How we're building a 22-mile-long park in the middle of a city

This picture is from my metro card when I spent a year abroad in Paris in college in the mid-'90s. My friend says I look like a French anarchist --

(Laughter)

But this is still what I see when I look in the mirror in the morning. Within a month of living in Paris, I'd lost 15 pounds and I was in the best shape of my life because I was eating fresh food and I was walking wherever I went.

Having grown up in suburban Atlanta, a region built largely by highways and automobiles and with a reputation as a poster child for sprawl, Paris fundamentally changed the way I understood the construction of the world around me, and I got obsessed with the role of infrastructure -- that it's not just the way to move people from point A to point B, it's not just the way to convey water or sewage or energy, but it's the foundation for our economy. It's the foundation for our social life and for our culture, and it really matters to the way that we live.

When I came home, I was instantly frustrated, stuck in traffic as I crossed the top end of our perimeter highway. Not only was I not moving a muscle, I had no social interaction with the hundreds of thousands of people that were hurtling past me, like me, with their eyes faced forward and their music blaring. I wondered if this was an inevitable outcome, or could we do something about it. Was it possible to transform this condition in Atlanta into the kind of place that I wanted to live in?

I went back to grad school in architecture and city planning, developed this interest in infrastructure, and in 1999 came up with an idea for my thesis project: the adaptation of an obsolete loop of old railroad circling downtown as a new infrastructure for urban revitalization. It was just an idea. I never thought we would actually build it. But I went to work at an architecture firm, and eventually talked to my coworkers about it, and they loved the idea. And as we started talking to more people about it, more people wanted to hear about it.

In the summer of 2001, we connected with Cathy Woolard, who was soon elected city council president. And we built a citywide vision around this idea: the Atlanta BeltLine, a 22-mile loop of transit and trails and transformation. I was doing two and three meetings a week for two and a half years, and so was Cathy and her staff and a handful of volunteers. Together, we built this amazing movement of people and ideas. It included community advocates who were used to fighting against things, but found the Atlanta BeltLine as something that they could fight for; developers who saw the opportunity to take advantage of a lot of new growth in the city; and dozens of nonprofit partners who saw their mission at least partly accomplished by the shared vision.

Now, usually these groups of people aren't at the same table wanting the same outcome. But there we were, and it was kind of weird, but it was really, really powerful. The people of Atlanta fell in love with a vision that was better than what they saw through their car windshields, and the people of Atlanta made it happen, and I guarantee you we would not be building it otherwise.

From the beginning, our coalition was diverse. People of all stripes were part of our story. People on the lower end of the economic spectrum loved it, too. They were just afraid they weren't going to be able to be there when it got built, that they'd be priced out. And we've all heard that kind of story before, right? But we promised that the Atlanta BeltLine would be different, and people took ownership of the idea, and they made it better than anything we ever imagined in the beginning, including significant subsidies for housing, new parks, art, an arboretum -- a list that continues to grow. And we put in place the organizations and agencies that were required to make it happen. And importantly, it is.

Now we're in the early stages of implementation, and it's working. The first mainline section of trail was opened in 2012, and it's already generated over three billion dollars of private-sector investment. But it's not only changing the physical form of the city, it's changing the way we think about the city, and what our expectations are for living there. About a month ago, I had to take my kids with me to the grocery store and they were complaining about it, because they didn't want to get in the car. They were saying, "Dad, if we have to go, can we at least ride our bikes?" And I said, "Of course we can. That's what people in Atlanta do. We ride our bikes to the grocery store."

(Laughter)

(Applause)

Thank you, yeah.

Now, they don't know how ridiculous that is, but I do. And I also understand that their expectations for Atlanta are really powerful.

This kind of transformation is exactly like sprawl in the last century, the movement where our investment in highways and automobiles fundamentally changed American life. That wasn't some grand conspiracy. There were conspiracies within it, of course. But it was a cultural momentum. It was millions of people making millions of decisions over an extended period of time, that fundamentally changed not only the way that we build cities, but it changed our expectations for our lives. These changes were the foundations for urban sprawl. We didn't call it sprawl at that time. We called it the future. And it was. And we got all the highways and strip malls and cul-de-sacs we wanted.

