Resilience4j
簡介
Resilience4j是一款輕量級(jí)佃扼,易于使用的容錯(cuò)庫拆融,其靈感來自于Netflix Hystrix,但是專為Java 8和函數(shù)式編程而設(shè)計(jì)。輕量級(jí),因?yàn)閹熘皇褂昧?strong>Vavr敞贡,它沒有任何其他外部依賴下。相比之下,Netflix Hystrix對Archaius具有編譯依賴性嗤堰,Archaius具有更多的外部庫依賴性,例如Guava和Apache Commons Configuration。
要使用Resilience4j踢匣,不需要引入所有依賴告匠,只需要選擇你需要的。
Resilience4j提供了以下的核心模塊和拓展模塊:
核心模塊:
- resilience4j-circuitbreaker: Circuit breaking
- resilience4j-ratelimiter: Rate limiting
- resilience4j-bulkhead: Bulkheading
- resilience4j-retry: Automatic retrying (sync and async)
- resilience4j-cache: Result caching
- resilience4j-timelimiter: Timeout handling
Circuitbreaker
簡介
CircuitBreaker通過具有三種正常狀態(tài)的有限狀態(tài)機(jī)實(shí)現(xiàn):CLOSED离唬,OPEN和HALF_OPEN以及兩個(gè)特殊狀態(tài)DISABLED和FORCED_OPEN后专。當(dāng)熔斷器關(guān)閉時(shí),所有的請求都會(huì)通過熔斷器输莺。如果失敗率超過設(shè)定的閾值戚哎,熔斷器就會(huì)從關(guān)閉狀態(tài)轉(zhuǎn)換到打開狀態(tài),這時(shí)所有的請求都會(huì)被拒絕嫂用。當(dāng)經(jīng)過一段時(shí)間后型凳,熔斷器會(huì)從打開狀態(tài)轉(zhuǎn)換到半開狀態(tài),這時(shí)僅有一定數(shù)量的請求會(huì)被放入嘱函,并重新計(jì)算失敗率甘畅,如果失敗率超過閾值,則變?yōu)榇蜷_狀態(tài)往弓,如果失敗率低于閾值疏唾,則變?yōu)殛P(guān)閉狀態(tài)。
Resilience4j記錄請求狀態(tài)的數(shù)據(jù)結(jié)構(gòu)和Hystrix不同函似,Hystrix是使用滑動(dòng)窗口來進(jìn)行存儲(chǔ)的槐脏,而Resilience4j采用的是Ring Bit Buffer(環(huán)形緩沖區(qū))。Ring Bit Buffer在內(nèi)部使用BitSet這樣的數(shù)據(jù)結(jié)構(gòu)來進(jìn)行存儲(chǔ)撇寞,BitSet的結(jié)構(gòu)如下圖所示:
每一次請求的成功或失敗狀態(tài)只占用一個(gè)bit位顿天,與boolean數(shù)組相比更節(jié)省內(nèi)存。BitSet使用long[]數(shù)組來存儲(chǔ)這些數(shù)據(jù)重抖,意味著16個(gè)值(64bit)的數(shù)組可以存儲(chǔ)1024個(gè)調(diào)用狀態(tài)露氮。
計(jì)算失敗率需要填滿環(huán)形緩沖區(qū)。例如钟沛,如果環(huán)形緩沖區(qū)的大小為10畔规,則必須至少請求滿10次,才會(huì)進(jìn)行故障率的計(jì)算恨统,如果僅僅請求了9次叁扫,即使9個(gè)請求都失敗,熔斷器也不會(huì)打開畜埋。但是CLOSE狀態(tài)下的緩沖區(qū)大小設(shè)置為10并不意味著只會(huì)進(jìn)入10個(gè) 請求莫绣,在熔斷器打開之前的所有請求都會(huì)被放入。
當(dāng)故障率高于設(shè)定的閾值時(shí)悠鞍,熔斷器狀態(tài)會(huì)從由CLOSE變?yōu)?strong>OPEN对室。這時(shí)所有的請求都會(huì)拋出CallNotPermittedException異常。當(dāng)經(jīng)過一段時(shí)間后,熔斷器的狀態(tài)會(huì)從OPEN變?yōu)?strong>HALF_OPEN掩宜,HALF_OPEN狀態(tài)下同樣會(huì)有一個(gè)Ring Bit Buffer蔫骂,用來計(jì)算HALF_OPEN狀態(tài)下的故障率,如果高于配置的閾值牺汤,會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)換為OPEN辽旋,低于閾值則裝換為CLOSE。與CLOSE狀態(tài)下的緩沖區(qū)不同的地方在于檐迟,HALF_OPEN狀態(tài)下的緩沖區(qū)大小會(huì)限制請求數(shù)补胚,只有緩沖區(qū)大小的請求數(shù)會(huì)被放入。
除此以外追迟,熔斷器還會(huì)有兩種特殊狀態(tài):DISABLED(始終允許訪問)和FORCED_OPEN(始終拒絕訪問)溶其。這兩個(gè)狀態(tài)不會(huì)生成熔斷器事件(除狀態(tài)裝換外),并且不會(huì)記錄事件的成功或者失敗敦间。退出這兩個(gè)狀態(tài)的唯一方法是觸發(fā)狀態(tài)轉(zhuǎn)換或者重置熔斷器握联。
熔斷器關(guān)于線程安全的保證措施有以下幾個(gè)部分:
- 熔斷器的狀態(tài)使用AtomicReference保存的
- 更新熔斷器狀態(tài)是通過無狀態(tài)的函數(shù)或者原子操作進(jìn)行的
- 更新事件的狀態(tài)用synchronized關(guān)鍵字保護(hù)
意味著同一時(shí)間只有一個(gè)線程能夠修改熔斷器狀態(tài)或者記錄事件的狀態(tài)。
可配置參數(shù)
配置參數(shù) | 默認(rèn)值 | 描述 |
---|---|---|
failureRateThreshold | 50 | 熔斷器關(guān)閉狀態(tài)和半開狀態(tài)使用的同一個(gè)失敗率閾值 |
ringBufferSizeInHalfOpenState | 10 | 熔斷器半開狀態(tài)的緩沖區(qū)大小每瞒,會(huì)限制線程的并發(fā)量,例如緩沖區(qū)為10則每次只會(huì)允許10個(gè)請求調(diào)用后端服務(wù) |
ringBufferSizeInClosedState | 100 | 熔斷器關(guān)閉狀態(tài)的緩沖區(qū)大小纯露,不會(huì)限制線程的并發(fā)量剿骨,在熔斷器發(fā)生狀態(tài)轉(zhuǎn)換前所有請求都會(huì)調(diào)用后端服務(wù) |
waitDurationInOpenState | 60(s) | 熔斷器從打開狀態(tài)轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)榘腴_狀態(tài)等待的時(shí)間 |
automaticTransitionFromOpenToHalfOpenEnabled | false | 如果置為true,當(dāng)?shù)却龝r(shí)間結(jié)束會(huì)自動(dòng)由打開變?yōu)榘腴_埠褪,若置為false浓利,則需要一個(gè)請求進(jìn)入來觸發(fā)熔斷器狀態(tài)轉(zhuǎn)換 |
recordExceptions | empty | 需要記錄為失敗的異常列表 |
ignoreExceptions | empty | 需要忽略的異常列表 |
recordFailure | throwable -> true | 自定義的謂詞邏輯用于判斷異常是否需要記錄或者需要忽略,默認(rèn)所有異常都進(jìn)行記錄 |
測試前準(zhǔn)備
pom.xml
測試使用的IDE為idea钞速,使用的springboot進(jìn)行學(xué)習(xí)測試贷掖,首先引入maven依賴:
<dependency>
<groupId>io.github.resilience4j</groupId>
<artifactId>resilience4j-spring-boot</artifactId>
<version>0.9.0</version>
</dependency>
resilience4j-spring-boot集成了circuitbeaker、retry渴语、bulkhead苹威、ratelimiter幾個(gè)模塊,因?yàn)楹罄m(xù)還要學(xué)習(xí)其他模塊驾凶,就直接引入resilience4j-spring-boot依賴牙甫。
application.yml配置
resilience4j:
circuitbreaker:
configs:
default:
ringBufferSizeInClosedState: 5 # 熔斷器關(guān)閉時(shí)的緩沖區(qū)大小
ringBufferSizeInHalfOpenState: 2 # 熔斷器半開時(shí)的緩沖區(qū)大小
waitDurationInOpenState: 10000 # 熔斷器從打開到半開需要的時(shí)間
failureRateThreshold: 60 # 熔斷器打開的失敗閾值
eventConsumerBufferSize: 10 # 事件緩沖區(qū)大小
registerHealthIndicator: true # 健康監(jiān)測
automaticTransitionFromOpenToHalfOpenEnabled: false # 是否自動(dòng)從打開到半開,不需要觸發(fā)
recordFailurePredicate: com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.RecordFailurePredicate # 謂詞設(shè)置異常是否為失敗
recordExceptions: # 記錄的異常
- com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessBException
- com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessAException
ignoreExceptions: # 忽略的異常
- com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessAException
instances:
backendA:
baseConfig: default
waitDurationInOpenState: 5000
failureRateThreshold: 20
backendB:
baseConfig: default
可以配置多個(gè)熔斷器實(shí)例调违,使用不同配置或者覆蓋配置窟哺。
需要保護(hù)的后端服務(wù)
以一個(gè)查找用戶列表的后端服務(wù)為例,利用熔斷器保護(hù)該服務(wù)技肩。
interface RemoteService {
List<User> process() throws TimeoutException, InterruptedException;
}
連接器調(diào)用該服務(wù)
這是調(diào)用遠(yuǎn)端服務(wù)的連接器且轨,我們通過調(diào)用連接器中的方法來調(diào)用后端服務(wù)。
public RemoteServiceConnector{
public List<User> process() throws TimeoutException, InterruptedException {
List<User> users;
users = remoteServic.process();
return users;
}
}
用于監(jiān)控熔斷器狀態(tài)及事件的工具類
要想學(xué)習(xí)各個(gè)配置項(xiàng)的作用,需要獲取特定時(shí)候的熔斷器狀態(tài)旋奢,寫一個(gè)工具類:
@Log4j2
public class CircuitBreakerUtil {
/**
* @Description: 獲取熔斷器的狀態(tài)
*/
public static void getCircuitBreakerStatus(String time, CircuitBreaker circuitBreaker){
CircuitBreaker.Metrics metrics = circuitBreaker.getMetrics();
// Returns the failure rate in percentage.
