版權(quán)聲明：

以下內(nèi)容翻譯Sussi冬竟。校對Lochaiching。轉(zhuǎn)載必須保留以上聲明民逼。僅授權(quán)原文轉(zhuǎn)載泵殴。

本文原文鏈接為https://medium.com/@EosMetal/a-way-towards-scalable-and-trusted-dispute-resolution-network-on-eos-23be726f3657

A way towards Scalable and Trusted Dispute Resolution Network on EOS

一種在EOS(區(qū)塊鏈操作系統(tǒng))上實現(xiàn)可延展并且可信賴的網(wǎng)絡(luò)糾紛解決方法

metal01.png

來源：EOSMetal

翻譯：Sussi

校對：Lochaiching

EOS network is stepping towards Referendum and debates around constitution are sparking up. Since our last post on introducing Tungsten, ECAF check and balances have been revised by Ian Grigg (Advisor on Arbitration Working Group, EOS Alliance).One of the major modification is?—?now BPs retain the power to judge the awards and execute based on the rulings.

EOS網(wǎng)絡(luò)正在走向公投，并且圍繞憲法的討論正在升溫拼苍。自從我們上一次在introducingTungsten（中文版鏈接：【翻譯|公告】用于dApp層面治理的Tungsten（PoC版本））上發(fā)帖子以來笑诅，Ian Grigg(EOS聯(lián)盟的仲裁工作的組的顧問)已經(jīng)修訂了ECAF的審查和制衡（準(zhǔn)則）。其中一個主要的修改是——現(xiàn)在BP們保留了基于準(zhǔn)則進(jìn)行裁決和執(zhí)行的權(quán)力。

Metal02.png

1.準(zhǔn)則和指令是為團(tuán)體審查發(fā)布的
2.BPS與/或締約方可以通過提交上訴來申訴準(zhǔn)則中的任何指示
3.最終吆你，BPs與/或締約方可能產(chǎn)生沖突——這會導(dǎo)致我們所說的團(tuán)隊危機(jī)——因為這基本上意味著團(tuán)隊中三個“權(quán)力”方中的兩方存在分歧弦叶。這就需要第三方來解決矛盾。 在這種情況下妇多，如果BPS違反了仲裁員的命令伤哺，那么就要進(jìn)行全民公投。如果團(tuán)體支持BPs砌梆，那么Arb的里就受損默责。如果團(tuán)體支持Arb，那BPs就需要讓一步咸包。
4.分歧
5.在ECAF論壇中，仲裁員們可以相互討論他們的裁決杖虾，并可以尋求顧問的建議烂瘫。這回事一場有些棘手的對話，因為我們必須小心翼翼奇适，不去強(qiáng)迫重裁員采納我們的建議——我們

Current Proposal of Check and balances by Ian Grigg on EOSGov?—

1. transparency of the process?—?filing, case. Albeit the Arbitrator has some latitude to close off some elements here.
2. the public ruling which some few will make a process of reading and critiquing, which critique will stick to the name of the Arbitrator.
3. the in-forum appeal process.
4. the decision of parties, BPs and other impacted persons to enforce or deny the ruling.
5. the ability of ECAF to provide some non-case pressure. Mostly, no more cases.
6. disciplinary hearings.
7. the impact of the Community referenda to speak as a third head of power.
8. appeals to national courts.

現(xiàn)在Ian Grigg在EOSGov中關(guān)于核查和制衡建議——

1.過程的透明度——整理歸檔坟比，案件。盡管仲裁員有一定權(quán)限封鎖一些元素
2.在公開仲裁中少數(shù)人將進(jìn)行閱讀和批評的過程嚷往，這將會以仲裁員的名義進(jìn)行
3.在論壇上上訴的過程
4.當(dāng)事人葛账，BP們和其他有影響力的人對于執(zhí)行還是拒絕仲裁的決定
5.ECAF提供一些非案件壓力的能力。 大多數(shù)情況下皮仁，沒有多余的案例
6.紀(jì)律聽證會
7.社會公投的影響力作為首要力量發(fā)言
8.向國家法院上訴

ECAF rulings are now proposed to be non-binding i.e they may or may not be enforced by BPs. Though non-binding award/rulings help with maintaining check and balances, the approach seems to be impractical if one consider scaling and efficiency. Our arguments against the proposal are—

現(xiàn)在看來籍琳，ECFA的裁決是不具約束力的，也就是說贷祈，它們可能會被BP們強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行趋急，也可能不會。雖然沒有約束力的判定/裁決有助于維護(hù)核查和制衡势誊，但如果考慮延展性和效率的話呜达，這種做法似乎是不切實際的。 我們反對這項提議的理由是——

1. Inefficient Structure.

In case of any dispute, a claimant files a claim on ECAF with piece of evidences. If dispute needs an account being frozen (in most cases), an emergency arbitrator gets assigned who looks into evidence (could even demand more pieces of evidence) and give an arbitral order to freeze accounts.