It was a radical transformation, but it was built by a cultural momentum. So it's important to not separate the physical construction of the places we live from other things that are happening at that time. At that time, in the second half of the last century, science was curing disease and lifting us to the moon, and the sexual revolution was breaking down barriers, and the Civil Rights Movement began its march toward the fulfillment of our nation's promise. Television, entertainment, food, travel, business -- everything was changing, and both the public and private sectors were colluding to give us the lives we wanted. The Federal Highway Administration, for example, didn't exist before there were highways. Think about it.

(Laughter)

Of course, today it's important to understand and acknowledge that those benefits accrued to some groups of people and not to others. It was not an equitable cultural momentum. But when we look today in wonder and disgust, maybe, at the metropolis sprawl before us, we wonder if we're stuck. Are we stuck with the legacy of that inequity? Are we stuck with this dystopian traffic hellscape? Are we stuck with rampant urban displacement, with environmental degradation? Are we stuck with social isolation or political polarization? Are these the inevitable and permanent outcomes? Or are they the result of our collective cultural decisions that we've made for ourselves? And if they are, can't we change them?

What I have learned from our experience in Atlanta is not an anomaly. Similar stories are playing out everywhere, where people are reclaiming not only old railroads, but also degraded urban waterways and obsolete roadways, reinventing all of the infrastructure in their lives. Whether here in New York or in Houston or Miami, Detroit, Philadelphia, Seoul, Hong Kong, Singapore, Toronto and Paris, cities big and small all over the world are reclaiming and reinventing this infrastructure for themselves, including the mother of all catalyst infrastructure projects, the Los Angeles River, the revitalization effort for which similarly started as a grassroots movement, has developed into a cultural momentum, and is now in the early stages of being transformed into some kind of life-affirming infrastructure again, this one with trails and parks and fishing and boating and community revitalization, and of course, water quality and flood control. It's already improving the lives of people. It's already changing the way the rest of us think about Los Angeles.

This is more than just infrastructure. We're building new lives for ourselves. It's a movement that includes local food, urban agriculture, craft beer, the maker movement, tech and design -- all of these things, early indicators of a really radical shift in the way we build cities. We're taking places like this and transforming them into this. And soon this.

And this is all exciting and good. We're changing the world for the better. Good for us! And it is awesome -- I mean that. But our history of sprawl, and from what we can already see with these catalyst projects today, we know and must remember that big changes like this don't usually benefit everyone. The market forces unleashed by this cultural momentum often include the seemingly unstoppable and inevitable cycle of rising taxes, prices and rents.

This is urgent. If we care, we have to stand up and speak out. This should be a call to action, because the answer can't be to not improve communities. The answer can't be to not build parks and transit and grocery stores. The answer can't be to hold communities down just to keep them affordable. But we do have to follow through and address the financial realities that we're facing. This is hard, and it won't happen on its own. We can do it, and I'm committed to this goal in Atlanta, to sticking up again for people who made it possible in the first place. We can't call it a success without them. I certainly can't, because the people I made commitments to all those years weren't abstract populations. They're my friends and neighbors. They're people that I love.

So even though it started as my graduate thesis and I'm working hard for 16 years with thousands of people to help make this thing come to life, I know and believe that who the BeltLine is being built for is just as important as whether it's built at all. Not just in Atlanta, but locally and globally, we have to understand this accountability to the people whose lives we are changing, because this is us. We are the lives we're talking about. These places aren't inevitable. The places we live aren't inevitable, and if we want something different, we just need to speak up. We have to ensure that change comes on our terms. And to do that, we have to participate actively in the process of shaping change.

Thank you.

