8-3-3 The History of Our World

1

First, a video. Yes, it is a scrambled egg.?

But as you look at it, I hope you'll begin to feel just slightly uneasy.?

Because you may notice that what's actually happening is that the egg is unscrambling itself.?

And you'll now see the yolk and the white have separated.?

And now they're going to be poured back into the egg.?

And we all know in our heart of hearts that this is not the way the universe works. A scrambled egg is mush -- tasty mush -- but it's mush.?

An egg is a beautiful, sophisticated thing that can create even more sophisticated things, such as chickens.?

And we know in our heart of hearts that the universe does not travel from mush to complexity.?

In fact, this gut instinct is reflected in one of the most fundamental laws of physics, the second law of thermodynamics, or the law of entropy.

?What that says basically is that the general tendency of the universe is to move from order and structure to lack of order, lack of structure -- in fact, to mush.?

And that's why that video feels a bit strange.

And yet, look around us. What we see around us is staggering complexity.?

Eric Beinhocker estimates that in New York City alone, there are some 10 billion SKUs, or distinct commodities, being traded.?

That's hundreds of times as many species as there are on Earth.?

And they're being traded by a species of almost seven billion individuals, who are linked by trade, travel, and the Internet into a global system of stupendous complexity.


2

So here's a great puzzle: in a universe ruled by the second law of thermodynamics, how is it possible to generate the sort of complexity I've described, the sort of complexity represented by you and me and the convention center??

Well, the answer seems to be, the universe can create complexity, but with great difficulty.?

In pockets, there appear what my colleague, Fred Spier, calls "Goldilocks conditions" -- not too hot, not too cold, just right for the creation of complexity. And slightly more complex things appear.?

And where you have slightly more complex things, you can get slightly more complex things.?

And in this way, complexity builds stage by stage.?

Each stage is magical because it creates the impression of something utterly new appearing almost out of nowhere in the universe.?

We refer in big history to these moments as threshold moments.?

And at each threshold, the going gets tougher.?

The complex things get more fragile, more vulnerable; the Goldilocks conditions get more stringent, and it's more difficult to create complexity.

Now, we, as extremely complex creatures, desperately need to know this story of how the universe creates complexity despite the second law, and why complexity means vulnerability and fragility.?

And that's the story that we tell in big history.?

But to do it, you have do something that may, at first sight, seem completely impossible.?

You have to survey the whole history of the universe.?

So let's do it.

Let's begin by winding the timeline back 13.7 billion years, to the beginning of time.

Around us, there's nothing.?

There's not even time or space. Imagine the darkest, emptiest thing you can and cube it a gazillion times and that's where we are.?

And then suddenly, bang!?

A universe appears, an entire universe.?

And we've crossed our first threshold.?

The universe is tiny; it's smaller than an atom.?

It's incredibly hot.?

It contains everything that's in today's universe, so you can imagine, it's busting.?

And it's expanding at incredible speed.?

And at first, it's just a blur, but very quickly distinct things begin to appear in that blur.?

Within the first second, energy itself shatters into distinct forces including electromagnetism and gravity.?

And energy does something else quite magical: it congeals to form matter -- quarks that will create protons and leptons that include electrons.?

And all of that happens in the first second.?


Now we move forward 380,000 years.?

That's twice as long as humans have been on this planet.?

And now simple atoms appear of hydrogen and helium.?

Now I want to pause for a moment, 380,000 years after the origins of the universe because we actually know quite a lot about the universe at this stage.?

We know above all that it was extremely simple.?

It consisted of huge clouds of hydrogen and helium atoms, and they have no structure.?

They're really a sort of cosmic mush.?

But that's not completely true.?

Recent studies by satellites such as the WMAP satellite have shown that, in fact, there are just tiny differences in that background.?

What you see here, the blue areas are about a thousandth of a degree cooler than the red areas.?

These are tiny differences, but it was enough for the universe to move on to the next stage of building complexity.

And this is how it works.?

Gravity is more powerful where there's more stuff.?

So where you get slightly denser areas, gravity starts compacting clouds of hydrogen and helium atoms.?

So we can imagine the early universe breaking up into a billion clouds.?

And each cloud is compacted, gravity gets more powerful as density increases, the temperature begins to rise at the center of each cloud, and then, at the center, the temperature crosses the threshold temperature of 10 million degrees, protons start to fuse, there's a huge release of energy, and -- bam! We have our first stars.?

From about 200 million years after the Big Bang, stars begin to appear all through the universe, billions of them.?

And the universe is now significantly more interesting and more complex.