1.沒有效率的結(jié)構(gòu)

如果有任何爭議粟耻，原告向RCAF提出要證據(jù)的要求查近。如果爭議需要凍結(jié)帳戶（在大多數(shù)情況下），緊急仲裁員就會被指派去調(diào)查證據(jù)（甚至可以要求更多的證據(jù)）并下達(dá)凍結(jié)帳戶的仲裁命令挤忙。

Case details and execution history?—?https://eoscorearbitration.io/case-
ecaf00000441

案例細(xì)節(jié)和執(zhí)行歷史——https://eoscorearbitration.io/case-
ecaf00000441

Active Block Producers need to judge an arbitration order (as they are not-binding and are at discretion of BPs), reach consensus (21/21 BPs) on whether to blacklist/freeze an account or not. Once consensus is reached, the claimed account gets frozen by BPs.

有源區(qū)塊生產(chǎn)者需要判斷仲裁命令（因為它們不具有約束力霜威，并且由BP決定），就是否將一個賬戶列入黑名單或凍結(jié)達(dá)成共識（21/21BP）饭玲。 一旦達(dá)成共識侥祭，被告的賬戶就會被BP們凍結(jié)。

In simple terms, a claimant needs to act within the 3-days of staking period, collect enough evidence to prove his claim and remains on the mercy of Emergency arbitrator plus 21 Active BPs to work effectively. There already have been two cases where hacker accounts made their way out of blacklist as BPs weren’t able to reach consensus or failed to update the blacklist.

簡而言之，原告需要在規(guī)定的3天內(nèi)采取行動矮冬，收集足夠的證據(jù)來證明他的訴求谈宛，并繼續(xù)聽從緊急仲裁員和21位BP們的指令，以便他們有效地工作胎署。由于BP不能達(dá)成共識或未能更新黑名單吆录，黑客的賬戶就順利脫離了黑名單的情況已經(jīng)發(fā)生了兩次。

Metal03.png

2. Scalability

Expansion of EOS Network will lead to many disputes which will demand fast actions by Arbitrators as well as the Block Producers. We don’t feel the Dispute Resolution structure in its current form could work or effectively scale, putting our arguments forward -

a.Assumption voters will vote out BPs if they don’t comply with legit orders.

Let’s look at the problem of DPOS. On paper, BPs are ‘decentralised’. We can even measure it at 21. And the community will praise and punish via voting.
Except, that’s not what is happening. The community are NOT praising and punishing BPs. What is happening is that a small group of cooperating whales are pushing the BPs up and down according to some internal agenda that they are not revealing.?—?Ian Grigg (@suntzu)
Source

Whales may or may not care much about the arbitral award by ECAF or the judgement of whales. Even if they do, it would be very difficult for the voters to keep themselves updated on actions of Block Producers whether they comply with an arbitral award or not. Secondly, BPs judgement would be biased towards whales and big proxies to keep themselves in business.

2.可擴(kuò)展性

EOS網(wǎng)絡(luò)的擴(kuò)展將導(dǎo)致許多糾紛琼牧，這就要求仲裁員和BP們快速行動恢筝。我們認(rèn)為，目前形式的爭端解決結(jié)構(gòu)無法工作或有效擴(kuò)展巨坊，我們提出我們的論據(jù)——

a.假定投票的人如果不遵守法律指令撬槽，他們就會投票給BP們。

讓我們看看DPOS的問題趾撵。理論上侄柔，BP們是“去中心化的”。我們甚至可以在21名中進(jìn)行測量占调，并且社區(qū)將會通過投票進(jìn)行獎勵和懲罰暂题。
而事情并不是這樣進(jìn)行的，社區(qū)并不會獎勵或者懲罰BP究珊。事實是薪者，一小群相互合作的巨鯨們正在根據(jù)它們沒有公布的一些內(nèi)部事項在推動BP〗虽蹋—?Ian Grigg (@suntzu)

這些巨鯨可能會關(guān)心ECAF對巨鯨的裁決言津，也或許不會。即使他們關(guān)心幔虏，投票的人也很難隨時了解BP們的行動纺念，不能得知他們是否遵守仲裁裁決。其次想括，BP們的判決會偏向于巨鯨和大的代理賬號陷谱，來維持自己的商業(yè)行為。

b. Small size disputes

We need to think of a structure which considers 20 disputes may not even be considered. To suggest that BPs should look into every 100 claims will be wrong in itself and has a weak standing.

