Golden State Warriors' Kevin Durant (35) celebrates on stage after winning Game 5 of the NBA Finals at Oracle Arena in Oakland, Calif., on Monday, June 12, 2017. The Golden State Warriors defeated the Cleveland Cavaliers 129-120 to win the NBA Championship. (Jose Carlos Fajardo/Bay Area News Group)

By **Tim Kawakami
** | tkawakami@bayareanewsgroup.com
| Bay Area News Group

PUBLISHED: July 4, 2017 at 11:21 am
| UPDATED: July 4, 2017 at 2:10 pm

No, I did not expect to be writing a Kevin Durant July 4 manifesto for the second straight year, but so it goes and here I go…

Yesterday’s news-breaker: Durant has agreed to take $9.6M less than his maximum potential salary for next season to re-sign another one-plus-one deal with the Warriors starting at around $25M, which is also $6.8M less than was necessary for the Warriors to fit him under their own cap mechanics.

Generally, this is the ultimate indication that Durant believes that the Warriors fulfilled every promise made to him in that meeting in the Hamptons last July (which led to his signing announcement exactly a year ago), and this is the fulfillment of everything Durant implicitly promised to them.

不昭殉，我沒有想到會連續(xù)第二年在7月4號寫下凱文-杜蘭特的聲明七婴，但事情就是這樣，然后開始吧。

昨天的頭條新聞：杜蘭特同意與勇士重新簽訂一個新的1+1合同，起薪大概在2500萬美元渠缕，比他下賽季最高可以獲得的薪水要少了960萬美元，也比勇士在工資帽下為了保留他而需要支付的薪水少了680萬美元。

一般來說趋距，這就意味著杜蘭特相信勇士完成了去年7月在漢普頓的會面中給他做出的每一個保證（正是整整一年前的這個會面促成了杜蘭特與勇士簽約），同時這也意味著杜蘭特在履行對勇士暗中的約定越除。

They will work together. They will share, they will all make plenty of money, they will have fun. They will win.

And they will keep this together, for as long as possible, as practically as possible, presuming all sides (including ownership) keep operating in good faith.

Which has happened, and this Durant give-back is the latest and largest example of it.

(The scope of it is what’s most surprising, of course, since we already knew he wasn’t going to demand the $34.6M max in order to let the Warriors maintain their Bird Rights on Iguodala and Livingston.)

他們能一起打球节腐，他們能分享球，他們都會掙很多錢摘盆，他們會很開心翼雀。他們會贏球。

并且他們會盡力的保持這個陣容孩擂，只要依舊可行狼渊，假設(shè)每一方（包括老板）都對此有信心。

如今這已經(jīng)發(fā)生了类垦，而且杜蘭特的讓步也是目前最新而且最有力的例子狈邑。

（當(dāng)然，在我們已經(jīng)知道為了保留伊戈達(dá)拉和利文斯頓的鳥權(quán)他不會要求一份3460萬美元的頂薪的情況下蚤认，最令人吃驚的就是降薪的幅度米苹。）

And the fact that the extra give-back almost certainly led directly to owners Joe Lacob and Peter Guber spending an additional $6-7M combined per year on Andre Iguodala and Shaun Livingston’s new deals is the proof of it, with potentially more extra spending coming in the next few days.

The line connecting Durant’s lesser money to larger payroll issues… is the part that gets people angry — well, of course, anything having to do with the Warriors or Durant specifically just seems to drive people insane, no matter what it is.

The NBA makes a lot of money because fans personalize every decision by every player and every team, but the shrieking on Durant — no matter what he does, when he does it, how he does it — is just way out of scale. Way, way out of scale.

并且事實上這個額外的回饋肯定會直接給到老板喬-拉克布和彼得-古伯，他們在伊戈達(dá)拉和利文斯頓的新合同上每年會多花600-700萬美元砰琢，在未來的日子還可能會更多蘸嘶。

而杜蘭特拿更少的錢和勇士薪資問題之間的關(guān)系也就是為什么有些人會生氣——好吧，當(dāng)然陪汽，任何事只要和勇士或者和杜蘭特有關(guān)就會讓一些人精神失常训唱，無論是什么事。

NBA賺很多錢是因為球迷把每個球員和球隊做的決定都個人化了挚冤，但針對于杜蘭特決定的反應(yīng)都太過夸張了雪情，無論他做了什么，無論他何時做你辣，或者他怎么做巡通。太、太過于夸張了舍哄。

Oh well.