Stars will create the Goldilocks conditions for crossing two new thresholds.?

When very large stars die, they create temperatures so high that protons begin to fuse in all sorts of exotic combinations, to form all the elements of the periodic table.?

If, like me, you're wearing a gold ring, it was forged in a supernova explosion.?

So now the universe is chemically more complex.?

And in a chemically more complex universe, it's possible to make more things.?

And what starts happening is that, around young suns, young stars, all these elements combine, they swirl around, the energy of the star stirs them around, they form particles, they form snowflakes, they form little dust motes, they form rocks, they form asteroids, and eventually, they form planets and moons.?

And that is how our solar system was formed, four and a half billion years ago.?

Rocky planets like our Earth are significantly more complex than stars because they contain a much greater diversity of materials.?

So we've crossed a fourth threshold of complexity.?


3

Now, the going gets tougher.?

The next stage introduces entities that are significantly more fragile, significantly more vulnerable, but they're also much more creative and much more capable of generating further complexity.?

I'm talking, of course, about living organisms. Living organisms are created by chemistry.?

We are huge packages of chemicals.?

So, chemistry is dominated by the electromagnetic force.?

That operates over smaller scales than gravity, which explains why you and I are smaller than stars or planets.?

Now, what are the ideal conditions for chemistry? What are the Goldilocks conditions??

Well, first, you need energy, but not too much.?

In the center of a star, there's so much energy that any atoms that combine will just get busted apart again.?

But not too little.?

In intergalactic space, there's so little energy that atoms can't combine.?

What you want is just the right amount, and planets, it turns out, are just right, because they're close to stars, but not too close.

You also need a great diversity of chemical elements, and you need liquids, such as water.?

Why??

Well, in gases, atoms move past each other so fast that they can't hitch up.?

In solids, atoms are stuck together, they can't move.?

In liquids, they can cruise and cuddle and link up to form molecules.?

Now, where do you find such Goldilocks conditions??

Well, planets are great, and our early Earth was almost perfect.?

It was just the right distance from its star to contain huge oceans of liquid water.?

And deep beneath those oceans, at cracks in the Earth's crust, you've got heat seeping up from inside the Earth, and you've got a great diversity of elements.?

So at those deep oceanic vents, fantastic chemistry began to happen, and atoms combined in all sorts of exotic combinations.?


But of course, life is more than just exotic chemistry.?

How do you stabilize those huge molecules that seem to be viable??

Well, it's here that life introduces an entirely new trick.?

You don't stabilize the individual; you stabilize the template, the thing that carries information, and you allow the template to copy itself.?

And DNA, of course, is the beautiful molecule that contains that information.?

You'll be familiar with the double helix of DNA.?

Each rung contains information. So, DNA contains information about how to make living organisms.?

And DNA also copies itself.?

So, it copies itself and scatters the templates through the ocean.?

So the information spreads.?

Notice that information has become part of our story.?

The real beauty of DNA though is in its imperfections.?

As it copies itself, once in every billion rungs, there tends to be an error.?

And what that means is that DNA is, in effect, learning.?

It's accumulating new ways of making living organisms because some of those errors work.?

So DNA's learning and it's building greater diversity and greater complexity.?

And we can see this happening over the last four billion years.

For most of that time of life on Earth, living organisms have been relatively simple -- single cells.?

But they had great diversity, and, inside, great complexity.?

Then from about 600 to 800 million years ago, multi-celled organisms appear.?

You get fungi, you get fish, you get plants, you get amphibia, you get reptiles, and then, of course, you get the dinosaurs.?

And occasionally, there are disasters.?

Sixty-five million years ago, an asteroid landed on Earth near the Yucatan Peninsula, creating conditions equivalent to those of a nuclear war, and the dinosaurs were wiped out.?

Terrible news for the dinosaurs, but great news for our mammalian ancestors, who flourished in the niches left empty by the dinosaurs.?

And we human beings are part of that creative evolutionary pulse that began 65 million years ago with the landing of an asteroid.?


4

Humans appeared about 200,000 years ago.?

And I believe we count as a threshold in this great story. Let me explain why.?

We've seen that DNA learns in a sense, it accumulates information.?

But it is so slow.?

DNA accumulates information through random errors, some of which just happen to work.?

But DNA had actually generated a faster way of learning: it had produced organisms with brains, and those organisms can learn in real time.?

They accumulate information, they learn.?

The sad thing is, when they die, the information dies with them.?

Now what makes humans different is human language.?

We are blessed with a language, a system of communication, so powerful and so precise that we can share what we've learned with such precision that it can accumulate in the collective memory.?

