前言
之前寫項目的時候山孔,對于數(shù)據(jù)庫的操作不是特別多,能避免就盡量避免荷憋,并且一直想不到比較好的方法去組織網(wǎng)絡(luò)數(shù)據(jù)台颠、本地數(shù)據(jù)的邏輯。所以在最近的面試中時勒庄,問及項目中的數(shù)據(jù)庫實現(xiàn)串前,以及比較好用的數(shù)據(jù)庫的框架及其實現(xiàn)原理時,我就只答道之前在《第一行代碼》中看到了的LitePal实蔽,但源碼就...所以這次來惡補(bǔ)一次數(shù)據(jù)庫荡碾。幾經(jīng)搜索,云比較盐须,比較青睞官方Jetpack組件中的Room玩荠。
Room簡介
Room框架是使用生成代碼的方式在編譯時生成CRUD的代碼,因此性能是遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)好過通過反射實現(xiàn)的ORM框架贼邓。但是事實上阶冈,Room最吸引我的地方不止是性能,Room對架構(gòu)組件(LiveData)塑径、RxJava等流行框架做了適配女坑。例如,Room中的查詢操作可以返回一個LiveData<XXX>统舀,并且匆骗,每一次RUD操作劳景,都會更新LiveData。這可以大大簡化本地碉就、內(nèi)存盟广、網(wǎng)絡(luò)多級緩存的實現(xiàn),具體官方也給出了一系列Demo瓮钥,并且隨時都在隨著框架或者根據(jù)PR更新筋量,強(qiáng)烈推薦研究這些Demo!
注
本文主要是對Room中與LiveData的聯(lián)動作出分析碉熄,閱讀本文前建議先熟悉Room的基本使用桨武,建議看一下與LiveData配合使用的Demo。
正文
創(chuàng)建相關(guān)類
AppDatabase.kt
@Database(entities = [Book::class], version = 1)
abstract class AppDatabase : RoomDatabase() {
abstract fun bookDao(): BookDao
}
Book.kt
@Dao
interface BookDao {
@Insert
fun insert(book: Book): Long
@Delete
fun delete(book: Book)
@Query("select * from book where id = :id")
fun queryById(id: Long): LiveData<Book>
}
使用數(shù)據(jù)庫:
val db = Room.databaseBuilder(applicationContext, AppDatabase::class.java, "test.db")
.build()
db.bookDao().queryById(1).observe(this, Observer {
// do something when book update
})
這樣在Observer里面就可以接收到任何時候數(shù)據(jù)庫id=1的數(shù)據(jù)修改操作了锈津。
生成代碼并分析
Build -> Make Project 編譯呀酸,會生成Room相關(guān)代碼,如果是kapt的話琼梆,生成代碼目錄應(yīng)該是{項目目錄}/app/build/generated/source/kapt/debug/{包路徑}/下性誉。
我們可以看到生成了AppDatabase_Impl和BookDao_Impl兩個代碼文件,分別對應(yīng)前面貼出來的AppDatabase的實現(xiàn)類和BookDao的實現(xiàn)類茎杂。
AppDatabase_Impl則是表的創(chuàng)建艾栋、刪除相關(guān)代碼,Dao則是具體表的CRUD操作蛉顽。這里我們重點關(guān)系生成的查詢方法。
BookDao_Impl#
@Override
public LiveData<Book> queryById(final long id) {
final String _sql = "select * from book where id = ?";
final RoomSQLiteQuery _statement = RoomSQLiteQuery.acquire(_sql, 1);
int _argIndex = 1;
_statement.bindLong(_argIndex, id);
return __db.getInvalidationTracker().createLiveData(new String[]{"book"}, new Callable<Book>() {
@Override
public Book call() throws Exception {
final Cursor _cursor = DBUtil.query(__db, _statement, false);
try {
final int _cursorIndexOfId = CursorUtil.getColumnIndexOrThrow(_cursor, "id");
final int _cursorIndexOfName = CursorUtil.getColumnIndexOrThrow(_cursor, "name");
final int _cursorIndexOfAuthor = CursorUtil.getColumnIndexOrThrow(_cursor, "author");
final int _cursorIndexOfPrice = CursorUtil.getColumnIndexOrThrow(_cursor, "price");
final Book _result;
if (_cursor.moveToFirst()) {
final long _tmpId;
_tmpId = _cursor.getLong(_cursorIndexOfId);
final String _tmpName;
_tmpName = _cursor.getString(_cursorIndexOfName);
final String _tmpAuthor;
_tmpAuthor = _cursor.getString(_cursorIndexOfAuthor);
final float _tmpPrice;
_tmpPrice = _cursor.getFloat(_cursorIndexOfPrice);