Any mediation through current model need to be followed by emergency actions by BPs (account freeze or transaction reversed), which should be automated to no human intervention.

b.小規(guī)模糾紛

我們需要思考一個自動化的解決20-100美元糾紛的框架瑟蜈。我們不能指望人工處理網(wǎng)絡(luò)上的所有種類的訴訟案件烟逊。人工處理會增加解決糾紛的價格宪躯，在目前的情況下，甚至不會考慮用人工處理的方式解決20美元的糾紛访雪。建議BP們處理所有50-100美元的案件這樣的說法本來就站不住腳。

任何通過當(dāng)前模型進(jìn)行調(diào)解的糾紛都需要由BP進(jìn)行緊急行動（賬戶凍結(jié)或交易逆轉(zhuǎn)）臣缀，而這應(yīng)該是自動化的，不需要人工服務(wù)精置。

c. Inconvenient

Further we believe it won’t be right to assume ECAF and BPs will act fast and safeguard from hacks/scams/stolen funds, it would lead to more disputes and chaos when scammer could transfer tokens to DEX and exchange them for new tokens of TLOS/Worbli.

We are stepping towards mass adoption (with thousand of dApplication and millions of users), it’s too much of workload for a single entity in managing or reviewing external forums/court rulings.

c.不方便

此外计寇，我們認(rèn)為，假設(shè)ECAF和BP們將快速采取行動并防范黑客/騙子/資金被盜是不對的脂倦，當(dāng)詐騙者將token轉(zhuǎn)移到DEX并把它換成新的TLOS/ Worbli token時番宁，會導(dǎo)致更多的爭議和混亂。

我們正在走向被社區(qū)大規(guī)模地采用(有成千上萬的dApplication和數(shù)百萬的用戶)赖阻，在需要管理或?qū)彶橥獠空搲?法院裁決時蝶押，對單個組織來說工作量太大了。

Could we have many forums resolving disputes?

The current structure gives you the freedom of opt-in for different forums at dApplication level but any award by external court needs to reviewed by ECAF to get it enforced by BPs.

我們能有多個論壇來解決糾紛嗎政供？

當(dāng)前的結(jié)構(gòu)讓你可以在dApplication層面自由選擇不同的論壇播聪，但是任何外部法院的判決都需要由ECAF進(jìn)行審查，以便BP們可以強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行布隔。

Reasons being-

1.It would be difficult for BPs to consider ruling from many forums opted in by the community.

2. Any arbitration forum without skin in the game or anything at stake could be influenced either by competitor dApplication/ bad actor in his favor.

3.Interestingly one point which has been raised many times in Gov chat is if national courts are willing to get their rulings enforced against certain party in their jurisdiction they need to claim on ECAF as Claimant.

原因是——

1、BP們很難考慮由團(tuán)體選的多個論壇做出的判決稼虎。

2氛谜、任何在競爭中沒有包裝的論壇或者利益攸關(guān)的事情都會受到對對手有利的dApplication/壞角色的影響琼蚯。

3、有趣的是，在治理群組中多次提到的一個觀點(diǎn)是常潮，如果國家法院愿意對他們管轄范圍內(nèi)的某一方執(zhí)行強(qiáng)制裁決，那么他們就需要向ECAF申請賠償纹磺。

Metal04.png

Need for Fourth Party (Automation) in Dispute Resolution

Though EOS is still in its infancy, it is scaling rampantly and has become one of the most used Blockchains for now. With scaling of the network, automation becomes important in terms of Online Dispute Resolution to establish trust among the community members and offer them hassle free services. Ebay has been at the forefront of online dispute resolution and there are many lessons we could take from Colin Rule (Former Director of ODR on Ebay).