I look at things practically, however, and that always helps me in times like these, especially viewing Durant moves when so many others are using kaleidoscope vision on him.

In a real-world view, all of the work-together-win-together-make-money-together stuff is exactly what this is.

It doesn’t mean any of these Warriors guys are saints or martyrs. They’re all being rewarded quite lucratively. They live great lives.

And the owners, executives, coaches and players also are in a partnership here at a level that you rarely see — they understand this special moment in time and they are reacting to it.

It might not last another season, it might last five seasons, I don’t know. But it’s the environment now, and Durant is reacting to it. So are Lacob and Guber.

If you don’t like or believe that, that’s OK with me. Your call, just as all these decisions are individual calls by each of the Warriors’ principals.******

嗯宴凉，好吧。

我再來實際的看一下杜蘭特的決定表悬，在類似的時候這經(jīng)常能幫到我弥锄，尤其是在如此多的人用各式各樣的眼光看杜蘭特時。

以一個現(xiàn)實世界的角度，這也就正是所謂的一起打球——一起贏球——一起賺錢籽暇。

并不是說這些勇士球員是圣人或烈士温治。他們得到了很多利益。他們活得很好戒悠。

而老板熬荆、總裁、教練和球員同樣在一個合作關(guān)系中绸狐，他們之間的關(guān)系是你很難看到的卤恳，他們及時理解了這個特殊的時刻并做出了各自的應(yīng)對。

這可能無法持續(xù)下去寒矿，也可能保持接下來的5個賽季突琳，我不知道。但這就是現(xiàn)在的氛圍符相，并且杜蘭特給出了自己的應(yīng)對拆融。拉克布和古伯也一樣。

如果你不喜歡或者不相信啊终，對我來說無所謂镜豹。這是你的決定，就像這些每一個決定都是每一個勇士人做出的決定孕索。

OK, to Durant specifically…

His salary for 2017-2018 will be around $25M, which is of course not a pittance, but is several levels lower than the $34.6M max starting salary that Stephen Curry will receive in his new 5-year extension and the $31.8M salary (20% raise from last season) that Durant could’ve received from the Warriors as a non-Bird Rights player.

It’s even lower than the $26.5M Durant received from the Warriors last season.

好逛艰，杜蘭特的情況是...

他在17-18賽季的薪水大概是2500萬美元，當(dāng)然不是一個小數(shù)目搞旭，但比庫里新5年合同的起薪3460萬美元要低了好幾級散怖，也比他作為一個非鳥權(quán)球員可以從勇士拿到的3180萬美元（上賽季20%的漲薪）低了好幾級。

而且這甚至比他去年從勇士領(lǐng)到的薪水2650萬美元還要少肄渗。

And look at this practically:

-Owners who are going way over the luxury-tax line have the right to suggest that there’s a limit to how much tax they want to pay, and the Warriors are already way over the $119M luxury-tax line for this coming season.

-Let’s guess that Lacob and GM Bob Myers maybe had a final-level goal of keeping their payroll near or at $139.999M, just short of triggering a 375% tax on every additional dollar, which, if it went no higher than that, would still produce a $45M tax bill… and a total payroll cost of $185M.

That’s almost double last season’s payroll of about $94M, by the way. The Warriors were in the luxury tax two years ago, but dipped below last year to fit Durant into cap room.

-Players can decide what to do from there. If Durant knew that the Warriors were up against a self-imposed $185M payroll bill when they were negotiating with Iguodala and Livingston, and that he could get them more money if he took less… then that’s his own process.

再來實際的看一下：

-對于工資已經(jīng)超了奢侈線很多的老板來說镇眷，他們有權(quán)利說明他們愿意付出的稅是有一個限制的，并且勇士在接下來的賽季已經(jīng)超過1.19億美元的奢侈稅線非常多翎嫡。

-那么假設(shè)拉克布和總經(jīng)理鮑勃-邁爾斯可能有一個將總工資控制在1.39999億美元的最終目標(biāo)欠动，來避免觸發(fā)375%的奢侈稅，但即便他們沒有超過這個值惑申，依舊會有大概4500萬美元的奢侈稅具伍，加上薪資總花銷在1.85億美元。

這也就大概是去年球隊總工資9400萬美元的兩倍圈驼。勇士隊在兩年前曾交過奢侈稅人芽，但在去年加入杜蘭特之后依然保持在奢侈稅下之下。

-球員可以決定他們要做什么绩脆。如果杜蘭特知道勇士在和伊戈達(dá)拉以及利文斯頓商討新的合約時將會面臨一個1.85億美元的支出并且如果他拿得更少會給球隊更多的資本...那么這就是他自己的事情了萤厅。

It’s not your process. It’s not even Joe Lacob’s process. It’s Durant’s, in this real-world situation of budgets and limits and decisions.