float failureRate = metrics.getFailureRate();
// Returns the current number of buffered calls.
int bufferedCalls = metrics.getNumberOfBufferedCalls();
// Returns the current number of failed calls.
int failedCalls = metrics.getNumberOfFailedCalls();
// Returns the current number of successed calls.
int successCalls = metrics.getNumberOfSuccessfulCalls();
// Returns the max number of buffered calls.
int maxBufferCalls = metrics.getMaxNumberOfBufferedCalls();
// Returns the current number of not permitted calls.
long notPermittedCalls = metrics.getNumberOfNotPermittedCalls();
log.info(time + "state=" +circuitBreaker.getState() + " , metrics[ failureRate=" + failureRate +
", bufferedCalls=" + bufferedCalls +
", failedCalls=" + failedCalls +
", successCalls=" + successCalls +
", maxBufferCalls=" + maxBufferCalls +
", notPermittedCalls=" + notPermittedCalls +
" ]"
);
}
/**
* @Description: 監(jiān)聽熔斷器事件
*/
public static void addCircuitBreakerListener(CircuitBreaker circuitBreaker){
circuitBreaker.getEventPublisher()
.onSuccess(event -> log.info("服務(wù)調(diào)用成功:" + event.toString()))
.onError(event -> log.info("服務(wù)調(diào)用失斢净印:" + event.toString()))
.onIgnoredError(event -> log.info("服務(wù)調(diào)用失敗,但異常被忽略:" + event.toString()))
.onReset(event -> log.info("熔斷器重置:" + event.toString()))
.onStateTransition(event -> log.info("熔斷器狀態(tài)改變:" + event.toString()))
.onCallNotPermitted(event -> log.info(" 熔斷器已經(jīng)打開:" + event.toString()))
;
}
調(diào)用方法
CircuitBreaker目前支持兩種方式調(diào)用黄绩,一種是程序式調(diào)用羡洁,一種是AOP使用注解的方式調(diào)用。
程序式的調(diào)用方法
在CircuitService中先注入注冊器爽丹,然后用注冊器通過熔斷器名稱獲取熔斷器筑煮。如果不需要使用降級(jí)函數(shù),可以直接調(diào)用熔斷器的executeSupplier方法或executeCheckedSupplier方法:
public class CircuitBreakerServiceImpl{
@Autowired
private CircuitBreakerRegistry circuitBreakerRegistry;
public List<User> circuitBreakerNotAOP() throws Throwable {
CircuitBreaker circuitBreaker = circuitBreakerRegistry.circuitBreaker("backendA");
CircuitBreakerUtil.getCircuitBreakerStatus("執(zhí)行開始前:", circuitBreaker);
circuitBreaker.executeCheckedSupplier(remotServiceConnector::process);
}
}
如果需要使用降級(jí)函數(shù)粤蝎,則要使用decorate包裝服務(wù)的方法真仲,再使用Try.of().recover()進(jìn)行降級(jí)處理,同時(shí)也可以根據(jù)不同的異常使用不同的降級(jí)方法:
public class CircuitBreakerServiceImpl {
@Autowired
private RemoteServiceConnector remoteServiceConnector;
@Autowired
private CircuitBreakerRegistry circuitBreakerRegistry;
public List<User> circuitBreakerNotAOP(){
// 通過注冊器獲取熔斷器的實(shí)例
CircuitBreaker circuitBreaker = circuitBreakerRegistry.circuitBreaker("backendA");
CircuitBreakerUtil.getCircuitBreakerStatus("執(zhí)行開始前:", circuitBreaker);
// 使用熔斷器包裝連接器的方法
CheckedFunction0<List<User>> checkedSupplier = CircuitBreaker.
decorateCheckedSupplier(circuitBreaker, remoteServiceConnector::process);
// 使用Try.of().recover()調(diào)用并進(jìn)行降級(jí)處理
Try<List<User>> result = Try.of(checkedSupplier).
recover(CallNotPermittedException.class, throwable -> {
log.info("熔斷器已經(jīng)打開初澎,拒絕訪問被保護(hù)方法~");
CircuitBreakerUtil
.getCircuitBreakerStatus("熔斷器打開中:", circuitBreaker);
List<User> users = new ArrayList();
return users;
})
.recover(throwable -> {
log.info(throwable.getLocalizedMessage() + ",方法被降級(jí)了~~");
CircuitBreakerUtil
.getCircuitBreakerStatus("降級(jí)方法中:",circuitBreaker);
List<User> users = new ArrayList();
return users;
});
CircuitBreakerUtil.getCircuitBreakerStatus("執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:", circuitBreaker);
return result.get();
}
}
AOP式的調(diào)用方法
首先在連接器方法上使用@CircuitBreaker(name="",fallbackMethod="")注解秸应,其中name是要使用的熔斷器的名稱,fallbackMethod是要使用的降級(jí)方法碑宴,降級(jí)方法必須和原方法放在同一個(gè)類中软啼,且降級(jí)方法的返回值需要和原方法相同,輸入?yún)?shù)需要添加額外的exception參數(shù)延柠,類似這樣:
public RemoteServiceConnector{
@CircuitBreaker(name = "backendA", fallbackMethod = "fallBack")
public List<User> process() throws TimeoutException, InterruptedException {
List<User> users;
users = remoteServic.process();
return users;
}
private List<User> fallBack(Throwable throwable){
log.info(throwable.getLocalizedMessage() + ",方法被降級(jí)了~~");
CircuitBreakerUtil.getCircuitBreakerStatus("降級(jí)方法中:", circuitBreakerRegistry.circuitBreaker("backendA"));
List<User> users = new ArrayList();
return users;
}
private List<User> fallBack(CallNotPermittedException e){
log.info("熔斷器已經(jīng)打開祸挪,拒絕訪問被保護(hù)方法~");
CircuitBreakerUtil.getCircuitBreakerStatus("熔斷器打開中:", circuitBreakerRegistry.circuitBreaker("backendA"));
List<User> users = new ArrayList();
return users;
}
}
可使用多個(gè)降級(jí)方法,保持方法名相同贞间,同時(shí)滿足的條件的降級(jí)方法會(huì)觸發(fā)最接近的一個(gè)(這里的接近是指類型的接近贿条,先會(huì)觸發(fā)離它最近的子類異常),例如如果process()方法拋出CallNotPermittedException增热,將會(huì)觸發(fā)fallBack(CallNotPermittedException e)方法而不會(huì)觸發(fā)fallBack(Throwable throwable)方法整以。
之后直接調(diào)用方法就可以了:
public class CircuitBreakerServiceImpl {
@Autowired
private RemoteServiceConnector remoteServiceConnector;
@Autowired
private CircuitBreakerRegistry circuitBreakerRegistry;
public List<User> circuitBreakerAOP() throws TimeoutException, InterruptedException {
CircuitBreakerUtil
.getCircuitBreakerStatus("執(zhí)行開始前:",circuitBreakerRegistry.circuitBreaker("backendA"));
List<User> result = remoteServiceConnector.process();
CircuitBreakerUtil
.getCircuitBreakerStatus("執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:", circuitBreakerRegistry.circuitBreaker("backendA"));
return result;
}
}
使用測試
接下來進(jìn)入測試,首先我們定義了兩個(gè)異常峻仇,異常A同時(shí)在黑白名單中公黑,異常B只在黑名單中:
recordExceptions: # 記錄的異常
- com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessBException
- com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessAException
ignoreExceptions: # 忽略的異常
- com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessAException
然后對被保護(hù)的后端接口進(jìn)行如下的實(shí)現(xiàn):
public class RemoteServiceImpl implements RemoteService {
private static AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger(0);
public List<User> process() {
int num = count.getAndIncrement();
log.info("count的值 = " + num);
if (num % 4 == 1){
throw new BusinessAException("異常A,不需要被記錄");
}
if (num % 4 == 2 || num % 4 == 3){
throw new BusinessBException("異常B础浮,需要被記錄");
}
log.info("服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行帆调,獲取用戶列表");
// 模擬數(shù)據(jù)庫的正常查詢
return repository.findAll();
}
}
使用CircuitBreakerServiceImpl中的AOP或者程序式調(diào)用方法進(jìn)行單元測試,循環(huán)調(diào)用10次:
public class CircuitBreakerServiceImplTest{
@Autowired
private CircuitBreakerServiceImpl circuitService;
@Test
public void circuitBreakerTest() {
for (int i=0; i<10; i++){
// circuitService.circuitBreakerAOP();
circuitService.circuitBreakerNotAOP();
}
}
}
看下運(yùn)行結(jié)果:
執(zhí)行開始前:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=0, failedCalls=0, successCalls=0, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
count的值 = 0
服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行豆同,獲取用戶列表
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=1, failedCalls=0, successCalls=1,
執(zhí)行開始前:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=1, failedCalls=0, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
count的值 = 1
異常A番刊,不需要被記錄,方法被降級(jí)了~~
降級(jí)方法中:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=1, failedCalls=0, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=1, failedCalls=0, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行開始前:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=1, failedCalls=0, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
count的值 = 2
異常B,需要被記錄,方法被降級(jí)了~~
降級(jí)方法中:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=2, failedCalls=1, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=2, failedCalls=1, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行開始前:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=2, failedCalls=1, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
count的值 = 3
異常B影锈,需要被記錄,方法被降級(jí)了~~
降級(jí)方法中:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=3, failedCalls=2, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=3, failedCalls=2, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行開始前:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=3, failedCalls=2, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
count的值 = 4
服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行芹务,獲取用戶列表
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=4, failedCalls=2, successCalls=2, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行開始前:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=4, failedCalls=2, successCalls=2, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
count的值 = 5
異常A蝉绷,不需要被記錄,方法被降級(jí)了~~
降級(jí)方法中:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=4, failedCalls=2, successCalls=2, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=4, failedCalls=2, successCalls=2, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行開始前:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=4, failedCalls=2, successCalls=2, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
count的值 = 6
異常B,需要被記錄,方法被降級(jí)了~~
降級(jí)方法中:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=60.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=3, successCalls=2, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=60.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=3, successCalls=2, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行開始前:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=60.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=3, successCalls=2, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
熔斷器已經(jīng)打開枣抱,拒絕訪問被保護(hù)方法~
熔斷器打開中:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=60.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=3, successCalls=2, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=1 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=60.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=3, successCalls=2, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=1 ]
注意到異常A發(fā)生的前后bufferedCalls熔吗、failedCalls、successCalls三個(gè)參數(shù)的值都沒有沒有發(fā)生變化佳晶,說明白名單的優(yōu)先級(jí)高于黑名單桅狠,源碼中也有提到Ignoring an exception has priority over recording an exception:
/**
* @see #ignoreExceptions(Class[]) ). Ignoring an exception has priority over recording an exception.