_result = new Book(_tmpId, _tmpName, _tmpAuthor, _tmpPrice);
} else {
_result = null;
}
return _result;
} finally {
_cursor.close();
}
}
@Override
protected void finalize() {
_statement.release();
}
});
}
注意這一行
return __db.getInvalidationTracker().createLiveData(...);
我們跟進(jìn)去先较,最終創(chuàng)建的是一個RoomTrackingLiveData携冤,是一個繼承了LiveData的類。下面是它的構(gòu)造方法闲勺。從構(gòu)造方法來看曾棕,比較可疑的對象的是InvalidationTracker.Observer這個類,并且實現(xiàn)十有八九是觀察者模式菜循。而最后的回調(diào)也多半是onInvalidated方法翘地。
@SuppressLint("RestrictedApi")
RoomTrackingLiveData(
RoomDatabase database,
InvalidationLiveDataContainer container,
Callable<T> computeFunction,
String[] tableNames) {
mDatabase = database;
mComputeFunction = computeFunction;
mContainer = container;
mObserver = new InvalidationTracker.Observer(tableNames) {
@Override
public void onInvalidated(@NonNull Set<String> tables) {
ArchTaskExecutor.getInstance().executeOnMainThread(mInvalidationRunnable);
}
};
}
而在RoomTrackingLiveData中,重寫了onActive方法癌幕。其中mContainer是InvalidationLiveDataContainer衙耕,文檔上有寫僅僅是維護(hù)LiveData的強(qiáng)引用,防止正在使用的LiveData被回收勺远,跟本文目標(biāo)沒關(guān)系橙喘,可忽略。而后面的就有意思了胶逢,通過Excutor執(zhí)行了一個任務(wù)厅瞎,所以饰潜,我們來看一下這個任務(wù)把。
@Override
protected void onActive() {
super.onActive();
mContainer.onActive(this);
mDatabase.getQueryExecutor().execute(mRefreshRunnable);
}
mRefreshRunnable#run()
// mRegisteredObserver是否注冊的標(biāo)志
if (mRegisteredObserver.compareAndSet(false, true)) {
mDatabase.getInvalidationTracker().addWeakObserver(mObserver);
}
boolean computed;
do {
computed = false;
if (mComputing.compareAndSet(false, true)) {
try {
T value = null;
while (mInvalid.compareAndSet(true, false)) {
computed = true;
try {
// Dao實現(xiàn)類中返回LiveData時傳入的一個參數(shù)和簸,用于查詢彭雾,并將數(shù)據(jù)組裝成一個實體類
value = mComputeFunction.call();
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException("Exception while computing database"
+ " live data.", e);
}
}
if (computed) {
postValue(value);
}
} finally {
mComputing.set(false);
}
}
} while (computed && mInvalid.get());
這段代碼后段通過CAS去完成一次數(shù)據(jù)庫的查詢,組裝成實體類并postValue锁保,即更新LiveData薯酝。
注意到這個代碼前段調(diào)用了InvalidationTracker的addWeakObserver,這個方法就應(yīng)該就是訂閱了身诺。
InvalidationTracker#addWeakObserver
public void addWeakObserver(Observer observer) {
addObserver(new WeakObserver(this, observer));
}
InvalidationTracker#addObserver
public void addObserver(@NonNull Observer observer) {
final String[] tableNames = resolveViews(observer.mTables);
int[] tableIds = new int[tableNames.length];
final int size = tableNames.length;
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
Integer tableId = mTableIdLookup.get(tableNames[i].toLowerCase(Locale.US));
if (tableId == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("There is no table with name " + tableNames[i]);
}
tableIds[i] = tableId;
}