Durant had the right to negotiate for every dollar possible, of course, and he had the right to tell Lacob that if Iguodala and Livingston needed more money, he’d take less.

Again: Real-world budgets, with an owner who is already doubling the payroll costs. Durant easily could’ve told Lacob and Lacob to pay for Iguodala and Livingston themselves, period. Easily, easily. He didn’t.******

這不是你的事情橄抹，這甚至不是喬拉克布的事情。這是杜蘭特的惕味，在這個充滿了預(yù)算楼誓、限制與決定的現(xiàn)實世界。

杜蘭特?fù)碛腥幦∷梢垣@得的每一分錢的權(quán)利名挥，當(dāng)然疟羹，他也有權(quán)告訴拉克布如果伊戈達(dá)拉和利文斯頓需要更多錢，他可以拿少一些躺同。

再次強(qiáng)調(diào)：現(xiàn)實世界的預(yù)算下阁猜，這是一個已經(jīng)付了兩倍工資的老板丸逸。杜蘭特可以輕松地告訴拉克布和古伯他們只能依靠他們自己來付伊戈達(dá)拉和利文斯頓的工資蹋艺，句號。輕松地黄刚。輕松地捎谨。他沒這么做。

-That doesn’t mean either thing had to be agreed to.

Durant could insisted on the $31.8M and nobody would’ve criticized a bit. (OK, it’s Durant, so the Wild Durant Bashers would’ve found a way to criticize him, but nobody sane would’ve criticized him.)

Lacob could’ve said that even if Durant took less, that wouldn’t necessarily mean that Iguodala and Livingston were worth $48M over three years and $20M over three years (two guaranteed years at $8M and a $2M guarantee for the third), respectively.

But both tacit or explicit things were agreed to and Durant took less while Iguodala and Livingston got more, and maybe there’s more coming with roster adds.

-這并不意味著下面兩件事情中任何一件需要被同意憔维。

杜蘭特可以堅持3180萬美元的薪水并且沒有人可以有一點的意見（好吧涛救，這是杜蘭特，瘋狂的杜蘭特黑子可能能找到一個角度來批評他业扒，但沒有正常人會批評他检吆。）

拉克布可以說即使杜蘭特拿得更少了，也不意味著伊戈達(dá)拉和利文斯頓分別在接下來的三年價值4800萬美元和2000萬美元（兩年800萬保障合同和第三年200萬保障）程储。

但這兩件心照不宣或明顯的事情都被同意了蹭沛，杜蘭特拿了更少的薪水而伊戈達(dá)拉和利文斯頓拿了更多，并且隨著輪轉(zhuǎn)球員的加入可能會更多章鲤。

-If Durant didn’t want to give up the money, he had every right not to do it.

The Warriors are incredibly profitable. Durant has made a lot of money. This was his call and he was under no obligation to take a dollar less than he could’ve negotiated.

He certainly deserves it. But in a league with salary limits, and knowing that he still qualifies for the super-max next season (after he declines his player-option next July, as he did this year), then Durant had every right and was smart to weigh every right and how it affects his teammates.

-如果杜蘭特不想放棄薪水摊灭，他有絕對的權(quán)利這么做。

勇士正在賺錢败徊。杜蘭特也賺了很多錢帚呼。這是他的決定并且他沒有任何義務(wù)放棄他可以獲得的每一分錢。

他值得這么多皱蹦。但在一個有工資帽的聯(lián)盟煤杀，并且知道他在下賽季依舊符合超級頂薪（在他明年拒絕執(zhí)行球員選項之后，今年也一樣）沪哺，那么他有作出所有選擇的權(quán)利并足夠聰明地權(quán)衡了所有權(quán)利以及對隊友的影響沈自。

Is he saving Lacob and Guber money? Yes, Durant is literally saving them money.

But it’s within budgeted allotments, and it’s not like Lacob and Guber are cheaping out on anybody or anything — they’re making a giant profit, but they’re also set to pay one of the largest payroll bills in NBA history.******

To make sure they could fit Iguodala and Livingston within those terms and that extravagant budget, Durant gave back some of what he could’ve demanded in the short-term.

