议忽。
3-1 TinkerPatchService # setPatchProcessor()
回顧一下Tinker的install(),在install()中就傳入了兩個(gè)參數(shù)調(diào)用了setPatchProcessor()十减。再追溯參數(shù)來源其實(shí)是在我們自己編寫代碼調(diào)用TinkerInstaller的復(fù)雜install()傳入的或是調(diào)用簡(jiǎn)單install()時(shí)Tinker的Builder為我們默認(rèn)創(chuàng)建的栈幸。
多參數(shù)的源頭:
// 回顧我們自己編寫的代碼,調(diào)用 TinkerInstaller#install()帮辟。
// 最終最后兩個(gè)參數(shù)被注入到TinkerPatchService中速址。
AbstractPatch upgradePatchProcessor = new UpgradePatch();
TinkerInstaller.install(mAppLike, loadReporter,
patchReporter, mPatchListener,
CustomResultService.class,// 決定在patch文件安裝完畢后的操作
upgradePatchProcessor// 決定patch文件的安裝策略
);// 復(fù)雜的初始化方法
單參數(shù)的源頭:
// Tinker # install()
public void install(Intent intentResult) {
// 傳入的是為我們默認(rèn)實(shí)例的對(duì)象。
install(intentResult, DefaultTinkerResultService.class, new UpgradePatch());
}
一直傳遞到setPatchProcessor()由驹,最后向TinkerPatchService注入了這兩個(gè)對(duì)象芍锚。
- upgradePatch是我們直接創(chuàng)建的UpgradePatch()對(duì)象,表示patch文件的安裝策略蔓榄。
- serviceClass是我們自定義的DefaultTinkerResultService類并炮,表示修復(fù)完畢后的動(dòng)作。
public static void setPatchProcessor(AbstractPatch upgradePatch, Class<? extends AbstractResultService> serviceClass) {
upgradePatchProcessor = upgradePatch;
resultServiceClass = serviceClass;
//try to load
try {
Class.forName(serviceClass.getName());
} catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
3-2 TinkerPatchService # runPatchService()
接著上面看一下runPatchService()甥郑,就是啟動(dòng)TinkerPatchService的代碼逃魄,intent中還傳了一個(gè)patch文件路徑path和一個(gè)在Tinker#install()中傳入的一個(gè)ResultService類名。
public static void runPatchService(Context context, String path) {
try {
Intent intent = new Intent(context, TinkerPatchService.class);
intent.putExtra(PATCH_PATH_EXTRA, path);
intent.putExtra(RESULT_CLASS_EXTRA, resultServiceClass.getName());
context.startService(intent);
} catch (Throwable throwable) {
TinkerLog.e(TAG, "start patch service fail, exception:" + throwable);
}
}
3-3 TinkerPatchService # onHandleIntent()
- 在這個(gè)方法中最重要的就是調(diào)用了tryPatch()壹若,也就是更近一步的修復(fù)邏輯嗅钻,因?yàn)閛nHandleIntent()是支持耗時(shí)操作的皂冰,所以完全可以猜想tryPatch()是同步方法。
- 其次重要就是在處理完tryPatch()之后會(huì)開啟ResultService养篓,執(zhí)行修復(fù)完畢后的工作秃流。
@Override
protected void onHandleIntent(Intent intent) {
final Context context = getApplicationContext();
Tinker tinker = Tinker.with(context);
// PatchReporter回調(diào)
tinker.getPatchReporter().onPatchServiceStart(intent);
// ...一些異常判斷處理...