* <p>
* Example:
* recordExceptions(Throwable.class) and ignoreExceptions(RuntimeException.class)
* would capture all Errors and checked Exceptions, and ignore unchecked
* <p>
*/
同時(shí)也可以看出白名單所謂的忽略,是指不計(jì)入緩沖區(qū)中(即不算成功也不算失斀窝怼)中跌,有降級(jí)方法會(huì)調(diào)用降級(jí)方法,沒有降級(jí)方法會(huì)拋出異常菇篡,和其他異常無異漩符。
執(zhí)行開始前:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=60.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=3, successCalls=2, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
熔斷器已經(jīng)打開,拒絕訪問被保護(hù)方法~
熔斷器打開中:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=60.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=3, successCalls=2, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=1 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=60.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=3, successCalls=2, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=1 ]
當(dāng)環(huán)形緩沖區(qū)大小被填滿時(shí)會(huì)計(jì)算失敗率驱还,這時(shí)請求會(huì)被拒絕獲取不到count的值嗜暴,且notPermittedCalls會(huì)增加。
接下來我們實(shí)驗(yàn)一下多線程下熔斷器關(guān)閉和熔斷器半開兩種情況下緩沖環(huán)的區(qū)別议蟆,我們先開15個(gè)線程進(jìn)行調(diào)用測試熔斷器關(guān)閉時(shí)的緩沖環(huán)闷沥,熔斷之后等10s再開15個(gè)線程進(jìn)行調(diào)用測試熔斷器半開時(shí)的緩沖環(huán):
public class CircuitBreakerServiceImplTest{
@Autowired
private CircuitBreakerServiceImpl circuitService;
@Test
public void circuitBreakerThreadTest() throws InterruptedException {
ExecutorService pool = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
for (int i=0; i<15; i++){
pool.submit(
// circuitService::circuitBreakerAOP
circuitService::circuitBreakerNotAOP);
}
pool.shutdown();
while (!pool.isTerminated());
Thread.sleep(10000);
log.info("熔斷器狀態(tài)已轉(zhuǎn)為半開");
pool = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
for (int i=0; i<15; i++){
pool.submit(
// circuitService::circuitBreakerAOP
circuitService::circuitBreakerNotAOP);
}
pool.shutdown();
while (!pool.isTerminated());
for (int i=0; i<10; i++){
}
}
}
前15個(gè)線程都通過了熔斷器,由于正常返回需要查數(shù)據(jù)庫咐容,所以會(huì)慢很多狐赡,失敗率很快就達(dá)到了100%,而且觀察到如下的記錄:
異常B疟丙,需要被記錄,方法被降級(jí)了~~
降級(jí)方法中:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=100.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=5, successCalls=0, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
可以看出,雖然熔斷器已經(jīng)打開了鸟雏,可是異常B還是進(jìn)入了降級(jí)方法享郊,拋出的異常不是notPermittedCalls數(shù)量為0,說明在熔斷器轉(zhuǎn)換成打開之前所有請求都通過了熔斷器孝鹊,緩沖環(huán)不會(huì)控制線程的并發(fā)炊琉。
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=80.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=4, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=60.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=3, successCalls=2, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=40.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=2, successCalls=3, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=20.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=1, successCalls=4, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
同時(shí)以上幾條正常執(zhí)行的服務(wù)完成后,熔斷器的失敗率在下降又活,說明熔斷器打開狀態(tài)下還是會(huì)計(jì)算失敗率苔咪,由于環(huán)形緩沖區(qū)大小為5,初步推斷成功的狀態(tài)會(huì)依次覆蓋最開始的幾個(gè)狀態(tài)柳骄,所以得到了上述結(jié)果团赏。
接下來分析后15個(gè)線程的結(jié)果
熔斷器狀態(tài)已轉(zhuǎn)為半開
執(zhí)行開始前:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=0.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=0, successCalls=5, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行開始前:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=0.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=0, successCalls=5, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行開始前:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=0.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=0, successCalls=5, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行開始前:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=0.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=0, successCalls=5, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行開始前:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=0.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=0, successCalls=5, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行開始前:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=0.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=0, successCalls=5, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
count的值 = 16
服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行,獲取用戶列表
執(zhí)行開始前:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=0.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=0, successCalls=5, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
熔斷器狀態(tài)改變:2019-07-29T17:19:19.959+08:00[Asia/Shanghai]: CircuitBreaker 'backendA' changed state from OPEN to HALF_OPEN
count的值 = 18
count的值 = 17
服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行耐薯,獲取用戶列表
count的值 = 19
count的值 = 15
熔斷器狀態(tài)從打開到半開我設(shè)置的是5s舔清,前15個(gè)線程調(diào)用之后我等待了10s丝里,熔斷器應(yīng)該已經(jīng)變?yōu)榘腴_了,但是執(zhí)行開始前熔斷器的狀態(tài)卻是OPEN体谒,這是因?yàn)槟J(rèn)的配置項(xiàng)automaticTransitionFromOpenToHalfOpenEnabled=false杯聚,時(shí)間到了也不會(huì)自動(dòng)轉(zhuǎn)換,需要有新的請求來觸發(fā)熔斷器的狀態(tài)轉(zhuǎn)換抒痒。同時(shí)我們發(fā)現(xiàn)幌绍,好像狀態(tài)改變后還是進(jìn)了超過4個(gè)請求,似乎半開狀態(tài)的環(huán)并不能限制線程數(shù)故响?這是由于這些進(jìn)程是在熔斷器打開時(shí)一起進(jìn)來的傀广。為了更好的觀察環(huán)半開時(shí)候環(huán)大小是否限制線程數(shù),我們修改一下配置:
resilience4j:
circuitbreaker:
configs:
myDefault:
automaticTransitionFromOpenToHalfOpenEnabled: true # 是否自動(dòng)從打開到半開
我們再試一次:
熔斷器狀態(tài)已轉(zhuǎn)為半開
執(zhí)行開始前:state=HALF_OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=0, failedCalls=0, successCalls=0, maxBufferCalls=4, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行開始前:state=HALF_OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=0, failedCalls=0, successCalls=0, maxBufferCalls=4, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行開始前:state=HALF_OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=0, failedCalls=0, successCalls=0, maxBufferCalls=4, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
count的值 = 15
count的值 = 16
服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行被去,獲取用戶列表
異常B主儡,需要被記錄,方法被降級(jí)了~~
降級(jí)方法中:state=HALF_OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=1, failedCalls=1, successCalls=0, maxBufferCalls=4, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=HALF_OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=1, failedCalls=1, successCalls=0, maxBufferCalls=4, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
count的值 = 17
異常A,不需要被記錄,方法被降級(jí)了~~
降級(jí)方法中:state=HALF_OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=2, failedCalls=2, successCalls=0, maxBufferCalls=4, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行開始前:state=HALF_OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=2, failedCalls=2, successCalls=0, maxBufferCalls=4, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
count的值 = 18
執(zhí)行開始前:state=HALF_OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=2, failedCalls=2, successCalls=0, maxBufferCalls=4, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
異常B惨缆,需要被記錄,方法被降級(jí)了~~
降級(jí)方法中:state=HALF_OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=3, failedCalls=3, successCalls=0, maxBufferCalls=4, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=HALF_OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=3, failedCalls=3, successCalls=0, maxBufferCalls=4, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
熔斷器已經(jīng)打開:2019-07-29T17:36:14.189+08:00[Asia/Shanghai]: CircuitBreaker 'backendA' recorded a call which was not permitted.