他在為拉克布和古伯省錢么？是的凤粗，杜蘭特就是在為他們省錢酥泛。

但這是在預(yù)算分配以內(nèi)的今豆，并不是說拉克布和古伯在任何人和任何事上省錢了。他們正在獲取巨大的利潤柔袁，但他們也即將為NBA歷史上最大的工資單之一買單呆躲。

為了確保他們可以將伊戈達(dá)拉和利文斯頓留下，杜蘭特放棄了短期內(nèi)他可以獲得一些金錢捶索。

I’m not sure why this angers people.

• So, you ask: Why wouldn’t Curry take less too?

That’s an easy one: First, as I have repeatedly said in relation to Durant, great players are under no obligation to ever accept a cut-rate salary. Durant chose to. There was no reason for Curry to do this, specifically in relation to this situation because…

-The Warriors had Curry’s full Bird Rights, which means they could pay him anything without respect to the salary cap. (That is parallel to the Warriors being able to pay Durant anything up to $31.8M. He took less.)

-Also, Durant has made approximately $135M in NBA salary in his career so far.

-Curry has made approximately $56M, thanks to being massively below market-rate the last four years.

我不確定為什么這讓一些人生氣插掂。

• 如果你問：為什么庫里不也拿少一點？

這很容易：首先腥例，就像我在杜蘭特相關(guān)的事情中說過的很多次的那樣辅甥，偉大的球員沒有義務(wù)去接受一個打折的薪水，杜蘭特選擇這么做燎竖。庫里沒有理由去這么做璃弄，尤其是考慮到如下的情況...

-勇士有庫里的鳥權(quán)，也就是說他們可以不考慮工資帽的情況下付他薪水构回。（相對的就是勇士可以付給杜蘭特最多3180萬美元夏块，杜蘭特少拿了）

-并且，杜蘭特職業(yè)生涯到目前為止賺了大概1.35億美元纤掸。

-庫里賺了大約5600萬美元脐供，由于過去四年的合同極大的低于市場價。

If you argue that hey, these players have huge shoe deals and all kinds of other outside income, why not just take less and less salary to help the team pay for other players…

I’d point out that you could say the same thing about NBA owners, who actually make the direct profit off of the talents of those players.

It’s a give and take, as are all negotiations in the real world of massively profitable endeavors.

如果你說這些球員都有巨大的球鞋合同借跪，還有各種其他的收入政己，為什么不少拿一些幫助球隊簽下其他的球員。

我會說這些對NBA老板們也是一樣的掏愁，他們才是真正從這些球員的天賦中直接賺錢的人歇由。

這是一個互相讓步，就像現(xiàn)實世界里高利潤的經(jīng)營的所有談判一樣托猩。

All sides have earned the right to negotiate — or give-back — what and when they want.

The Durant give-back isn’t unique in NBA or sports history, either. Tom Brady has done it throughout his NFL career. Several Spurs stars have done it repeatedly.

Derek Carr did it in a limited way with his new Raiders deal, and was lauded.

I don’t know why this specific case is the one people want to fight over, or why they want to demand rules changes because of just this, but I guess it’s Durant and people just want to fight if his name is brought up.

各個方面都有談判或者放棄的權(quán)利印蓖，關(guān)于他們想要什么以及何時想要。

杜蘭特的這個讓步在NBA或者體育歷史中并不是獨一無二的京腥，NFL的湯姆-布雷迪整個生涯都在這么干赦肃。有幾個馬刺的球星也在不斷地這么干。

德里克-卡爾在他與Raiders的新合同中也這么干了公浪，他被稱贊了他宛。

所以我就不明白為什么杜蘭特的這個事人們要吵來吵去，或者為什么他們僅僅因為杜蘭特就要求修改需求條款欠气，我猜因為這是杜蘭特厅各，而人們看到他的名字之后就想爭吵。

• All this maneuvering to try to avoid giving players the right to put together and maintain super-teams… has only ended up making it easier.

And* encouraging* it.

I keep arguing this and the evidence keeps piling up.

• 所有試圖讓球員放棄組建并維持超級球隊的努力...最終都使得這一切更容易预柒。

并不斷促使這些出現(xiàn)队塘。

我一直這么說并且不斷有證據(jù)支撐我的觀點袁梗。

In a league with salary limits, the less-attractive teams have to give the max-deals to their own best players, even if their own best players aren’t at the top-10/20/30 level.

