思考的價值在于提出好問題：當古希臘哲學家在討論究竟是什么力量使運動成為可能，以及什么才是第一推動力時，德謨克利特反問道缰贝，“為什么運動需要理由，而靜止就不需要任何理由筐钟？我們心理的理所當然會不會是一種天生的偏見？”
仔細想想看赋朦，我們是不是過于關注變化篓冲，而忽視了不變所需要具備的諸多條件？我們頭腦中的理所當然可能并不那么真的理所當然宠哄！
The value of thinking is to ask good questions: When the ancient Greek philosophers were discussing what forces made motion possible, and what was the primary driving force, Democritus asked rhetorically, “Why does motion need a reason, while stillness is No need for a reason? Could it be a natural prejudice that we take for granted?”
Come to think of it, are we focusing too much on change and ignoring the many conditions required to remain unchanged? What we take for granted in our minds may not be so true!