ObserverWrapper wrapper = new ObserverWrapper(observer, tableIds, tableNames);
ObserverWrapper currentObserver;
synchronized (mObserverMap) {
currentObserver = mObserverMap.putIfAbsent(observer, wrapper);
}
if (currentObserver == null && mObservedTableTracker.onAdded(tableIds)) {
syncTriggers();
}
}
InvalidationTracker$WeakObserver
static class WeakObserver extends Observer {
final InvalidationTracker mTracker;
final WeakReference<Observer> mDelegateRef;
WeakObserver(InvalidationTracker tracker, Observer delegate) {
super(delegate.mTables);
mTracker = tracker;
mDelegateRef = new WeakReference<>(delegate);
}
@Override
public void onInvalidated(@NonNull Set<String> tables) {
final Observer observer = mDelegateRef.get();
if (observer == null) {
mTracker.removeObserver(this);
} else {
observer.onInvalidated(tables);
}
}
}
可以看到蜜托,WeakObserver就是對Observer一個弱引用的包裝。而在addObserver中霉赡,根據(jù)observer中tableNames橄务,對更新了InvalidationTracker的訂閱記錄。添加成功后穴亏,最后會調(diào)用onAdded蜂挪。
boolean onAdded(int... tableIds) {
boolean needTriggerSync = false;
synchronized (this) {
for (int tableId : tableIds) {
final long prevObserverCount = mTableObservers[tableId];
mTableObservers[tableId] = prevObserverCount + 1;
if (prevObserverCount == 0) {
mNeedsSync = true;
needTriggerSync = true;
}
}
}
return needTriggerSync;
}
這里mTableObservers是對每個table的observer進(jìn)行計數(shù)。為什么要計數(shù)呢嗓化?我們接著看棠涮。在發(fā)現(xiàn)了訂閱數(shù)從0->1的table時,這個方法會返回true刺覆,如果它返回true严肪,會執(zhí)行syncTriggers()方法,經(jīng)過調(diào)用會執(zhí)行這一段代碼:
final int[] tablesToSync = mObservedTableTracker.getTablesToSync();
if (tablesToSync == null) {
return;
}
final int limit = tablesToSync.length;
try {
database.beginTransaction();
for (int tableId = 0; tableId < limit; tableId++) {
switch (tablesToSync[tableId]) {
case ObservedTableTracker.ADD:
startTrackingTable(database, tableId);
break;
case ObservedTableTracker.REMOVE:
stopTrackingTable(database, tableId);
break;
}
}
database.setTransactionSuccessful();
} finally {
database.endTransaction();
}
InvalidationTracker#getTablesToSync()
int[] getTablesToSync() {
synchronized (this) {
if (!mNeedsSync || mPendingSync) {
return null;
}
final int tableCount = mTableObservers.length;
for (int i = 0; i < tableCount; i++) {
final boolean newState = mTableObservers[i] > 0;
if (newState != mTriggerStates[i]) {
mTriggerStateChanges[i] = newState ? ADD : REMOVE;
} else {
mTriggerStateChanges[i] = NO_OP;
}
mTriggerStates[i] = newState;
}
mPendingSync = true;
mNeedsSync = false;
return mTriggerStateChanges;
}
}
這個getTablesToSync方法很短谦屑,但這里就體現(xiàn)了observer計數(shù)的作用驳糯,它遍歷這個表,找出計數(shù)與之前不一樣的氢橙,如果由一個大于0的數(shù)變?yōu)?>0酝枢,表明現(xiàn)在沒有observer訂閱它,返回REMOVE悍手,0->n帘睦,返回ADD,否則NO_OP坦康。對于返回ADD的表竣付,就應(yīng)該是會監(jiān)聽變化的表了。它會執(zhí)行startTrackingTable方法涝焙。
private void startTrackingTable(SupportSQLiteDatabase writableDb, int tableId) {