For instance, last July, Memphis had to pay Mike Conley, Jr., the max as he was coming up for an extension, or else why would he stay?

Problem: Conley is a very good and valuable player, but he’s not close to a top-10 player, and he’s currently now making $3.5M more than Durant because Conley had the leverage on Memphis last July and Memphis had to pay him the max because who else were they going to get for that number?

在一個有薪水限制的聯(lián)盟，最沒有吸引力的球隊不得不把它的頂薪給隊中最好的球員憔古，即使他們最好的球員并不在前10/20/30的水平上遮怜。

例如，去年7月鸿市，孟菲斯不得不在邁克-康利續(xù)約時提供一份頂薪合同锯梁，不然他為什么要留下來呢？

問題：康利是一個很好且有價值的球員焰情，但他根本不是前10的水平陌凳，現(xiàn)在他正賺著比杜蘭特多350萬美元的薪水，因為他與孟菲斯談判時有籌碼内舟，而孟菲斯不得不給他一份頂薪合敦，不然誰還能打出他給出的數(shù)據(jù)？

Nobody. That’s what salary-limits do: They shrink the range of salaries, especially at the top, which means that very good players make essentially the same as the greatest players and while that isn’t perfect for the greatest players, it also means their team preference is a larger factor (because all teams are essentially offering them similar salaries).

Do you see how this works? The Warriors are taking advantage of this, and why shouldn’t they, and everything the league does to try to stop this possibility only makes it easier and more appealing to do.

I will remind everybody that the Warriors were in a similar unattractive place several years ago, in the Cohan ownership and the beginnings of the Lacob/Guber timeline, despite their Bay Area location, because they had a terrible reputation.

沒人谒获。所以工資帽做的事情是：限制了薪水蛤肌，尤其是最好的球員的薪水壁却，也就是說好的球員基本上賺得和最偉大的球員一樣多批狱，這對最偉大的球員來說并不好，也就意味著球隊的選擇是一個很大的因素（因為所有的球隊基本上提供的都是一樣的薪水）展东。

你明白這是如何起作用的了么赔硫？勇士正在利用這個，而且為什么不呢盐肃，聯(lián)盟做的所有為了阻止超級球隊的事情只是使得這些更容易爪膊，而且更有吸引力。

我會提醒你們勇士幾年前在柯漢時代以及拉克布/古伯開始時就處于一個相似的沒有吸引力的境地砸王，就是因為他們有一個糟糕的名聲推盛，灣區(qū)的地理位置也幫不到他們。

Then things changed, Lacob and Guber started putting the pieces together and took full advantage of the area’s connections to Silicon Valley and everything else, and now the Warriors are the marquee team in the league and able to…

-Lure the best free agents and interestingly the first one they got, in a sign-and-trade, was Iguodala in 2013; he started the cycle that renewed itself this July;

-Keep at least one of them for far below his market rate because he wanted to stay and to help maintain the full roster core.

然后事情慢慢就變了谦铃，拉克布和古伯開始讓球隊走上正軌耘成，并且充分利用了與硅谷的關(guān)系以及其他，如今勇士成了聯(lián)盟中鼎鼎大名的球隊并且能夠...

-吸引最優(yōu)秀的自由球員驹闰，有趣的是他們得到的第一個就是2013年先簽后換的伊戈達(dá)拉瘪菌，今年7月他續(xù)約了。

-用低于市場價的合同留下他們中的至少一個嘹朗，因為他們想要留下并幫助維持主要的輪換师妙。

• I will get into this later, but yes, the recent wave of signings push the Warriors over the $125M luxury-tax apron line, and there are consequences, which they knew and wanted to avoid.

They didn’t avoid it — that Livingston deal pretty much guaranteed that the Warriors will fly over the $125M number, which is why I thought they might let him go; but they kept him and going over the apron is the price they paid to keep it together.

I have the Warriors at about $126M in salary commitments to 11 players (counting unsigned draftee Jordan Bell).