糾紛解決中第四方（自動）的需求

雖然EOS還處于起步階段弦聂，但它正在逐漸發(fā)展，并已成為目前使用最廣泛的區(qū)塊鏈之一柳击。隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)規(guī)模的擴(kuò)大猿推，為了在團(tuán)體成員之間建立信任蹬叭，并且為他們提供免費(fèi)的服務(wù)，自動化在解決在線糾紛方面變得非常重要盲再。 Ebay一直處于在線解決糾紛的前沿水平，我們可以從Colin Rule（前Ebay ODR董事）那里學(xué)到很多東西绿映。

Key points from Colin Rule’s published paper “What we know and need to know about online dispute Resolution” and why we think automation will be needed?

1. The number of disputes increases whenever transactions and relationships increase.
2. The more novel the activity, the greater the likelihood of disputes. The first iteration of an innovative product or activity rarely anticipates all the disputes that it will generate.
3. The more valuable the item or issue in question, the more likely it is that a problem or grievance will turn into a dispute.
4. Speed and time pressures lead to disputes. If the value is likely to erode quickly, as is often the case with technology, a pressure to protect and aggressively extend its value increases.
5. Increased complexity in relationships and systems create more opportunities for disputes. In the words of computer scientist Peter Neumann, “Complex systems break in complex ways.” When informing shareholders about a federal investigation of problems in correcting errors, Experian stated that “We might fail to comply with international, federal, regional, provincial, state or other jurisdictional regulations, due to their complexity, frequent changes or inconsistent application and interpretation.”
6. The easier it is to complain (by filling out an online form or sending an email), the more disputes there will be.
7. The lack of transparency in algorithms leads to disputes.
8. The less attention is given to preventing disputes, the more disputes there will be.

Colin Rule發(fā)表的論文“關(guān)于在線糾紛解決我們知道什么與需要知道什么”的核心論點(diǎn)和我們?yōu)槭裁凑J(rèn)為需要自動化

1.每當(dāng)交易和關(guān)系的數(shù)量增加時淹冰，糾紛的數(shù)量就會增加。
2.活動越新穎晶乔，產(chǎn)生糾紛的可能性就越大。創(chuàng)新產(chǎn)品或活動的首次迭代不太能預(yù)知它將引起的所有糾紛。
3.有問題的項目或問題越有價值裆泳，問題或申訴就越有可能變成糾紛工禾。

4. 速度和時間壓力會產(chǎn)生糾紛帜篇。如果像在技術(shù)領(lǐng)域常見的那樣笙隙，價值迅速下跌竟痰，那么保護(hù)和積極提高它價值的壓力就會增加坏快。
   5.越來越復(fù)雜的關(guān)系和系統(tǒng)讓產(chǎn)生糾紛的可能性增加莽鸿。用計算機(jī)科學(xué)家Peter Neumann的話說祥得，“復(fù)雜系統(tǒng)以復(fù)雜的方式斷裂级及∫梗” Experian在向股東說明聯(lián)邦調(diào)查在糾正錯誤方面的問題時县踢，表示硼啤，“我們可能由于國際丙曙、聯(lián)邦亏镰、區(qū)域索抓、省逼肯、州或其他司法條例的復(fù)雜性、多變性或不同的應(yīng)用和解釋为迈，而未能遵守這些條例“橛簦”
   6.越容易抱怨（填寫在線表格或發(fā)電子郵件的時候）焊傅，糾紛就越多狐胎。
   7.算法缺乏透明度導(dǎo)致了糾紛顽爹。
   8.越不注意防止產(chǎn)生糾紛镜粤，產(chǎn)生的糾紛就越大

Taking steps towards including Forth Party in Dispute Resolution

Ethan Katsh and Janet Riftkin’s book Online Dispute Resolution had introduced the concept of the fourth party, in which technology could play a dispute resolution role separate from the human third party. eBay following the concept decided to write a software program to assist the parties in resolving disputes and to involve neutrals only on an exceptional basis.

采取措施將第四方納入糾紛解決

Ethan Katsh和Janet Riftkin的書“在線爭議解決”引入了第四方的概念肉渴，書中的技術(shù)可以扮演與人類這一第三方分離的解決糾紛的角色同规。eBay遵循這一理念券勺，決定編寫一個軟件程序來幫助雙方解決糾紛关炼，并只在例外情況下引入中立者匣吊。

Much like EOS, eBay had a large influx of claims from many countries involved, the disputes were resolved faster with the help of Paypal as a partner following chargebacks mechanisms (A chargeback, also referred to as a payment dispute, occurs when a cardholder questions a transaction and asks their card-issuing bank to reverse it.)