執(zhí)行開始前:state=HALF_OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=2, failedCalls=2, successCalls=0, maxBufferCalls=4, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=HALF_OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=2, failedCalls=2, successCalls=0, maxBufferCalls=4, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
熔斷器已經(jīng)打開糜值,拒絕訪問被保護(hù)方法~
結(jié)果只有4個(gè)請求進(jìn)去了,可以看出雖然熔斷器狀態(tài)還是半開坯墨,但是已經(jīng)熔斷了寂汇,說明在半開狀態(tài)下,超過環(huán)大小的請求會(huì)被直接拒絕捣染。
綜上骄瓣,circuitbreaker的機(jī)制已經(jīng)被證實(shí),且十分清晰耍攘,以下為幾個(gè)需要注意的點(diǎn):
- 失敗率的計(jì)算必須等環(huán)裝滿才會(huì)計(jì)算
- 白名單優(yōu)先級(jí)高于黑名單且白名單上的異常會(huì)被忽略榕栏,不會(huì)占用緩沖環(huán)位置,即不會(huì)計(jì)入失敗率計(jì)算
- 熔斷器打開時(shí)同樣會(huì)計(jì)算失敗率蕾各,當(dāng)狀態(tài)轉(zhuǎn)換為半開時(shí)重置為-1
- 只要出現(xiàn)異常都可以調(diào)用降級(jí)方法扒磁,不論是在白名單還是黑名單
- 熔斷器的緩沖環(huán)有兩個(gè),一個(gè)關(guān)閉時(shí)的緩沖環(huán)式曲,一個(gè)打開時(shí)的緩沖環(huán)
- 熔斷器關(guān)閉時(shí)妨托,直至熔斷器狀態(tài)轉(zhuǎn)換前所有請求都會(huì)通過,不會(huì)受到限制
- 熔斷器半開時(shí)吝羞,限制請求數(shù)為緩沖環(huán)的大小兰伤,其他請求會(huì)等待
- 熔斷器從打開到半開的轉(zhuǎn)換默認(rèn)還需要請求進(jìn)行觸發(fā),也可通過automaticTransitionFromOpenToHalfOpenEnabled=true設(shè)置為自動(dòng)觸發(fā)
TimeLimiter
簡介
與Hystrix不同钧排,Resilience4j將超時(shí)控制器從熔斷器中獨(dú)立出來敦腔,成為了一個(gè)單獨(dú)的組件,主要的作用就是對方法調(diào)用進(jìn)行超時(shí)控制恨溜。實(shí)現(xiàn)的原理和Hystrix相似会烙,都是通過調(diào)用Future的get方法來進(jìn)行超時(shí)控制负懦。
可配置參數(shù)
配置參數(shù) | 默認(rèn)值 | 描述 |
---|---|---|
timeoutDuration | 1(s) | 超時(shí)時(shí)間限定 |
cancelRunningFuture | true | 當(dāng)超時(shí)時(shí)是否關(guān)閉取消線程 |
測試前準(zhǔn)備
pom.xml
<dependency>
<groupId>io.github.resilience4j</groupId>
<artifactId>resilience4j-timelimiter</artifactId>
<version>0.16.0</version>
</dependency>
TimeLimiter沒有整合進(jìn)resilience4j-spring-boot中,需要單獨(dú)添加依賴
application.yml配置
timelimiter:
timeoutDuration: 3000 # 超時(shí)時(shí)長
cancelRunningFuture: true # 發(fā)生異常是否關(guān)閉線程
TimeLimiter沒有配置自動(dòng)注入柏腻,需要自己進(jìn)行注入纸厉,寫下面兩個(gè)文件進(jìn)行配置自動(dòng)注入:
TimeLimiterProperties
用于將application.yml中的配置轉(zhuǎn)換為TimeLimiterProperties對象:
@Data
@Component
@ConfigurationProperties(prefix = "resilience4j.timelimiter")
public class TimeLimiterProperties {
private Duration timeoutDuration;
private boolean cancelRunningFuture;
}
TimeLimiterConfiguration
將TimeLimiterProperties對象寫入到TimeLimiter的配置中:
@Configuration
public class TimeLimiterConfiguration {
@Autowired
private TimeLimiterProperties timeLimiterProperties;
@Bean
public TimeLimiter timeLimiter(){
return TimeLimiter.of(timeLimiterConfig());
}
private TimeLimiterConfig timeLimiterConfig(){
return TimeLimiterConfig.custom()
.timeoutDuration(timeLimiterProperties.getTimeoutDuration())
.cancelRunningFuture(timeLimiterProperties.isCancelRunningFuture()).build();
}
}
調(diào)用方法
還是以之前查詢用戶列表的后端服務(wù)為例。TimeLimiter目前僅支持程序式調(diào)用五嫂,還不能使用AOP的方式調(diào)用颗品。
因?yàn)?strong>TimeLimiter通常與CircuitBreaker聯(lián)合使用,很少單獨(dú)使用沃缘,所以直接介紹聯(lián)合使用的步驟躯枢。
TimeLimiter沒有注冊器,所以通過@Autowired注解自動(dòng)注入依賴直接使用槐臀,因?yàn)?strong>TimeLimter是基于Future的get方法的锄蹂,所以需要?jiǎng)?chuàng)建線程池,然后通過線程池的submit方法獲取Future對象:
public class CircuitBreakerServiceImpl {
@Autowired
private RemoteServiceConnector remoteServiceConnector;
@Autowired
private CircuitBreakerRegistry circuitBreakerRegistry;
@Autowired
private TimeLimiter timeLimiter;
public List<User> circuitBreakerTimeLimiter(){
// 通過注冊器獲取熔斷器的實(shí)例
CircuitBreaker circuitBreaker = circuitBreakerRegistry.circuitBreaker("backendA");
CircuitBreakerUtil.getCircuitBreakerStatus("執(zhí)行開始前:", circuitBreaker);
// 創(chuàng)建單線程的線程池
ExecutorService pool = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor();
//將被保護(hù)方法包裝為能夠返回Future的supplier函數(shù)
Supplier<Future<List<User>>> futureSupplier = () -> pool.submit(remoteServiceConnector::process);
// 先用限時(shí)器包裝水慨,再用熔斷器包裝
Callable<List<User>> restrictedCall = TimeLimiter.decorateFutureSupplier(timeLimiter, futureSupplier);
Callable<List<User>> chainedCallable = CircuitBreaker.decorateCallable(circuitBreaker, restrictedCall);
// 使用Try.of().recover()調(diào)用并進(jìn)行降級(jí)處理
Try<List<User>> result = Try.of(chainedCallable::call)
.recover(CallNotPermittedException.class, throwable ->{
log.info("熔斷器已經(jīng)打開得糜,拒絕訪問被保護(hù)方法~");
CircuitBreakerUtil.getCircuitBreakerStatus("熔斷器打開中", circuitBreaker);
List<User> users = new ArrayList();
return users;
})
.recover(throwable -> {
log.info(throwable.getLocalizedMessage() + ",方法被降級(jí)了~~");
CircuitBreakerUtil.getCircuitBreakerStatus("降級(jí)方法中:",circuitBreaker);
List<User> users = new ArrayList();
return users;
});
CircuitBreakerUtil.getCircuitBreakerStatus("執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:", circuitBreaker);
return result.get();
}
}
使用測試
異常A和B在application.yml文件中沒有修改:
recordExceptions: # 記錄的異常
- com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessBException
- com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessAException
ignoreExceptions: # 忽略的異常
- com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessAException
使用另一個(gè)遠(yuǎn)程服務(wù)接口的實(shí)現(xiàn),將num%4==3的情況讓線程休眠5s晰洒,大于我們TimeLimiter的限制時(shí)間:
public class RemoteServiceImpl implements RemoteService {
private static AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger(0);
public List<User> process() {
int num = count.getAndIncrement();
log.info("count的值 = " + num);
if (num % 4 == 1){
throw new BusinessAException("異常A朝抖,不需要被記錄");
}
if (num % 4 == 2){
throw new BusinessBException("異常B,需要被記錄");
}
if (num % 4 == 3){
Thread.sleep(5000);
}
log.info("服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行谍珊,獲取用戶列表");
// 模擬數(shù)據(jù)庫的正常查詢
return repository.findAll();
}
}
把調(diào)用方法進(jìn)行單元測試治宣,循環(huán)10遍:
public class CircuitBreakerServiceImplTest{
@Autowired
private CircuitBreakerServiceImpl circuitService;
@Test
public void circuitBreakerTimeLimiterTest() {
for (int i=0; i<10; i++){
circuitService.circuitBreakerTimeLimiter();
}
}
}
看下運(yùn)行結(jié)果:
執(zhí)行開始前:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=0, failedCalls=0, successCalls=0, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
count的值 = 0
服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行,獲取用戶列表
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=1, failedCalls=0, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行開始前:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=1, failedCalls=0, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
count的值 = 1
com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessAException: 異常A砌滞,不需要被記錄,方法被降級(jí)了~~
