懂你英語Level 7 Unit 1 Part 2【Video 3: How Leaders Inspire Us】

TED Talk >> Simon Sinek: How great leaders inspire action?

Video 3: How Leaders Inspire Us 3


Most people don't know about Samuel Pierpont Langley.

And back in the early 20th century, the pursuit of powered man flight was like the dot com of the day. Everybody was trying it.

And Samuel Pierpont Langley had, what we assume, to be the recipe for success.

I mean, even now, you ask people, "Why did your product or why did your company fail?".

And people always give you the same permutation of the same three things.

Under-capitalized, the wrong people, bad market conditions.

It's always the same three things, so let's explore that.

Samuel Pierpont Langley was given 50,000 dollars by the War Department to figure out this flying machine.

Money was no problem.

He held a seat at Harvard and worked at the Smithsonian and was extremely well-connected.

He knew all the big minds of the day.

He hired the best minds money could find and the market conditions were fantastic.

The New York Times followed him around everywhere, and everyone was rooting for Langley.

And how come we've never heard of Samuel Pierpont Langley?

A few hundred miles away in Dayton, Ohio, Orville and Wilbur Wright.

They had none of what we consider to be the recipe for success.

They had no money; they paid for their dream with the proceeds from their bicycle shop;

not a single person on the Wright brothers' team had a college education, not even Orville or Wilbur;

and The New York Times followed them around nowhere.

The difference was, Orville and Wilbur were driven by a cause, by a purpose, by a belief.

They believed that if they could figure out this flying machine, it'll change the course of the world.

Samuel Pierpont Langley was different.

He wanted to be rich, and he wanted to be famous.

He was in pursuit of the result. He was in pursuit of the riches.

And lo and behold, look what happened.

The people who believed in the Wright brothers' dream worked with them with blood and sweat and tears.

The others just worked for the paycheck.

They tell stories of how every time the Wright brothers went out, they would have to take five sets of parts.

Because that's how many times they would crash before they came in for supper.

And, eventually, on December 17th, 1903, the Wright brothers took flight.

And no one was there to even experience it.

We found out about it a few days later.

And further proof that Langley was motivated by the wrong thing.

The day the Wright brothers took flight, he quit.

He could have said, "That's an amazing discovery, guys, and I will improve upon your technology," but he didn't.

He wasn't first, he didn't get rich, he didn't get famous, so he quit.

People don't buy what you do; they buy why you do it.

If you talk about what you believe, you will attract those who believe what you believe.


Exercises:

1. What did Sinek suggest by "back in the early 20th centry, the persuit of human powered flight was like the dot com of the day""?

> The pursuit of human powered flight was extremely popular.

2. If Langley had been motivated by purpose, what could he have done?

> improved the Wright brothers' flying machine

3. Why was Langley's situation more favorable than the Wright brothers'?

> He was better founded and had more connections.

4. If someone is well-connected, they know many influential people.

圖片發(fā)自簡書App

5. They believed that if they could figure out this flying machine, it'll change the course of the world.

6. To root for someone means to show support for them.




But why is it important to attract those who believe what you believe?

Something called the law of diffusion of innovation, if you don't know the law, you definitely know the terminology.

The first 2.5% of our population are our innovators.

The next 13.5% of our population are our early adopters.

The next 34% are your early majority, your late majority and your laggards.

The only reason these people buy touch-tone phones is because you can't buy rotary phones anymore.

We all sit at various places at various times on this scale.

But what the law of diffusion of innovation tells us is that if you want mass-market success or mass-market acceptance of an idea.

You cannot have it until you achieve this tipping point between 15 and 18 percent market penetration, and then the system tips.

I love asking businesses, "What's your conversion on new business?"

They love to tell you, "It's about 10 percent," proudly.

Well, you can trip over 10% of the customers.

We all have about 10% who just "get it."

That's how we describe them, right?

That's like that gut feeling, "Oh, they just get it."

The problem is: How do you find the ones that just get it before you doing business with them versus the ones who don't get it?

So it's this here, this little gap that you have to close, as Jeffrey Moore calls it, "Crossing the Chasm".

Because, you see, the early majority will not try something until someone else has tried it first.

And these guys, the innovators and the early adopters are comfortable with making those gut decisions.

They're more comfortable making those intuitive decisions that are driven by what they believe about the world and not just what product is available.

These are the people who stood in line for six hours to buy an iPhone when they first came out.

When you could've just walked into the store in the next week bought one off the shelf.

These are the people who spent 40,000 dollars on flat-screen TVs when they first came out, even though the technology was substandard.

And, by the way, they didn't do it because the technology was so great; they did it for themselves.

It's because they wanted to be first.

People don't buy what you do; they buy why you do it and what you do simply proves what you believe.

In fact, people will do the things that prove what they believe.

The reason that person bought the iPhone in the first six hours, stood in line for six hours,

was because of what they believed about the world, and how they wanted everybody to see them: they were first.

People don't buy what you do; they buy why you do it.


Exercises:

1. What is the law of diffution of inovation?

> It is a theory that seeks to explain how, why and at what rate new ideas and technology spread.


2. An intuitive decision is based on feelings rather than facts.

3. They're more comfortable making those intuitive decisions that are driven by what they believe about the world and not just what product is available.