final String tableName = mTableNames[tableId];
StringBuilder stringBuilder = new StringBuilder();
for (String trigger : TRIGGERS) {
stringBuilder.setLength(0);
stringBuilder.append("CREATE TEMP TRIGGER IF NOT EXISTS ");
appendTriggerName(stringBuilder, tableName, trigger);
stringBuilder.append(" AFTER ")
.append(trigger)
.append(" ON `")
.append(tableName)
.append("` BEGIN INSERT OR REPLACE INTO ")
.append(UPDATE_TABLE_NAME)
.append(" VALUES(null, ")
.append(tableId)
.append("); END");
writableDb.execSQL(stringBuilder.toString());
}
}
到這里我們就很清楚了:實現(xiàn)監(jiān)聽修改的方法是觸發(fā)器卑笨。 (不過我之前僅僅是聽說過觸發(fā)器,很少用過仑撞,如果不了解赤兴,這里有一份簡易的教程)妖滔。而觸發(fā)器關(guān)心的操作是這一些:
private static final String[] TRIGGERS = new String[]{"UPDATE", "DELETE", "INSERT"};
對應(yīng)著更新、刪除桶良、插入座舍。當(dāng)有這些操作時,根據(jù)上述觸發(fā)器語句陨帆,會更新一個由InvalidationTracker維護(hù)的表"UPDATE_TABLE_NAME"曲秉。
InvalidationTracker#UPDATE_TABLE_NAME
private static final String UPDATE_TABLE_NAME = "room_table_modification_log";
InvalidationTracker#internalInit
void internalInit(SupportSQLiteDatabase database) {
synchronized (this) {
if (mInitialized) {
Log.e(Room.LOG_TAG, "Invalidation tracker is initialized twice :/.");
return;
}
database.beginTransaction();
try {
database.execSQL("PRAGMA temp_store = MEMORY;");
database.execSQL("PRAGMA recursive_triggers='ON';");
database.execSQL(CREATE_TRACKING_TABLE_SQL);
database.setTransactionSuccessful();
} finally {
database.endTransaction();
}
syncTriggers(database);
mCleanupStatement = database.compileStatement(RESET_UPDATED_TABLES_SQL);
mInitialized = true;
}
}
注意到表中有這樣一列:
INVALIDATED_COLUMN_NAME + " INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 0
在觸發(fā)器設(shè)置的是更新操作時會被設(shè)置為1。所以疲牵,應(yīng)該就是檢驗這個值來判斷表是否有更新承二。那么是哪里進(jìn)行判斷呢?我們可以從一個更新操作開始找纲爸,例如BookDao_Impl#insert()
@Override
public long insert(final Book book) {
__db.beginTransaction();
try {
long _result = __insertionAdapterOfBook.insertAndReturnId(book);
__db.setTransactionSuccessful();
return _result;
} finally {
__db.endTransaction();
}
}
最后發(fā)現(xiàn)在endTransaction中調(diào)用了InvalidationTracker的refreshVersionsAsync方法亥鸠。而在這個方法中,最終會運行InvalidationTracker的mRefreshRunnable對象的run方法识啦。(注意负蚊,和上文的mRefreshRunnbale屬于不同類,不是同一個對象颓哮。)
RoomDatabase#endTransaction()
public void endTransaction() {
mOpenHelper.getWritableDatabase().endTransaction();
if (!inTransaction()) {
// enqueue refresh only if we are NOT in a transaction. Otherwise, wait for the last
// endTransaction call to do it.
mInvalidationTracker.refreshVersionsAsync();
}
}
InvalidationTracker#mRefreshRunnable#run()
inal Lock closeLock = mDatabase.getCloseLock();
boolean hasUpdatedTable = false;
try {
... 省略
if (mDatabase.mWriteAheadLoggingEnabled) {
// This transaction has to be on the underlying DB rather than the RoomDatabase
// in order to avoid a recursive loop after endTransaction.