And that means it can outlast the individuals who learned that information, and it can accumulate from generation to generation.?

And that's why, as a species, we're so creative and so powerful, and that's why we have a history.?

We seem to be the only species in four billion years to have this gift.

I call this ability collective learning.?

It's what makes us different.?

We can see it at work in the earliest stages of human history.?

We evolved as a species in the savanna lands of Africa, but then you see humans migrating into new environments, into desert lands, into jungles, into the Ice Age tundra of Siberia -- tough, tough environment -- into the Americas, into Australasia.?

Each migration involved learning -- learning new ways of exploiting the environment, new ways of dealing with their surroundings.

Then 10,000 years ago, exploiting a sudden change in global climate with the end of the last ice age, humans learned to farm.?

Farming was an energy bonanza.?

And exploiting that energy, human populations multiplied.?

Human societies got larger, denser, more interconnected.?

And then from about 500 years ago, humans began to link up globally through shipping, through trains, through telegraph, through the Internet, until now we seem to form a single global brain of almost seven billion individuals.?

And that brain is learning at warp speed.?

And in the last 200 years, something else has happened.?

We've stumbled on another energy bonanza in fossil fuels.?

So fossil fuels and collective learning together explain the staggering complexity we see around us.?


So -- Here we are, back at the convention center.?

We've been on a journey, a return journey, of 13.7 billion years.?

I hope you agree this is a powerful story.?

And it's a story in which humans play an astonishing and creative role.?

But it also contains warnings.?

Collective learning is a very, very powerful force, and it's not clear that we humans are in charge of it.?

I remember very vividly as a child growing up in England, living through the Cuban Missile Crisis.?

For a few days, the entire biosphere seemed to be on the verge of destruction.?

And the same weapons are still here, and they are still armed. If we avoid that trap, others are waiting for us.?

We're burning fossil fuels at such a rate that we seem to be undermining the Goldilocks conditions that made it possible for human civilizations to flourish over the last 10,000 years.?

So what big history can do is show us the nature of our complexity and fragility and the dangers that face us, but it can also show us our power with collective learning.

And now, finally -- this is what I want. I want my grandson, Daniel, and his friends and his generation, throughout the world, to know the story of big history, and to know it so well that they understand both the challenges that face us and the opportunities that face us.?

And that's why a group of us are building a free, online syllabus in big history for high-school students throughout the world.?

We believe that big history will be a vital intellectual tool for them, as Daniel and his generation face the huge challenges and also the huge opportunities ahead of them at this threshold moment in the history of our beautiful planet.

I thank you for your attention.