降級(jí)方法中:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=1, failedCalls=0, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=1, failedCalls=0, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行開始前:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=1, failedCalls=0, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
count的值 = 2
com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessBException: 異常B侮邀,需要被記錄,方法被降級(jí)了~~
降級(jí)方法中:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=1, failedCalls=0, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=1, failedCalls=0, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行開始前:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=1, failedCalls=0, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
count的值 = 3
null,方法被降級(jí)了~~
降級(jí)方法中:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=1, failedCalls=0, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=1, failedCalls=0, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
發(fā)現(xiàn)熔斷器任何異常和超時(shí)都沒有失敗。贝润。完全不會(huì)觸發(fā)熔斷豌拙,這是為什么呢?我們把異常toString()看一下:
java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessBException: 異常B题暖,需要被記錄,方法被降級(jí)了~~
java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException,方法被降級(jí)了~~
這下原因就很明顯了,線程池會(huì)將線程中的任何異常包裝為ExecutionException捉超,而熔斷器沒有把異常解包胧卤,由于我們設(shè)置了黑名單,而熔斷器又沒有找到黑名單上的異常拼岳,所以失效了枝誊。這是一個(gè)已知的bug,會(huì)在下個(gè)版本(0.16.0之后)中修正惜纸,目前來說如果需要同時(shí)使用TimeLimiter和CircuitBreaker的話叶撒,黑白名單的設(shè)置是不起作用的绝骚,需要自定義自己的謂詞邏輯,并在test()方法中將異常解包進(jìn)行判斷祠够,比如像下面這樣:
public class RecordFailurePredicate implements Predicate<Throwable> {
@Override
public boolean test(Throwable throwable) {
if (throwable.getCause() instanceof BusinessAException) return false;
else return true;
}
}
然后在application.yml文件中指定這個(gè)類作為判斷類:
circuitbreaker:
configs:
default:
recordFailurePredicate: com.example.resilience4j.predicate.RecordFailurePredicate
就能自定義自己的黑白名單了压汪,我們再運(yùn)行一次試試:
java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException,方法被降級(jí)了~~
降級(jí)方法中:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=3, failedCalls=2, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束后:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=3, failedCalls=2, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
可以看出,TimeLimiter已經(jīng)生效了古瓤,同時(shí)CircuitBreaker也正常工作止剖。
Note:
最新版0.17.0,該bug已經(jīng)修復(fù)落君,黑白名單可以正常使用穿香。
Retry
簡介
同熔斷器一樣,重試組件也提供了注冊器绎速,可以通過注冊器獲取實(shí)例來進(jìn)行重試皮获,同樣可以跟熔斷器配合使用。
可配置參數(shù)
配置參數(shù) | 默認(rèn)值 | 描述 |
---|---|---|
maxAttempts | 3 | 最大重試次數(shù) |
waitDuration | 500[ms] | 固定重試間隔 |
intervalFunction | numberOfAttempts -> waitDuration | 用來改變重試時(shí)間間隔纹冤,可以選擇指數(shù)退避或者隨機(jī)時(shí)間間隔 |
retryOnResultPredicate | result -> false | 自定義結(jié)果重試規(guī)則洒宝,需要重試的返回true |
retryOnExceptionPredicate | throwable -> true | 自定義異常重試規(guī)則,需要重試的返回true |
retryExceptions | empty | 需要重試的異常列表 |
ignoreExceptions | empty | 需要忽略的異常列表 |
測試前準(zhǔn)備
pom.xml
不需要引入新的依賴赵哲,已經(jīng)集成在resilience4j-spring-boot中了
application.yml配置
resilience4j:
retry:
configs:
default:
maxRetryAttempts: 3
waitDuration: 10s
enableExponentialBackoff: true # 是否允許使用指數(shù)退避算法進(jìn)行重試間隔時(shí)間的計(jì)算
expontialBackoffMultiplier: 2 # 指數(shù)退避算法的乘數(shù)
enableRandomizedWait: false # 是否允許使用隨機(jī)的重試間隔
randomizedWaitFactor: 0.5 # 隨機(jī)因子
resultPredicate: com.example.resilience4j.predicate.RetryOnResultPredicate
retryExceptionPredicate: com.example.resilience4j.predicate.RetryOnExceptionPredicate
retryExceptions:
- com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessBException
- com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessAException
- io.github.resilience4j.circuitbreaker.CallNotPermittedException
ignoreExceptions:
- io.github.resilience4j.circuitbreaker.CallNotPermittedException
instances:
backendA:
baseConfig: default
waitDuration: 5s
backendB:
baseConfig: default
maxRetryAttempts: 2
application.yml可以配置的參數(shù)多出了幾個(gè)enableExponentialBackoff待德、expontialBackoffMultiplier、enableRandomizedWait枫夺、randomizedWaitFactor将宪,分別代表是否允許指數(shù)退避間隔時(shí)間,指數(shù)退避的乘數(shù)橡庞、是否允許隨機(jī)間隔時(shí)間较坛、隨機(jī)因子,注意指數(shù)退避和隨機(jī)間隔不能同時(shí)啟用扒最。
用于監(jiān)控重試組件狀態(tài)及事件的工具類
同樣為了監(jiān)控重試組件丑勤,寫一個(gè)工具類:
@Log4j2
public class RetryUtil {
/**
* @Description: 獲取重試的狀態(tài)
*/
public static void getRetryStatus(String time, Retry retry){
Retry.Metrics metrics = retry.getMetrics();
long failedRetryNum = metrics.getNumberOfFailedCallsWithRetryAttempt();
long failedNotRetryNum = metrics.getNumberOfFailedCallsWithoutRetryAttempt();
long successfulRetryNum = metrics.getNumberOfSuccessfulCallsWithRetryAttempt();
long successfulNotyRetryNum = metrics.getNumberOfSuccessfulCallsWithoutRetryAttempt();
log.info(time + "state=" + " metrics[ failedRetryNum=" + failedRetryNum +
", failedNotRetryNum=" + failedNotRetryNum +
", successfulRetryNum=" + successfulRetryNum +
", successfulNotyRetryNum=" + successfulNotyRetryNum +
" ]"
);
}
/**
* @Description: 監(jiān)聽重試事件
*/
public static void addRetryListener(Retry retry){
retry.getEventPublisher()
.onSuccess(event -> log.info("服務(wù)調(diào)用成功:" + event.toString()))
.onError(event -> log.info("服務(wù)調(diào)用失敗:" + event.toString()))
.onIgnoredError(event -> log.info("服務(wù)調(diào)用失敗吧趣,但異常被忽略:" + event.toString()))
.onRetry(event -> log.info("重試:第" + event.getNumberOfRetryAttempts() + "次"))
;
}
}
調(diào)用方法
還是以之前查詢用戶列表的服務(wù)為例法竞。Retry支持AOP和程序式兩種方式的調(diào)用.
程序式的調(diào)用方法
和CircuitBreaker的調(diào)用方式差不多,和熔斷器配合使用有兩種調(diào)用方式强挫,一種是先用重試組件裝飾岔霸,再用熔斷器裝飾,這時(shí)熔斷器的失敗需要等重試結(jié)束才計(jì)算俯渤,另一種是先用熔斷器裝飾呆细,再用重試組件裝飾,這時(shí)每次調(diào)用服務(wù)都會(huì)記錄進(jìn)熔斷器的緩沖環(huán)中八匠,需要注意的是絮爷,第二種方式需要把CallNotPermittedException放進(jìn)重試組件的白名單中趴酣,因?yàn)槿蹟嗥鞔蜷_時(shí)重試是沒有意義的:
public class CircuitBreakerServiceImpl {
@Autowired
private RemoteServiceConnector remoteServiceConnector;
@Autowired
private CircuitBreakerRegistry circuitBreakerRegistry;
@Autowired
private RetryRegistry retryRegistry;
public List<User> circuitBreakerRetryNotAOP(){
// 通過注冊器獲取熔斷器的實(shí)例
CircuitBreaker circuitBreaker = circuitBreakerRegistry.circuitBreaker("backendA");
// 通過注冊器獲取重試組件實(shí)例
Retry retry = retryRegistry.retry("backendA");
CircuitBreakerUtil.getCircuitBreakerStatus("執(zhí)行開始前:", circuitBreaker);
// 先用重試組件包裝,再用熔斷器包裝
CheckedFunction0<List<User>> checkedSupplier = Retry.decorateCheckedSupplier(retry, remoteServiceConnector::process);
CheckedFunction0<List<User>> chainedSupplier = CircuitBreaker .decorateCheckedSupplier(circuitBreaker, checkedSupplier);
// 使用Try.of().recover()調(diào)用并進(jìn)行降級(jí)處理
Try<List<User>> result = Try.of(chainedSupplier).