SupportSQLiteDatabase db = mDatabase.getOpenHelper().getWritableDatabase();
db.beginTransaction();
try {
hasUpdatedTable = checkUpdatedTable();
db.setTransactionSuccessful();
} finally {
db.endTransaction();
}
} else {
hasUpdatedTable = checkUpdatedTable();
}
} catch (IllegalStateException | SQLiteException exception) {
// may happen if db is closed. just log.
Log.e(Room.LOG_TAG, "Cannot run invalidation tracker. Is the db closed?",
exception);
} finally {
closeLock.unlock();
}
if (hasUpdatedTable) {
// 分發(fā)給Observer家妆,最終會更新LiveData
synchronized (mObserverMap) {
for (Map.Entry<Observer, ObserverWrapper> entry : mObserverMap) {
entry.getValue().notifyByTableVersions(mTableInvalidStatus);
}
}
// Reset invalidated status flags.
mTableInvalidStatus.clear();
}
注意,hasUpdatedTable = checkUpdatedTable();
private boolean checkUpdatedTable() {
boolean hasUpdatedTable = false;
Cursor cursor = mDatabase.query(new SimpleSQLiteQuery(SELECT_UPDATED_TABLES_SQL));
//noinspection TryFinallyCanBeTryWithResources
try {
while (cursor.moveToNext()) {
final int tableId = cursor.getInt(0);
mTableInvalidStatus.set(tableId);
hasUpdatedTable = true;
}
} finally {
cursor.close();
}
if (hasUpdatedTable) {
mCleanupStatement.executeUpdateDelete();
}
return hasUpdatedTable;
}
@VisibleForTesting
static final String SELECT_UPDATED_TABLES_SQL = "SELECT * FROM " + UPDATE_TABLE_NAME
+ " WHERE " + INVALIDATED_COLUMN_NAME + " = 1;";
果然冕茅,是查找"UPDATE_TABLE_NAME"這個表中"INVALIDATED_COLUMN_NAME"這列為1的記錄伤极,然后設(shè)置自己的狀態(tài)。完成這個過程就分發(fā)給自己的Observers姨伤。
void notifyByTableVersions(BitSet tableInvalidStatus) {
...
if (invalidatedTables != null) {
mObserver.onInvalidated(invalidatedTables);
}
}
而在前文中有說到塑荒,注冊的Observer實際上是RoomTrackingLiveData的mObserver的包裝,最終會調(diào)用到它的onInvalidated姜挺。
mObserver = new InvalidationTracker.Observer(tableNames) {
@Override
public void onInvalidated(@NonNull Set<String> tables) {
ArchTaskExecutor.getInstance().executeOnMainThread(mInvalidationRunnable);
}
}
final Runnable mInvalidationRunnable = new Runnable() {
@MainThread
@Override
public void run() {
boolean isActive = hasActiveObservers();
if (mInvalid.compareAndSet(false, true)) {
if (isActive) {
mDatabase.getQueryExecutor().execute(mRefreshRunnable);
}
}
}
};
可見,最后會在線程池中執(zhí)行RoomTrackingLiveData的mRefreshRunnable任務(wù)彼硫。這個任務(wù)前文已經(jīng)分析過了炊豪,通過CAS的方式查詢數(shù)據(jù),并post給LiveData拧篮,這樣就實現(xiàn)了數(shù)據(jù)更新的通知词渤。到這里,Room和LiveData聯(lián)動的工作原理就大致分析完畢串绩。