和EOS非常相似社痛，eBay有大量涉及許多國家的理賠案件蒜哀，在合作伙伴Paypal的退款機(jī)制的幫助下咏雌，糾紛得到了更快速的解決。（退款寨典，也稱為支付糾紛耸成，發(fā)生在持卡人對交易提出質(zhì)疑并要求其發(fā)卡銀行撤銷交易的時候井氢。）

Chargebacks act like the collaterals/escrow which transfers money back (without any evidence) in the customer's account. The vendors have the burden of proving that the merchandise or service was given according to the contract terms, once that is proven the bank transfer effective payment to the vendor.

退款行為就像抵押/托管一樣花竞，在客戶的賬戶中轉(zhuǎn)回資金（沒有任何證據(jù)）约急。一旦證明銀行給賣方的付款是有效的厌蔽，賣方就有責(zé)任證明商品或服務(wù)是根據(jù)合同條款提供的奴饮。

Further Ebay took the staircase approach, beginning with problem diagnosis and working with the complainant, then using technology to assist negotiation and finally moving to an evaluation phase where eBay and its payment provider, PayPal, would decide the case if the transaction partners could not do so.

The complete structure brings trust, convenience, and technical expertise.

此外戴卜，eBay采取了階段式的方法叉瘩，他們和投訴人一起，從問題診斷開始攒磨，然后使用技術(shù)協(xié)助談判娩缰，最后轉(zhuǎn)移到一個評估階段拼坎，在這個階段，如果交易方不能決定债蓝，eBay和他的支付服務(wù)提供伙伴Paypal就會做出決斷饰迹。

這個完整的框架帶來了信任啊鸭，便利赠制，和技術(shù)專長钟些。

How could we have similar trust and convenience for regular users on EOS or a decentralized network without involving BPs?

In a decentralized network, it becomes difficult to implement chargebacks as one would need intervention by BPs to revert the transactions. The best way around the problem is trusting parties putting the bond or implementing transaction bonds on dApp level.

在沒有涉及BP們的情況下厘唾，我們?nèi)绾尾拍転镋OS或去中心化網(wǎng)絡(luò)上的常規(guī)用戶提供類似的信任和便利抚垃？

在去中心化的網(wǎng)絡(luò)中鹤树，因為恢復(fù)交易需要BP們的干預(yù)，所以退款變得困難叽讳。圍繞問題的最好方法是信任方將債券或交易債券放在dAppication級別岛蚤。

EOSMetal is working on introducing Bond Structure on EOS Network. Please read Tungsten introductory post to have more understanding around Bond/collateral here.

EOSMetal正致力于在EOS網(wǎng)絡(luò)上引入Bond結(jié)構(gòu)单雾。請閱讀Tungsten上的介紹硅堆，在這里了解更多關(guān)于Bond/擔(dān)保品的內(nèi)容够掠。

Bond/Collateral will help with trust and automation (staircase approach followed by eBay). Any claimant need not be at the mercy of BPs or emergency Arbitrators taking the action or use third party Escorws, he/she could claim and put forwards pieces of evidence in the time-period mentioned in the collateral.

Bond/抵押品將有助于信任和自動化（eBay遵循的階段式）祖屏。任何原告都不用受到BP或采取行動的緊急仲裁員或使用第三方Escorws的支配袁勺，他/她可以在抵押品中提到的時間段內(nèi)提交證據(jù)期丰。

Free Market Competition for Arbitration Forums

Competition among different forums incentives them to work efficiently and resolve disputes fast. It also drives innovation and convenient services to increase their market share. Further, with opt-in arbitration and free market competition, many forums located in different countries could help to lower the fees structure.

仲裁論壇的自由市場競爭

不同論壇之間的競爭激勵他們高效地工作，并且快速解決糾紛舶衬。它還推動創(chuàng)新和便利的服務(wù)來增加他們的市場份額。此外端辱，通過選擇仲裁和自由市場競爭虽画，不同國家的許多論壇可以幫助降低結(jié)構(gòu)費(fèi)用码撰。

A big shout out to EOS Network proposal “Free Market Competition for Dispute Resolution: {{Regarbitrator}}/{{Regforum}}”

對EOS網(wǎng)絡(luò)提案“糾紛解決的自由市場競爭：{{Regarbitrator}} / {{Regforum}}”的大力宣傳朵栖。

Mediation by Technology

There will always be a huge influx of similar disputes on the network which could be used for analytics and further for preparing the technology-driven questionnaire to guide claimant and making the whole process convenient. The questionnaire could help to filter the disputes and aid mediation using Technology based on precedents of similar claims.