我稍后會細(xì)說這個，但沒錯屹培，勇士最近的簽約潮已經(jīng)使得自己的薪資總額超過了1.25億美元的土豪線默穴，他們明白并且希望避免這帶來的后果怔檩。

他們并沒有避免——利文斯頓的合同基本上也就保證了勇士的薪資會超過1.25億美元，這也是我認(rèn)為他們會放棄利文斯頓的原因蓄诽；但他們留下了他珠洗，超過土豪線也就是他們?yōu)榱司S持陣容付出的代價。

我預(yù)計勇士的薪資目前在1.26億美元左右若专，包括了11名球員许蓖，其中有還未簽約的新秀喬丹貝爾。

To fill their roster (max number is 15 players), even using low salaries (and I’m assuming they’ll use at least a few non-minimums to grab a center and an experienced guard), the sensible minimum they could realistically end up at is around $135M right now, I think.

Might be a tick lower, but around there, and if they have to spend a little more of their taxpayer mid-level exception than they want for somebody like Nick Young or a workable starting center, then it will definitely bump against the presumed $139.999M line.

Or go over. I’m not saying they can’t get to $140M, but I’m saying it sets up for them to work this right around there.

為了填滿陣容（最多15名球員）调衰，即使使用底薪（我認(rèn)為他們會至少用一些非底薪去簽一個中鋒以及一個有經(jīng)驗的后衛(wèi)）膊爪，我認(rèn)為他們最終的薪水最低也在1.35億美元左右。

可能會稍低一點嚎莉，但差不多米酬。并且如果勇士不得不使用更多的中產(chǎn)特例來簽下尼克-楊或者可用的首發(fā)中鋒，那么他們的薪資肯定會跳到之前假設(shè)的1.39999億美元的線趋箩。

或者超過赃额。我不是說他們不能達(dá)到1.4億美元，我是說這是他們開始一切工作的基礎(chǔ)叫确。

• The main consequence of going over the tax apron is that it hard-caps a team. The Warriors can still add players at minimum levels under hard-cap but when you’re hard-capped, you lose:

-The ability to take players in sign-and-trades;

-The biannual exception ($3.3M this year);

-Protection from the “Gilbert Arenas Rule” for second-round draft picks coming up for their next contract… which would solely in this case mean Patrick McCaw, due to become a free agent next July.

• 超過土豪線的主要后果是球隊受硬工資帽限制跳芳。在硬工資帽以下勇士依舊可以得到球員，但如果被硬工資帽限制竹勉，你將失去：

-用簽換得到球員的能力飞盆；

-雙年特例（今年是330萬美元）；

-二輪秀在下一份合同的“基爾伯特-阿里納斯條款”的保護(hù)次乓，針對明年7月成為自由球員的帕特里克-麥考吓歇。

McCaw is the big deal here and as this payroll explodes, there is no doubt that the Warriors will want to keep McCaw, presuming everything goes well in his second season.

If they’re hard-capped next July, that would almost guarantee losing McCaw because they couldn’t match any kind of market-rate offer.

I’m not going to get into the deeper details here and now, plus I don’t want to bug some of my favorite salary-cap experts on the holiday, but the way I’m reading the CBA (as always, thanks Larry Coon!)…

麥考如今很重要，當(dāng)工資爆炸票腰，毫無疑問勇士希望能留下麥考城看，假設(shè)他的第二個賽季一切正常。

如果明年7月他們受到硬工資帽限制杏慰，那么基本上也就意味著勇士會失去麥考测柠，因為他們肯定無法匹配任何市場價的合同。

我不會再往下細(xì)究了而且我也不想在假期再去打擾我最喜歡的薪資-工資帽專家了（感謝拉里-柯恩）逃默，但我讀CBA（譯者注：勞資協(xié)定）之后...

But I see several ways the Warriors could get themselves below the projected apron line of $129M next July, and out of the hard cap, which would maintain their Arenas rights on McCaw.

Some of them involve Durant’s contract number and it gets complicated. More on this in a later item.

Generally, it won’t be super-easy to get below the apron and therefore maintain their Arenas rights on McCaw, but I don’t think it’s impossible and in fact I would predict that the Warriors already know they can do this.

我看到了一些勇士可以將薪資降到明年7月預(yù)計的土豪線1.29億美元之下鹃愤，從而擺脫硬工資帽限制，保留麥考的阿里納斯條款的方式完域。

其中的一些涉及到杜蘭特的合同數(shù)字软吐，并且很復(fù)雜。以后再討論這個吟税。

大致上來說凹耙，降到土豪線以下并保留麥考的阿里納斯條款不會很容易姿现，但我認(rèn)為不是不可能，而且事實上我覺得勇士應(yīng)該已經(jīng)知道他們可以做到肖抱。