// 提升進(jìn)程優(yōu)先級(jí),盡可能保證此Service不被kill
increasingPriority();
PatchResult patchResult = new PatchResult();
try {
if (upgradePatchProcessor == null) {
throw new TinkerRuntimeException("upgradePatchProcessor is null.");
}
// 核心調(diào)用tryPatch()
result = upgradePatchProcessor.tryPatch(context, path, patchResult);
} catch (Throwable throwable) {
e = throwable;
result = false;
// PatchReporter回調(diào)
tinker.getPatchReporter().onPatchException(patchFile, e);
}
cost = SystemClock.elapsedRealtime() - begin;
// PatchReporter回調(diào)
tinker.getPatchReporter().onPatchResult(patchFile, result, cost);
patchResult.isSuccess = result;
patchResult.rawPatchFilePath = path;
patchResult.costTime = cost;
patchResult.e = e;
// 開始執(zhí)行ResultService柳弄,執(zhí)行修復(fù)完畢后的工作
AbstractResultService.runResultService(context, patchResult, getPatchResultExtra(intent));
}
3-4 TinkerPatchService # increasingPriority()
在說兩個(gè)核心過程之前先來看這個(gè)方法舶胀,這個(gè)方法在tryPatch()之前被調(diào)用,主要是利用系統(tǒng)漏洞讓Service優(yōu)先級(jí)高一些避免輕易被回收碧注。
private void increasingPriority() {
TinkerLog.i(TAG, "try to increase patch process priority");
try {
Notification notification = new Notification();
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT < 18) {
startForeground(notificationId, notification);
} else {
startForeground(notificationId, notification);
// start InnerService
startService(new Intent(this, InnerService.class));
}
} catch (Throwable e) {
TinkerLog.i(TAG, "try to increase patch process priority error:" + e);
}
}
public static class InnerService extends Service {
@Override
public void onCreate() {
super.onCreate();
try {
startForeground(notificationId, new Notification());
} catch (Throwable e) {
TinkerLog.e(TAG, "InnerService set service for push exception:%s.", e);
}
// kill
stopSelf();
}
@Override
public void onDestroy() {
stopForeground(true);
super.onDestroy();
}
@Override
public IBinder onBind(Intent intent) {
return null;
}
}
4. UpgradePatch # tryPatch()
在上面分析的TinkerPatchService#onHanleIntent():
result = upgradePatchProcessor.tryPatch(context, path, patchResult);
4-1 AbstractPatch
upgradePatchProcessor是AbstractPatch類的嚣伐,只有一個(gè)抽象方法tryPatch()。
public abstract class AbstractPatch {
public abstract boolean tryPatch(Context context, String tempPatchPath, PatchResult patchResult);
}
upgradePatchProcessor是AbstractPatch的實(shí)例對(duì)象萍丐,在Tinker的install()調(diào)用時(shí)傳入轩端,也就是多參數(shù)TinkerInstaller的install()傳入的,實(shí)現(xiàn)類是UpgradePatch逝变,看tryPatch()實(shí)現(xiàn)基茵,真的是非常長(zhǎng),我們分成兩個(gè)部分來看壳影,顯示檢查再是算法調(diào)用拱层。
4-2 UpgradePatch # tryPatch()中的檢查邏輯
tryPatch()的返回值便是合成Patch成功與否,在方法的開始都是一些判斷宴咧,對(duì)Tinker的檢查根灯、文件的檢查、簽名檢查掺栅、TinkerId檢查烙肺、文件md5檢查等,一旦檢查不安全就直接返回false氧卧。
@Override
public boolean tryPatch(Context context, String tempPatchPath, PatchResult patchResult) {
Tinker manager = Tinker.with(context);
final File patchFile = new File(tempPatchPath);
// 檢查Tinker參數(shù)和SharedPreferences是否可用
if (!manager.isTinkerEnabled() || !ShareTinkerInternals.isTinkerEnableWithSharedPreferences(context)) {
TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:patch is disabled, just return");
return false;
}
// 判斷patch存在茬高、可讀、是文件假抄、大小大于0
if (!SharePatchFileUtil.isLegalFile(patchFile)) {
TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:patch file is not found, just return");
return false;
}
//check the signature, we should create a new checker
ShareSecurityCheck signatureCheck = new ShareSecurityCheck(context);
// 解壓patch去檢查簽名、TinkerId丽猬、和patch壓縮包中文件全不全