Repeat & Read Sentences:

圖片發(fā)自簡書App

1. The innovators and the early adopters are comfortable with making those gut decisions.

2. The problem is: How do you find the ones that just get it before you doing business with them versus the ones who don't get it?

圖片發(fā)自簡書App

3. These are the people who spent 40,000 dollars on flat-screen TVs when they first came out, even though the technology was substandard.

4. They didn't do it because the technology was so great, they did it for themselves.

最后編輯于
?著作權(quán)歸作者所有,轉(zhuǎn)載或內(nèi)容合作請聯(lián)系作者
  • 序言:七十年代末羞迷,一起剝皮案震驚了整個濱河市,隨后出現(xiàn)的幾起案子颊亮,更是在濱河造成了極大的恐慌寺酪,老刑警劉巖,帶你破解...
    沈念sama閱讀 216,496評論 6 501
  • 序言:濱河連續(xù)發(fā)生了三起死亡事件否淤,死亡現(xiàn)場離奇詭異悟耘,居然都是意外死亡汤纸,警方通過查閱死者的電腦和手機(jī),發(fā)現(xiàn)死者居然都...
    沈念sama閱讀 92,407評論 3 392
  • 文/潘曉璐 我一進(jìn)店門骗绕,熙熙樓的掌柜王于貴愁眉苦臉地迎上來藐窄,“玉大人,你說我怎么就攤上這事酬土【H蹋” “怎么了?”我有些...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 162,632評論 0 353
  • 文/不壞的土叔 我叫張陵撤缴,是天一觀的道長东揣。 經(jīng)常有香客問我,道長腹泌,這世上最難降的妖魔是什么嘶卧? 我笑而不...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 58,180評論 1 292
  • 正文 為了忘掉前任,我火速辦了婚禮凉袱,結(jié)果婚禮上芥吟,老公的妹妹穿的比我還像新娘。我一直安慰自己专甩,他們只是感情好钟鸵,可當(dāng)我...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 67,198評論 6 388
  • 文/花漫 我一把揭開白布。 她就那樣靜靜地躺著涤躲,像睡著了一般棺耍。 火紅的嫁衣襯著肌膚如雪。 梳的紋絲不亂的頭發(fā)上种樱,一...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 51,165評論 1 299
  • 那天蒙袍,我揣著相機(jī)與錄音俊卤,去河邊找鬼。 笑死害幅,一個胖子當(dāng)著我的面吹牛消恍,可吹牛的內(nèi)容都是我干的。 我是一名探鬼主播以现,決...
    沈念sama閱讀 40,052評論 3 418
  • 文/蒼蘭香墨 我猛地睜開眼狠怨,長吁一口氣:“原來是場噩夢啊……” “哼!你這毒婦竟也來了邑遏?” 一聲冷哼從身側(cè)響起佣赖,我...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 38,910評論 0 274
  • 序言:老撾萬榮一對情侶失蹤,失蹤者是張志新(化名)和其女友劉穎记盒,沒想到半個月后茵汰,有當(dāng)?shù)厝嗽跇淞掷锇l(fā)現(xiàn)了一具尸體,經(jīng)...
    沈念sama閱讀 45,324評論 1 310
  • 正文 獨(dú)居荒郊野嶺守林人離奇死亡孽鸡,尸身上長有42處帶血的膿包…… 初始之章·張勛 以下內(nèi)容為張勛視角 年9月15日...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 37,542評論 2 332
  • 正文 我和宋清朗相戀三年蹂午,在試婚紗的時候發(fā)現(xiàn)自己被綠了。 大學(xué)時的朋友給我發(fā)了我未婚夫和他白月光在一起吃飯的照片彬碱。...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 39,711評論 1 348
  • 序言:一個原本活蹦亂跳的男人離奇死亡豆胸,死狀恐怖,靈堂內(nèi)的尸體忽然破棺而出巷疼,到底是詐尸還是另有隱情晚胡,我是刑警寧澤,帶...
    沈念sama閱讀 35,424評論 5 343
  • 正文 年R本政府宣布嚼沿,位于F島的核電站估盘,受9級特大地震影響,放射性物質(zhì)發(fā)生泄漏骡尽。R本人自食惡果不足惜遣妥,卻給世界環(huán)境...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 41,017評論 3 326
  • 文/蒙蒙 一、第九天 我趴在偏房一處隱蔽的房頂上張望攀细。 院中可真熱鬧箫踩,春花似錦、人聲如沸谭贪。這莊子的主人今日做“春日...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 31,668評論 0 22
  • 文/蒼蘭香墨 我抬頭看了看天上的太陽俭识。三九已至慨削,卻和暖如春,著一層夾襖步出監(jiān)牢的瞬間,已是汗流浹背缚态。 一陣腳步聲響...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 32,823評論 1 269
  • 我被黑心中介騙來泰國打工磁椒, 沒想到剛下飛機(jī)就差點(diǎn)兒被人妖公主榨干…… 1. 我叫王不留,地道東北人猿规。 一個月前我還...
    沈念sama閱讀 47,722評論 2 368
  • 正文 我出身青樓,卻偏偏與公主長得像宙橱,于是被迫代替她去往敵國和親姨俩。 傳聞我的和親對象是個殘疾皇子,可洞房花燭夜當(dāng)晚...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 44,611評論 2 353

推薦閱讀更多精彩內(nèi)容