最后編輯于
?著作權(quán)歸作者所有,轉(zhuǎn)載或內(nèi)容合作請(qǐng)聯(lián)系作者
  • 序言:七十年代末闯参,一起剝皮案震驚了整個(gè)濱河市瞻鹏,隨后出現(xiàn)的幾起案子,更是在濱河造成了極大的恐慌鹿寨,老刑警劉巖新博,帶你破解...
    沈念sama閱讀 219,490評(píng)論 6 508
  • 序言:濱河連續(xù)發(fā)生了三起死亡事件,死亡現(xiàn)場離奇詭異脚草,居然都是意外死亡赫悄,警方通過查閱死者的電腦和手機(jī),發(fā)現(xiàn)死者居然都...
    沈念sama閱讀 93,581評(píng)論 3 395
  • 文/潘曉璐 我一進(jìn)店門馏慨,熙熙樓的掌柜王于貴愁眉苦臉地迎上來埂淮,“玉大人,你說我怎么就攤上這事写隶【笞玻” “怎么了?”我有些...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 165,830評(píng)論 0 356
  • 文/不壞的土叔 我叫張陵慕趴,是天一觀的道長痪蝇。 經(jīng)常有香客問我,道長冕房,這世上最難降的妖魔是什么躏啰? 我笑而不...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 58,957評(píng)論 1 295
  • 正文 為了忘掉前任,我火速辦了婚禮耙册,結(jié)果婚禮上给僵,老公的妹妹穿的比我還像新娘。我一直安慰自己详拙,他們只是感情好帝际,可當(dāng)我...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 67,974評(píng)論 6 393
  • 文/花漫 我一把揭開白布蔓同。 她就那樣靜靜地躺著,像睡著了一般胡本。 火紅的嫁衣襯著肌膚如雪牌柄。 梳的紋絲不亂的頭發(fā)上,一...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 51,754評(píng)論 1 307
  • 那天侧甫,我揣著相機(jī)與錄音珊佣,去河邊找鬼。 笑死披粟,一個(gè)胖子當(dāng)著我的面吹牛咒锻,可吹牛的內(nèi)容都是我干的。 我是一名探鬼主播守屉,決...
    沈念sama閱讀 40,464評(píng)論 3 420
  • 文/蒼蘭香墨 我猛地睜開眼惑艇,長吁一口氣:“原來是場噩夢(mèng)啊……” “哼!你這毒婦竟也來了拇泛?” 一聲冷哼從身側(cè)響起滨巴,我...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 39,357評(píng)論 0 276
  • 序言:老撾萬榮一對(duì)情侶失蹤,失蹤者是張志新(化名)和其女友劉穎俺叭,沒想到半個(gè)月后恭取,有當(dāng)?shù)厝嗽跇淞掷锇l(fā)現(xiàn)了一具尸體,經(jīng)...
    沈念sama閱讀 45,847評(píng)論 1 317
  • 正文 獨(dú)居荒郊野嶺守林人離奇死亡熄守,尸身上長有42處帶血的膿包…… 初始之章·張勛 以下內(nèi)容為張勛視角 年9月15日...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 37,995評(píng)論 3 338
  • 正文 我和宋清朗相戀三年蜈垮,在試婚紗的時(shí)候發(fā)現(xiàn)自己被綠了。 大學(xué)時(shí)的朋友給我發(fā)了我未婚夫和他白月光在一起吃飯的照片裕照。...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 40,137評(píng)論 1 351
  • 序言:一個(gè)原本活蹦亂跳的男人離奇死亡攒发,死狀恐怖,靈堂內(nèi)的尸體忽然破棺而出晋南,到底是詐尸還是另有隱情惠猿,我是刑警寧澤,帶...
    沈念sama閱讀 35,819評(píng)論 5 346
  • 正文 年R本政府宣布负间,位于F島的核電站偶妖,受9級(jí)特大地震影響,放射性物質(zhì)發(fā)生泄漏唉擂。R本人自食惡果不足惜,卻給世界環(huán)境...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 41,482評(píng)論 3 331
  • 文/蒙蒙 一檀葛、第九天 我趴在偏房一處隱蔽的房頂上張望玩祟。 院中可真熱鬧,春花似錦屿聋、人聲如沸空扎。這莊子的主人今日做“春日...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 32,023評(píng)論 0 22
  • 文/蒼蘭香墨 我抬頭看了看天上的太陽转锈。三九已至,卻和暖如春,著一層夾襖步出監(jiān)牢的瞬間贺纲,已是汗流浹背损晤。 一陣腳步聲響...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 33,149評(píng)論 1 272
  • 我被黑心中介騙來泰國打工, 沒想到剛下飛機(jī)就差點(diǎn)兒被人妖公主榨干…… 1. 我叫王不留砌溺,地道東北人影涉。 一個(gè)月前我還...
    沈念sama閱讀 48,409評(píng)論 3 373
  • 正文 我出身青樓,卻偏偏與公主長得像规伐,于是被迫代替她去往敵國和親蟹倾。 傳聞我的和親對(duì)象是個(gè)殘疾皇子,可洞房花燭夜當(dāng)晚...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 45,086評(píng)論 2 355

推薦閱讀更多精彩內(nèi)容

  • rljs by sennchi Timeline of History Part One The Cognitiv...
    sennchi閱讀 7,336評(píng)論 0 10
  • The Inner Game of Tennis W Timothy Gallwey Jonathan Cape ...
    網(wǎng)事_79a3閱讀 12,081評(píng)論 3 20
  • 朱子和王陽明的學(xué)問體系有何異同猖闪,這是學(xué)者不斷討論的問題鲜棠,我不揣淺薄,也想說說自己的一孔之見培慌。 朱...
    梅篆儒閱讀 671評(píng)論 2 3
  • 灸友分享: 一直也想分享點(diǎn)什么回報(bào)一下大家检柬,但是由于經(jīng)驗(yàn)不足献联,一直都是求助。經(jīng)過半年多的學(xué)習(xí)和實(shí)踐何址,終于我找到了一...
    艾學(xué)堂閱讀 697評(píng)論 0 2
  • 《詩經(jīng)·鄭風(fēng)·子衿》 青青子衿里逆,悠悠我心∮米Γ縱我不往原押,子寧不嗣音? 青青子佩偎血,悠悠我思诸衔。縱我不往颇玷,子寧不來笨农? 挑兮達(dá)...
    小小小小火閱讀 769評(píng)論 0 1