int returnCode = ShareTinkerInternals.checkTinkerPackage(context, manager.getTinkerFlags(), patchFile, signatureCheck);
if (returnCode != ShareConstants.ERROR_PACKAGE_CHECK_OK) {
TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:onPatchPackageCheckFail");
manager.getPatchReporter().onPatchPackageCheckFail(patchFile, returnCode);
return false;
}
// 獲取patch的md5
String patchMd5 = SharePatchFileUtil.getMD5(patchFile);
if (patchMd5 == null) {
TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:patch md5 is null, just return");
return false;
}
//use md5 as version
// 存patch文件的md5
patchResult.patchVersion = patchMd5;
TinkerLog.i(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:patchMd5:%s", patchMd5);
//check ok, we can real recover a new patch
// 從緩存之前存過的取文件信息
final String patchDirectory = manager.getPatchDirectory().getAbsolutePath();
File patchInfoLockFile = SharePatchFileUtil.getPatchInfoLockFile(patchDirectory);
File patchInfoFile = SharePatchFileUtil.getPatchInfoFile(patchDirectory);
// 看之前是不是有patch
SharePatchInfo oldInfo = SharePatchInfo.readAndCheckPropertyWithLock(patchInfoFile, patchInfoLockFile);
//it is a new patch, so we should not find a exist
SharePatchInfo newInfo;
//already have patch
// 構(gòu)建newInfo
if (oldInfo != null) {
// 如果有就檢查信息全不全
if (oldInfo.oldVersion == null || oldInfo.newVersion == null || oldInfo.oatDir == null) {
TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:onPatchInfoCorrupted");
manager.getPatchReporter().onPatchInfoCorrupted(patchFile, oldInfo.oldVersion, oldInfo.newVersion);
return false;
}
// 檢查md5不空且長(zhǎng)度正確
if (!SharePatchFileUtil.checkIfMd5Valid(patchMd5)) {
TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:onPatchVersionCheckFail md5 %s is valid", patchMd5);
manager.getPatchReporter().onPatchVersionCheckFail(patchFile, oldInfo, patchMd5);
return false;
}
// if it is interpret now, use changing flag to wait main process
final String finalOatDir = oldInfo.oatDir.equals(ShareConstants.INTERPRET_DEX_OPTIMIZE_PATH)
? ShareConstants.CHANING_DEX_OPTIMIZE_PATH : oldInfo.oatDir;
newInfo = new SharePatchInfo(oldInfo.oldVersion, patchMd5, Build.FINGERPRINT, finalOatDir);
} else {
newInfo = new SharePatchInfo("", patchMd5, Build.FINGERPRINT, ShareConstants.DEFAULT_DEX_OPTIMIZE_PATH);
}
// ......
//copy file
File destPatchFile = new File(patchVersionDirectory + "/" + SharePatchFileUtil.getPatchVersionFile(patchMd5));
try {
// check md5 first
if (!patchMd5.equals(SharePatchFileUtil.getMD5(destPatchFile))) {
// 檢查md5正確后拷貝文件宿饱,因?yàn)楹竺娌僮骺赡軙?huì)發(fā)生以外而刪除patch文件。
// 所以在這里拷貝一份脚祟,后面的操作對(duì)拷貝的patch來操作谬以。
SharePatchFileUtil.copyFileUsingStream(patchFile, destPatchFile);
TinkerLog.w(TAG, "UpgradePatch copy patch file, src file: %s size: %d, dest file: %s size:%d", patchFile.getAbsolutePath(), patchFile.lengt
destPatchFile.getAbsolutePath(), destPatchFile.length());
}
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:copy patch file fail from %s to %s", patchFile.getPath(), destPatchFile.getPath());
manager.getPatchReporter().onPatchTypeExtractFail(patchFile, destPatchFile, patchFile.getName(), ShareConstants.TYPE_PATCH_FILE);
return false;
}
// ......檢查成功的后序合并算法調(diào)用
}
4-3 UpgradePatch # tryPatch()中合并算法的調(diào)用
在通過了這一系列檢查之后就到了真正合并文件算法的時(shí)候了,合并的文件分為三種:dex文件由桌、.so文件和資源文件分別對(duì)應(yīng)下面三個(gè)調(diào)用为黎,只要一個(gè)修復(fù)工作失敗了邮丰,就返回false,修復(fù)算法我們?cè)谙乱黄治觥?/p>
@Override
public boolean tryPatch(Context context, String tempPatchPath, PatchResult patchResult) {