技術(shù)調(diào)解

在網(wǎng)絡(luò)上總會有大量相似的糾紛柴梆，這些糾紛可以用于分析混槐，還可以進(jìn)一步用于準(zhǔn)備技術(shù)驅(qū)動的調(diào)查問卷，來指導(dǎo)索賠人轩性，并使整個過程變得方便。調(diào)查問卷可以幫忙對糾紛進(jìn)行過濾，并以之前相似的索賠案例為基礎(chǔ)使用技術(shù)進(jìn)行調(diào)解揣苏。

eBay follows a similar approach i.e in dispute a software collects the maximum data for evidence followed by mediation using the technology. Mediation is generally based on data derived from similar claims categorized into different categories like non-receipt, non-as-described etc. Different types help to structure pinpoint questions around claims, which assist with mediations and with filtration for human intervention.

eBay使用類似的方法悯嗓，即在爭議中，軟件最大限度對證據(jù)的數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行收集卸察，然后使用這種技術(shù)進(jìn)行調(diào)解脯厨。調(diào)解通常是基于從不同類別中收集的相似訴求的數(shù)據(jù)，例如非接收，非表述等。

不同的類型有助于圍繞訴求構(gòu)建精確的問題，這有助于調(diào)解和過濾人類干預(yù)在旱。

How would it all be implemented on EOS?

Let’s try to understand the process of taking an example -

1.Alice develops a dApplication and put a claimable bond (using Bond dApp) of value X naming an arbitration forum (which uses Technology as Forth Party).

2.Bob (non-tech savvy) looking at dApplication bond and certificates, buys some service from the dApp. Later he finds out that the services(or product) wasn’t offered as promised and ends up in a dispute with Alice’s dApplication.

3.Bob puts a claim against the Alice’s dApplications bond.

4.The mentioned Arbitration forums start collecting the pieces of evidence and puts a questionnaire for Bob. Bob puts all the pieces of evidence on public forums.

5.Looking at the evidences a software uses previous(similar) claims as precedent and put a suitable agreement/solution for Bob and Alice. If both parties agree to the solution, the claim gets resolved.

6.Unresolved claim steps up for human intervention and forum assigns Human Arbitrator.

7.If the award by arbitrator comes in favour of Bob, Arbitrator could enforce the ruling and transfer Token from the bond to Bob’s address without the need of Block Producer.

在EOS上怎樣實現(xiàn)

讓我們舉個例子試著理解這個過程

1.Alice開發(fā)了一個dApplication绍豁，并用一個價值X的索賠Bond命名（使用Bond dApplication）一個仲裁論壇（將自動科技作為第四方）芬位。

2.Bob（技術(shù)小白）看了dApplicaiton和證書，從這個dApplication上購買了一些服務(wù)狭握。之后他發(fā)現(xiàn)他購買的服務(wù)（或產(chǎn)品）并不是之前dApplication上保證的那樣恃疯，最終Bob就與Alice的dApplication發(fā)生了糾紛。

3.Bob對Alice的dApplication bond提出索賠雁仲。

4.之前提到的仲裁論壇開始手機(jī)證據(jù)并且給了Bob一份調(diào)查問卷。Bob將所有的證據(jù)放到了公共論壇上。

5.查看證據(jù)之后，軟件以之前相似的訴訟請求為先例，為Bob和Alice提供一份和解/解決方案醉拓。如果雙方都同意這個方案，這個訴訟請求就解決了傍念。

6.沒有解決的訴訟請求就交由人工處理忧陪，論壇會為他們分配人工仲裁員叶堆。

7.如果仲裁員做出的判決對Bob有利忘渔，那不需要由區(qū)塊鏈供應(yīng)商，仲裁員就可以執(zhí)行裁決并把令牌從債券轉(zhuǎn)移到Bob的地址。

For More information on Tungsten, please watch —

想了解更多Tungsten的信息椅棺，請看——

Metal05.png

Cryptolions are working on Bond dApplication as well, check out the interview to know more —

Cryptolions也在研究Bond dApplication，查看訪談以了解更多信息——

Metal06.png

Please drop any questions/feedback/suggestion on our Telegram Channel: https://t.me/@eosbond

如果有任何問題/反饋/建議遗菠，請發(fā)布在我們的Telegram頻道：https://t.me/@eosbond

本文圖片來源于英文原文