recover(CallNotPermittedException.class, throwable -> {
log.info("已經(jīng)被熔斷坑夯,停止重試");
return new ArrayList<>();
})
.recover(throwable -> {
log.info("重試失敗: " + throwable.getLocalizedMessage());
return new ArrayList<>();
});
RetryUtil.getRetryStatus("執(zhí)行結(jié)束: ", retry);
CircuitBreakerUtil.getCircuitBreakerStatus("執(zhí)行結(jié)束:", circuitBreaker);
return result.get();
}
}
AOP式的調(diào)用方法
首先在連接器方法上使用@Retry(name="",fallbackMethod="")注解岖寞,其中name是要使用的重試器實(shí)例的名稱,fallbackMethod是要使用的降級(jí)方法:
public RemoteServiceConnector{
@CircuitBreaker(name = "backendA", fallbackMethod = "fallBack")
@Retry(name = "backendA", fallbackMethod = "fallBack")
public List<User> process() throws TimeoutException, InterruptedException {
List<User> users;
users = remoteServic.process();
return users;
}
}
要求和熔斷器一致渊涝,但是需要注意同時(shí)注解重試組件和熔斷器的話慎璧,是按照第二種方案來的,即每一次請求都會(huì)被熔斷器記錄跨释。
之后直接調(diào)用方法:
public class CircuitBreakerServiceImpl {
@Autowired
private RemoteServiceConnector remoteServiceConnector;
@Autowired
private CircuitBreakerRegistry circuitBreakerRegistry;
@Autowired
private RetryRegistry retryRegistry;
public List<User> circuitBreakerRetryAOP() throws TimeoutException, InterruptedException {
List<User> result = remoteServiceConnector.process();
RetryUtil.getRetryStatus("執(zhí)行結(jié)束:", retryRegistry.retry("backendA"));
CircuitBreakerUtil
.getCircuitBreakerStatus("執(zhí)行結(jié)束:", circuitBreakerRegistry.circuitBreaker("backendA"));
return result;
}
}
使用測試
異常A和B在application.yml文件中設(shè)定為都需要重試胸私,因?yàn)槭褂玫谝环N方案,所以不需要將CallNotPermittedException設(shè)定在重試組件的白名單中鳖谈,同時(shí)為了測試重試過程中的異常是否會(huì)被熔斷器記錄岁疼,將異常A從熔斷器白名單中去除:
recordExceptions: # 記錄的異常
- com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessBException
- com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessAException
ignoreExceptions: # 忽略的異常
# - com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessAException
# ...
resultPredicate: com.example.resilience4j.predicate.RetryOnResultPredicate
retryExceptions:
- com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessBException
- com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessAException
- io.github.resilience4j.circuitbreaker.CallNotPermittedException
ignoreExceptions:
# - io.github.resilience4j.circuitbreaker.CallNotPermittedException
使用另一個(gè)遠(yuǎn)程服務(wù)接口的實(shí)現(xiàn),將num%4==2的情況返回null缆娃,測試根據(jù)返回結(jié)果進(jìn)行重試的功能:
public class RemoteServiceImpl implements RemoteService {
private static AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger(0);
public List<User> process() {
int num = count.getAndIncrement();
log.info("count的值 = " + num);
if (num % 4 == 1){
throw new BusinessAException("異常A捷绒,需要重試");
}
if (num % 4 == 2){
return null;
}
if (num % 4 == 3){
throw new BusinessBException("異常B,需要重試");
}
log.info("服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行贯要,獲取用戶列表");
// 模擬數(shù)據(jù)庫的正常查詢
return repository.findAll();
}
}
同時(shí)添加一個(gè)類自定義哪些返回值需要重試暖侨,設(shè)定為返回值為空就進(jìn)行重試,這樣num % 4 == 2時(shí)就可以測試不拋異常崇渗,根據(jù)返回結(jié)果進(jìn)行重試了:
public class RetryOnResultPredicate implements Predicate {
@Override
public boolean test(Object o) {
return o == null ? true : false;
}
}
使用CircuitBreakerServiceImpl中的AOP或者程序式調(diào)用方法進(jìn)行單元測試字逗,循環(huán)調(diào)用10次:
public class CircuitBreakerServiceImplTest{
@Autowired
private CircuitBreakerServiceImpl circuitService;
@Test
public void circuitBreakerRetryTest() {
for (int i=0; i<10; i++){
// circuitService.circuitBreakerRetryAOP();
circuitService.circuitBreakerRetryNotAOP();
}
}
}
看一下運(yùn)行結(jié)果:
count的值 = 0
服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行尚揣,獲取用戶列表
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: state= metrics[ failedRetryNum=0, failedNotRetryNum=0, successfulRetryNum=0, successfulNotyRetryNum=1 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=1, failedCalls=0, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
count的值 = 1
重試:第1次
count的值 = 2
重試:第2次
count的值 = 3
服務(wù)調(diào)用失旛锏酢:2019-07-09T19:06:59.705+08:00[Asia/Shanghai]: Retry 'backendA' recorded a failed retry attempt. Number of retry attempts: '3', Last exception was: 'com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessBException: 異常B,需要重試'.
重試失敗: 異常B刨摩,需要重試
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: state= metrics[ failedRetryNum=1, failedNotRetryNum=0, successfulRetryNum=0, successfulNotyRetryNum=1 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=2, failedCalls=1, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
這部分結(jié)果可以看出來跟狱,重試最大次數(shù)設(shè)置為3結(jié)果其實(shí)只重試了2次俭厚,服務(wù)共執(zhí)行了3次,重試3次后熔斷器只記錄了1次驶臊。而且返回值為null時(shí)也確實(shí)進(jìn)行重試了挪挤。
服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行,獲取用戶列表
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: state= metrics[ failedRetryNum=2, failedNotRetryNum=0, successfulRetryNum=0, successfulNotyRetryNum=3 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=40.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=2, successCalls=3, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
已經(jīng)被熔斷关翎,停止重試
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: state= metrics[ failedRetryNum=2, failedNotRetryNum=0, successfulRetryNum=0, successfulNotyRetryNum=3 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束:state=OPEN , metrics[ failureRate=40.0, bufferedCalls=5, failedCalls=2, successCalls=3, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=1 ]
當(dāng)熔斷之后不會(huì)再進(jìn)行重試扛门。
接下來我修改一下調(diào)用服務(wù)的實(shí)現(xiàn):
public class RemoteServiceImpl implements RemoteService {
private static AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger(0);
public List<User> process() {
int num = count.getAndIncrement();
log.info("count的值 = " + num);
if (num % 4 == 1){
throw new BusinessAException("異常A,需要重試");
}
if (num % 4 == 3){
return null;
}
if (num % 4 == 2){
throw new BusinessBException("異常B笤休,需要重試");
}
log.info("服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行,獲取用戶列表");
// 模擬數(shù)據(jù)庫的正常查詢
return repository.findAll();
}
}
將num%4==2變成異常B症副,num%4==3變成返回null店雅,看一下最后一次重試返回值為null屬于重試成功還是重試失敗政基。
運(yùn)行結(jié)果如下:
count的值 = 0
服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行,獲取用戶列表
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: state= metrics[ failedRetryNum=0, failedNotRetryNum=0, successfulRetryNum=0, successfulNotyRetryNum=1 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束:state=CLOSED , metrics[ failureRate=-1.0, bufferedCalls=1, failedCalls=0, successCalls=1, maxBufferCalls=5, notPermittedCalls=0 ]
count的值 = 1
重試:第1次
count的值 = 2
重試:第2次
count的值 = 3
服務(wù)調(diào)用成功:2019-07-09T19:17:35.836+08:00[Asia/Shanghai]: Retry 'backendA' recorded a successful retry attempt. Number of retry attempts: '3', Last exception was: 'com.example.resilience4j.exceptions.BusinessBException: 異常B闹啦,需要重試'.
如上可知如果最后一次重試不拋出異常就算作重試成功沮明,不管結(jié)果是否需要繼續(xù)重試。
Bulkhead
簡介
Resilence4j的Bulkhead提供兩種實(shí)現(xiàn)窍奋,一種是基于信號(hào)量的荐健,另一種是基于有等待隊(duì)列的固定大小的線程池的,由于基于信號(hào)量的Bulkhead能很好地在多線程和I/O模型下工作琳袄,所以選擇介紹基于信號(hào)量的Bulkhead的使用江场。
可配置參數(shù)
配置參數(shù) | 默認(rèn)值 | 描述 |
---|---|---|
maxConcurrentCalls | 25 | 可允許的最大并發(fā)線程數(shù) |
maxWaitDuration | 0 | 嘗試進(jìn)入飽和艙壁時(shí)應(yīng)阻止線程的最大時(shí)間 |
測試前準(zhǔn)備
pom.xml
不需要引入新的依賴,已經(jīng)集成在resilience4j-spring-boot中了
application.yml配置
resilience4j:
bulkhead:
configs:
default:
maxConcurrentCalls: 10
maxWaitDuration: 1000
instances:
backendA:
baseConfig: default
maxConcurrentCalls: 3
backendB:
baseConfig: default
maxWaitDuration: 100
和CircuitBreaker差不多窖逗,都是可以通過繼承覆蓋配置設(shè)定實(shí)例的址否。
用于監(jiān)控Bulkhead狀態(tài)及事件的工具類
同樣為了監(jiān)控Bulkhead組件,寫一個(gè)工具類:
@Log4j2
public class BulkhdadUtil {
/**
* @Description: 獲取bulkhead的狀態(tài)
*/
public static void getBulkheadStatus(String time, Bulkhead bulkhead){
Bulkhead.Metrics metrics = bulkhead.getMetrics();
// Returns the number of parallel executions this bulkhead can support at this point in time.