// ......一系列檢查工作
//we use destPatchFile instead of patchFile, because patchFile may be deleted during the patch process
if (!DexDiffPatchInternal.tryRecoverDexFiles(manager, signatureCheck, context, patchVersionDirectory, destPatchFile)) {
TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:new patch recover, try patch dex failed");
return false;
}
if (!BsDiffPatchInternal.tryRecoverLibraryFiles(manager, signatureCheck, context, patchVersionDirectory, destPatchFile)) {
TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:new patch recover, try patch library failed");
return false;
}
if (!ResDiffPatchInternal.tryRecoverResourceFiles(manager, signatureCheck, context, patchVersionDirectory, destPatchFile)) {
TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:new patch recover, try patch resource failed");
return false;
}
// check dex opt file at last, some phone such as VIVO/OPPO like to change dex2oat to interpreted
if (!DexDiffPatchInternal.waitAndCheckDexOptFile(patchFile, manager)) {
TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:new patch recover, check dex opt file failed");
return false;
}
// ......寫新的合并Patch信息
}
5. AbstractResultService
回顧3-3铭乾,在tryPatch()調(diào)用完成后剪廉,最后一句:
AbstractResultService.runResultService(context, patchResult, getPatchResultExtra(intent));
開啟了修復(fù)完成后的工作Service,DefaultTinkerResultService是默認(rèn)實(shí)現(xiàn)炕檩,或者也可以自定義斗蒋,在TinkerInstaller#install()傳入。
5-1 AbstractResultService # runResultService()
resultServiceClass是一路傳遞過來的類名笛质,到這里就是啟動(dòng)了泉沾,默認(rèn)給的是DefaultTinkerResultService
public static void runResultService(Context context, PatchResult result, String resultServiceClass) {
if (resultServiceClass == null) {
throw new TinkerRuntimeException("resultServiceClass is null.");
}
try {
Intent intent = new Intent();
intent.setClassName(context, resultServiceClass);
intent.putExtra(RESULT_EXTRA, result);
context.startService(intent);
} catch (Throwable throwable) {
TinkerLog.e(TAG, "run result service fail, exception:" + throwable);
}
}
5-2 DefaultTinkerResultService # onHandleIntent()
DefaultTinkerResultService沒有重寫該方法,父類實(shí)現(xiàn)直接調(diào)用的onPatchResult()
@Override
protected void onHandleIntent(Intent intent) {
if (intent == null) {
TinkerLog.e(TAG, "AbstractResultService received a null intent, ignoring.");
return;
}
PatchResult result = (PatchResult) ShareIntentUtil.getSerializableExtra(intent, RESULT_EXTRA);
onPatchResult(result);
}
5-3 DefaultTinkerResultService # onPatchResult()
首先會(huì)關(guān)閉PatchService妇押,然后刪除patch文件跷究,最后將應(yīng)用進(jìn)程殺死,再開就生效了敲霍。但是這樣的體驗(yàn)不好俊马,所以如果想要自己的邏輯,就可以自定義DefaultTinkerResultService色冀,重寫onPatchService()潭袱。
@Override
public void onPatchResult(PatchResult result) {
// ......一些判斷和日志打印
//first, we want to kill the recover process
// 關(guān)閉TinkerPatchService
TinkerServiceInternals.killTinkerPatchServiceProcess(getApplicationContext());
// if success and newPatch, it is nice to delete the raw file, and restart at once
// only main process can load an upgrade patch!
if (result.isSuccess) {
// 如果修復(fù)成功了,就把patch刪掉
deleteRawPatchFile(new File(result.rawPatchFilePath));
if (checkIfNeedKill(result)) {
// 這就是為什么不自定義ResultService時(shí)锋恬,修復(fù)完成應(yīng)用會(huì)閃退
android.os.Process.killProcess(android.os.Process.myPid());
} else {
TinkerLog.i(TAG, "I have already install the newly patch version!");
}
}
}
到這里整個(gè)流程就結(jié)束了屯换,默認(rèn)的話此時(shí)進(jìn)程已被殺死,再次啟動(dòng)才能夠生效与学。就再分析分析啟動(dòng)過程中發(fā)生的事情彤悔。