int availableConcurrentCalls = metrics.getAvailableConcurrentCalls();
// Returns the configured max amount of concurrent calls
int maxAllowedConcurrentCalls = metrics.getMaxAllowedConcurrentCalls();
log.info(time + ", metrics[ availableConcurrentCalls=" + availableConcurrentCalls +
", maxAllowedConcurrentCalls=" + maxAllowedConcurrentCalls + " ]");
}
/**
* @Description: 監(jiān)聽bulkhead事件
*/
public static void addBulkheadListener(Bulkhead bulkhead){
bulkhead.getEventPublisher()
.onCallFinished(event -> log.info(event.toString()))
.onCallPermitted(event -> log.info(event.toString()))
.onCallRejected(event -> log.info(event.toString()));
}
}
調(diào)用方法
還是以之前查詢用戶列表的服務(wù)為例碎紊。Bulkhead支持AOP和程序式兩種方式的調(diào)用佑附。
程序式的調(diào)用方法
調(diào)用方法都類似,裝飾方法之后用Try.of().recover()來執(zhí)行:
public class BulkheadServiceImpl {
@Autowired
private RemoteServiceConnector remoteServiceConnector;
@Autowired
private BulkheadRegistry bulkheadRegistry;
public List<User> bulkheadNotAOP(){
// 通過注冊器獲得Bulkhead實(shí)例
Bulkhead bulkhead = bulkheadRegistry.bulkhead("backendA");
BulkhdadUtil.getBulkheadStatus("開始執(zhí)行前: ", bulkhead);
// 通過Try.of().recover()調(diào)用裝飾后的服務(wù)
Try<List<User>> result = Try.of(
Bulkhead.decorateCheckedSupplier(bulkhead, remoteServiceConnector::process))
.recover(BulkheadFullException.class, throwable -> {
log.info("服務(wù)失敗: " + throwable.getLocalizedMessage());
return new ArrayList();
});
BulkhdadUtil.getBulkheadStatus("執(zhí)行結(jié)束: ", bulkhead);
return result.get();
}
}
AOP式的調(diào)用方法
首先在連接器方法上使用@Bulkhead(name="", fallbackMethod="", type="")注解仗考,其中name是要使用的Bulkhead實(shí)例的名稱音同,fallbackMethod是要使用的降級(jí)方法,type是選擇信號(hào)量或線程池的Bulkhead:
public RemoteServiceConnector{
@Bulkhead(name = "backendA", fallbackMethod = "fallback", type = Bulkhead.Type.SEMAPHORE)
public List<User> process() throws TimeoutException, InterruptedException {
List<User> users;
users = remoteServic.process();
return users;
}
private List<User> fallback(BulkheadFullException e){
log.info("服務(wù)失敗: " + e.getLocalizedMessage());
return new ArrayList();
}
}
如果Retry秃嗜、CircuitBreaker权均、Bulkhead同時(shí)注解在方法上,默認(rèn)的順序是Retry>CircuitBreaker>Bulkhead痪寻,即先控制并發(fā)再熔斷最后重試螺句,之后直接調(diào)用方法:
public class BulkheadServiceImpl {
@Autowired
private RemoteServiceConnector remoteServiceConnector;
@Autowired
private BulkheadRegistry bulkheadRegistry;
public List<User> bulkheadAOP() throws TimeoutException, InterruptedException {
List<User> result = remoteServiceConnector.process();
BulkheadUtil.getBulkheadStatus("執(zhí)行結(jié)束:", bulkheadRegistry.retry("backendA"));
return result;
}
}
使用測試
在application.yml文件中將backenA線程數(shù)限制為1,便于觀察橡类,最大等待時(shí)間為1s蛇尚,超過1s的會(huì)走降級(jí)方法:
instances:
backendA:
baseConfig: default
maxConcurrentCalls: 1
使用另一個(gè)遠(yuǎn)程服務(wù)接口的實(shí)現(xiàn),不拋出異常顾画,當(dāng)做正常服務(wù)進(jìn)行:
public class RemoteServiceImpl implements RemoteService {
private static AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger(0);
public List<User> process() {
int num = count.getAndIncrement();
log.info("count的值 = " + num);
log.info("服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行取劫,獲取用戶列表");
// 模擬數(shù)據(jù)庫正常查詢
return repository.findAll();
}
}
用線程池調(diào)5個(gè)線程去請求服務(wù):
public class BulkheadServiceImplTest{
@Autowired
private BulkheadServiceImpl bulkheadService;
@Autowired
private BulkheadRegistry bulkheadRegistry;
@Test
public void bulkheadTest() {
BulkhdadUtil.addBulkheadListener(bulkheadRegistry.bulkhead("backendA"));
ExecutorService pool = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
for (int i=0; i<5; i++){
pool.submit(() -> {
// bulkheadService.bulkheadAOP();
bulkheadService.bulkheadNotAOP();
});
}
pool.shutdown();
while (!pool.isTerminated());
}
}
}
看一下運(yùn)行結(jié)果:
開始執(zhí)行前: , metrics[ availableConcurrentCalls=1, maxAllowedConcurrentCalls=1 ]
開始執(zhí)行前: , metrics[ availableConcurrentCalls=1, maxAllowedConcurrentCalls=1 ]
開始執(zhí)行前: , metrics[ availableConcurrentCalls=1, maxAllowedConcurrentCalls=1 ]
開始執(zhí)行前: , metrics[ availableConcurrentCalls=1, maxAllowedConcurrentCalls=1 ]
Bulkhead 'backendA' permitted a call.
count的值 = 0
服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行,獲取用戶列表
開始執(zhí)行前: , metrics[ availableConcurrentCalls=0, maxAllowedConcurrentCalls=1 ]
Bulkhead 'backendA' rejected a call.
Bulkhead 'backendA' rejected a call.
Bulkhead 'backendA' rejected a call.
Bulkhead 'backendA' rejected a call.
服務(wù)失敗: Bulkhead 'backendA' is full and does not permit further calls
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: , metrics[ availableConcurrentCalls=0, maxAllowedConcurrentCalls=1 ]
服務(wù)失敗: Bulkhead 'backendA' is full and does not permit further calls
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: , metrics[ availableConcurrentCalls=0, maxAllowedConcurrentCalls=1 ]
服務(wù)失敗: Bulkhead 'backendA' is full and does not permit further calls
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: , metrics[ availableConcurrentCalls=0, maxAllowedConcurrentCalls=1 ]
服務(wù)失敗: Bulkhead 'backendA' is full and does not permit further calls
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: , metrics[ availableConcurrentCalls=0, maxAllowedConcurrentCalls=1 ]
Bulkhead 'backendA' has finished a call.
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: , metrics[ availableConcurrentCalls=1, maxAllowedConcurrentCalls=1 ]
由上可以看出研侣,5個(gè)請求只有一個(gè)進(jìn)入谱邪,其余觸發(fā)rejected事件,然后自動(dòng)進(jìn)入降級(jí)方法庶诡。接下來我們把等待時(shí)間稍微加長一些:
instances:
backendA:
baseConfig: default
maxConcurrentCalls: 1
maxWaitDuration: 5000
再運(yùn)行一次:
開始執(zhí)行前: , metrics[ availableConcurrentCalls=1, maxAllowedConcurrentCalls=1 ]
開始執(zhí)行前: , metrics[ availableConcurrentCalls=1, maxAllowedConcurrentCalls=1 ]
開始執(zhí)行前: , metrics[ availableConcurrentCalls=1, maxAllowedConcurrentCalls=1 ]
開始執(zhí)行前: , metrics[ availableConcurrentCalls=1, maxAllowedConcurrentCalls=1 ]
開始執(zhí)行前: , metrics[ availableConcurrentCalls=1, maxAllowedConcurrentCalls=1 ]
Bulkhead 'backendA' permitted a call.
count的值 = 0
服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行惦银,獲取用戶列表
Bulkhead 'backendA' permitted a call.
count的值 = 1
Bulkhead 'backendA' has finished a call.
服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行,獲取用戶列表
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: , metrics[ availableConcurrentCalls=0, maxAllowedConcurrentCalls=1 ]
Bulkhead 'backendA' has finished a call.
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: , metrics[ availableConcurrentCalls=1, maxAllowedConcurrentCalls=1 ]
Bulkhead 'backendA' permitted a call.
前面的線程沒有馬上被拒絕,而是等待了一段時(shí)間再執(zhí)行扯俱。
RateLimiter
簡介
高頻控制是可以限制服務(wù)調(diào)用頻率书蚪,Resilience4j的RateLimiter可以對頻率進(jìn)行納秒級(jí)別的控制,在每一個(gè)周期刷新可以調(diào)用的次數(shù)迅栅,還可以設(shè)定線程等待權(quán)限的時(shí)間殊校。
可配置參數(shù)
配置參數(shù) | 默認(rèn)值 | 描述 |
---|---|---|
timeoutDuration | 5[s] | 線程等待權(quán)限的默認(rèn)等待時(shí)間 |
limitRefreshPeriod | 500[ns] | 權(quán)限刷新的時(shí)間,每個(gè)周期結(jié)束后读存,RateLimiter將會(huì)把權(quán)限計(jì)數(shù)設(shè)置為limitForPeriod的值 |
limiteForPeriod | 50 | 一個(gè)限制刷新期間的可用權(quán)限數(shù) |
測試前準(zhǔn)備
pom.xml
不需要引入新的依賴为流,已經(jīng)集成在resilience4j-spring-boot中了
application.yml配置
resilience4j:
ratelimiter:
configs:
default:
limitForPeriod: 5
limitRefreshPeriod: 1s
timeoutDuration: 5s
instances:
backendA:
baseConfig: default
limitForPeriod: 1
backendB:
baseConfig: default
timeoutDuration: 0s
用于監(jiān)控RateLimiter狀態(tài)及事件的工具類
同樣為了監(jiān)控RateLimiter組件,寫一個(gè)工具類:
@Log4j2
public class RateLimiterUtil {
/**
* @Description: 獲取rateLimiter的狀態(tài)
*/
public static void getRateLimiterStatus(String time, RateLimiter rateLimiter){
RateLimiter.Metrics metrics = rateLimiter.getMetrics();
// Returns the number of availablePermissions in this duration.
int availablePermissions = metrics.getAvailablePermissions();
// Returns the number of WaitingThreads
int numberOfWaitingThreads = metrics.getNumberOfWaitingThreads();
log.info(time + ", metrics[ availablePermissions=" + availablePermissions +
", numberOfWaitingThreads=" + numberOfWaitingThreads + " ]");
}
/**
* @Description: 監(jiān)聽rateLimiter事件
*/
public static void addRateLimiterListener(RateLimiter rateLimiter){
rateLimiter.getEventPublisher()
.onSuccess(event -> log.info(event.toString()))
.onFailure(event -> log.info(event.toString()));
}
}
調(diào)用方法
還是以之前查詢用戶列表的服務(wù)為例让簿。RateLimiter支持AOP和程序式兩種方式的調(diào)用敬察。
程序式的調(diào)用方法
調(diào)用方法都類似,裝飾方法之后用Try.of().recover()來執(zhí)行:
public class RateLimiterServiceImpl {
@Autowired
private RemoteServiceConnector remoteServiceConnector;
@Autowired
private RateLimiterRegistry rateLimiterRegistry;
public List<User> ratelimiterNotAOP(){
// 通過注冊器獲得RateLimiter實(shí)例
RateLimiter rateLimiter = rateLimiterRegistry.rateLimiter("backendA");
RateLimiterUtil.getRateLimiterStatus("開始執(zhí)行前: ", rateLimiter);
// 通過Try.of().recover()調(diào)用裝飾后的服務(wù)
Try<List<User>> result = Try.of(
Bulkhead.decorateCheckedSupplier(rateLimiter, remoteServiceConnector::process))
.recover(BulkheadFullException.class, throwable -> {
log.info("服務(wù)失敗: " + throwable.getLocalizedMessage());
return new ArrayList();
});
RateLimiterUtil.getRateLimiterStatus("執(zhí)行結(jié)束: ", rateLimiter);
return result.get();
}
}
AOP式的調(diào)用方法
首先在連接器方法上使用@RateLimiter(name="", fallbackMethod="")注解拜英,其中name是要使用的RateLimiter實(shí)例的名稱静汤,fallbackMethod是要使用的降級(jí)方法:
public RemoteServiceConnector{
@RateLimiter(name = "backendA", fallbackMethod = "fallback")
public List<User> process() throws TimeoutException, InterruptedException {
List<User> users;
users = remoteServic.process();
return users;
}
private List<User> fallback(BulkheadFullException e){
log.info("服務(wù)失敗: " + e.getLocalizedMessage());
return new ArrayList();
}
}
如果Retry、CircuitBreaker居凶、Bulkhead虫给、RateLimiter同時(shí)注解在方法上,默認(rèn)的順序是Retry>CircuitBreaker>RateLimiter>Bulkhead侠碧,即先控制并發(fā)再限流然后熔斷最后重試
接下來直接調(diào)用方法:
public class RateLimiterServiceImpl {
@Autowired
private RemoteServiceConnector remoteServiceConnector;
@Autowired
private RateLimiterRegistry rateLimiterRegistry;
public List<User> rateLimiterAOP() throws TimeoutException, InterruptedException {
List<User> result = remoteServiceConnector.process();
BulkheadUtil.getBulkheadStatus("執(zhí)行結(jié)束:", rateLimiterRegistry.retry("backendA"));
return result;
}
}
使用測試
在application.yml文件中將backenA設(shè)定為20s只能處理1個(gè)請求抹估,為便于觀察,刷新時(shí)間設(shè)定為20s弄兜,等待時(shí)間設(shè)定為5s:
configs:
default:
limitForPeriod: 5
limitRefreshPeriod: 20s
timeoutDuration: 5s
instances:
backendA:
baseConfig: default
limitForPeriod: 1
使用另一個(gè)遠(yuǎn)程服務(wù)接口的實(shí)現(xiàn)药蜻,不拋出異常,當(dāng)做正常服務(wù)進(jìn)行替饿,為了讓結(jié)果明顯一些语泽,讓方法sleep 5秒:
public class RemoteServiceImpl implements RemoteService {
private static AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger(0);
public List<User> process() throws InterruptedException {
int num = count.getAndIncrement();
log.info("count的值 = " + num);
Thread.sleep(5000);
log.info("服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行,獲取用戶列表");
// 模擬數(shù)據(jù)庫正常查詢
return repository.findAll();
}
}
用線程池調(diào)5個(gè)線程去請求服務(wù):
public class RateLimiterServiceImplTest{
@Autowired
private RateLimiterServiceImpl rateLimiterService;
@Autowired
private RateLimiterRegistry rateLimiterRegistry;
@Test
public void rateLimiterTest() {
RateLimiterUtil.addRateLimiterListener(rateLimiterRegistry.rateLimiter("backendA"));
ExecutorService pool = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
for (int i=0; i<5; i++){
pool.submit(() -> {
// rateLimiterService.rateLimiterAOP();
rateLimiterService.rateLimiterNotAOP();
});
}
pool.shutdown();
while (!pool.isTerminated());
}
}
}
看一下測試結(jié)果:
開始執(zhí)行前: , metrics[ availablePermissions=1, numberOfWaitingThreads=0 ]
開始執(zhí)行前: , metrics[ availablePermissions=1, numberOfWaitingThreads=0 ]
開始執(zhí)行前: , metrics[ availablePermissions=1, numberOfWaitingThreads=0 ]
開始執(zhí)行前: , metrics[ availablePermissions=1, numberOfWaitingThreads=0 ]
開始執(zhí)行前: , metrics[ availablePermissions=0, numberOfWaitingThreads=0 ]
RateLimiterEvent{type=SUCCESSFUL_ACQUIRE, rateLimiterName='backendA', creationTime=2019-07-10T17:06:15.735+08:00[Asia/Shanghai]}
count的值 = 0
RateLimiterEvent{type=FAILED_ACQUIRE, rateLimiterName='backendA', creationTime=2019-07-10T17:06:20.737+08:00[Asia/Shanghai]}
RateLimiterEvent{type=FAILED_ACQUIRE, rateLimiterName='backendA', creationTime=2019-07-10T17:06:20.739+08:00[Asia/Shanghai]}
RateLimiterEvent{type=FAILED_ACQUIRE, rateLimiterName='backendA', creationTime=2019-07-10T17:06:20.740+08:00[Asia/Shanghai]}
服務(wù)失敗: RateLimiter 'backendA' does not permit further calls
服務(wù)失敗: RateLimiter 'backendA' does not permit further calls
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: , metrics[ availablePermissions=0, numberOfWaitingThreads=1 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: , metrics[ availablePermissions=0, numberOfWaitingThreads=1 ]
RateLimiterEvent{type=FAILED_ACQUIRE, rateLimiterName='backendA', creationTime=2019-07-10T17:06:20.745+08:00[Asia/Shanghai]}
服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行视卢,獲取用戶列表
服務(wù)失敗: RateLimiter 'backendA' does not permit further calls
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: , metrics[ availablePermissions=0, numberOfWaitingThreads=0 ]
服務(wù)失敗: RateLimiter 'backendA' does not permit further calls
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: , metrics[ availablePermissions=0, numberOfWaitingThreads=0 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: , metrics[ availablePermissions=1, numberOfWaitingThreads=0 ]
只有一個(gè)服務(wù)調(diào)用成功踱卵,其他都執(zhí)行失敗了。現(xiàn)在我們把刷新時(shí)間調(diào)成1s:
configs:
default:
limitForPeriod: 5
limitRefreshPeriod: 1s
timeoutDuration: 5s
instances:
backendA:
baseConfig: default
limitForPeriod: 1
重新執(zhí)行据过,結(jié)果如下:
開始執(zhí)行前: , metrics[ availablePermissions=2, numberOfWaitingThreads=0 ]
開始執(zhí)行前: , metrics[ availablePermissions=2, numberOfWaitingThreads=0 ]
開始執(zhí)行前: , metrics[ availablePermissions=2, numberOfWaitingThreads=0 ]
開始執(zhí)行前: , metrics[ availablePermissions=2, numberOfWaitingThreads=0 ]
開始執(zhí)行前: , metrics[ availablePermissions=2, numberOfWaitingThreads=0 ]
RateLimiterEvent{type=SUCCESSFUL_ACQUIRE, rateLimiterName='backendA', creationTime=2019-07-10T18:25:18.894+08:00[Asia/Shanghai]}
count的值 = 0
RateLimiterEvent{type=SUCCESSFUL_ACQUIRE, rateLimiterName='backendA', creationTime=2019-07-10T18:25:18.894+08:00[Asia/Shanghai]}
count的值 = 1
RateLimiterEvent{type=SUCCESSFUL_ACQUIRE, rateLimiterName='backendA', creationTime=2019-07-10T18:25:19.706+08:00[Asia/Shanghai]}
count的值 = 2
RateLimiterEvent{type=SUCCESSFUL_ACQUIRE, rateLimiterName='backendA', creationTime=2019-07-10T18:25:19.706+08:00[Asia/Shanghai]}
count的值 = 3
RateLimiterEvent{type=SUCCESSFUL_ACQUIRE, rateLimiterName='backendA', creationTime=2019-07-10T18:25:20.703+08:00[Asia/Shanghai]}
count的值 = 4
服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行惋砂,獲取用戶列表
服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行,獲取用戶列表
服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行绳锅,獲取用戶列表
服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行西饵,獲取用戶列表
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: , metrics[ availablePermissions=2, numberOfWaitingThreads=0 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: , metrics[ availablePermissions=2, numberOfWaitingThreads=0 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: , metrics[ availablePermissions=2, numberOfWaitingThreads=0 ]
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: , metrics[ availablePermissions=2, numberOfWaitingThreads=0 ]
服務(wù)正常運(yùn)行,獲取用戶列表
執(zhí)行結(jié)束: , metrics[ availablePermissions=2, numberOfWaitingThreads=0 ]
可以看出鳞芙,幾個(gè)服務(wù)都被放入并正常執(zhí)行了眷柔,即使上個(gè)服務(wù)還沒完成期虾,依然可以放入,只與時(shí)間有關(guān)驯嘱,而與線程無關(guān)彻消。