最后編輯于
?著作權(quán)歸作者所有,轉(zhuǎn)載或內(nèi)容合作請(qǐng)聯(lián)系作者
  • 序言:七十年代末吃既,一起剝皮案震驚了整個(gè)濱河市取试,隨后出現(xiàn)的幾起案子惩阶,更是在濱河造成了極大的恐慌云芦,老刑警劉巖添祸,帶你破解...
    沈念sama閱讀 211,639評(píng)論 6 492
  • 序言:濱河連續(xù)發(fā)生了三起死亡事件趣苏,死亡現(xiàn)場離奇詭異歌懒,居然都是意外死亡茶袒,警方通過查閱死者的電腦和手機(jī),發(fā)現(xiàn)死者居然都...
    沈念sama閱讀 90,277評(píng)論 3 385
  • 文/潘曉璐 我一進(jìn)店門哈蝇,熙熙樓的掌柜王于貴愁眉苦臉地迎上來棺妓,“玉大人,你說我怎么就攤上這事炮赦×埽” “怎么了?”我有些...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 157,221評(píng)論 0 348
  • 文/不壞的土叔 我叫張陵吠勘,是天一觀的道長性芬。 經(jīng)常有香客問我,道長剧防,這世上最難降的妖魔是什么植锉? 我笑而不...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 56,474評(píng)論 1 283
  • 正文 為了忘掉前任,我火速辦了婚禮峭拘,結(jié)果婚禮上俊庇,老公的妹妹穿的比我還像新娘。我一直安慰自己鸡挠,他們只是感情好辉饱,可當(dāng)我...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 65,570評(píng)論 6 386
  • 文/花漫 我一把揭開白布。 她就那樣靜靜地躺著拣展,像睡著了一般彭沼。 火紅的嫁衣襯著肌膚如雪。 梳的紋絲不亂的頭發(fā)上备埃,一...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 49,816評(píng)論 1 290
  • 那天溜腐,我揣著相機(jī)與錄音,去河邊找鬼瓜喇。 笑死挺益,一個(gè)胖子當(dāng)著我的面吹牛,可吹牛的內(nèi)容都是我干的乘寒。 我是一名探鬼主播望众,決...
    沈念sama閱讀 38,957評(píng)論 3 408
  • 文/蒼蘭香墨 我猛地睜開眼,長吁一口氣:“原來是場噩夢啊……” “哼!你這毒婦竟也來了烂翰?” 一聲冷哼從身側(cè)響起夯缺,我...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 37,718評(píng)論 0 266
  • 序言:老撾萬榮一對(duì)情侶失蹤,失蹤者是張志新(化名)和其女友劉穎甘耿,沒想到半個(gè)月后踊兜,有當(dāng)?shù)厝嗽跇淞掷锇l(fā)現(xiàn)了一具尸體,經(jīng)...
    沈念sama閱讀 44,176評(píng)論 1 303
  • 正文 獨(dú)居荒郊野嶺守林人離奇死亡佳恬,尸身上長有42處帶血的膿包…… 初始之章·張勛 以下內(nèi)容為張勛視角 年9月15日...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 36,511評(píng)論 2 327
  • 正文 我和宋清朗相戀三年捏境,在試婚紗的時(shí)候發(fā)現(xiàn)自己被綠了。 大學(xué)時(shí)的朋友給我發(fā)了我未婚夫和他白月光在一起吃飯的照片毁葱。...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 38,646評(píng)論 1 340
  • 序言:一個(gè)原本活蹦亂跳的男人離奇死亡垫言,死狀恐怖,靈堂內(nèi)的尸體忽然破棺而出倾剿,到底是詐尸還是另有隱情筷频,我是刑警寧澤,帶...
    沈念sama閱讀 34,322評(píng)論 4 330
  • 正文 年R本政府宣布前痘,位于F島的核電站凛捏,受9級(jí)特大地震影響,放射性物質(zhì)發(fā)生泄漏芹缔。R本人自食惡果不足惜坯癣,卻給世界環(huán)境...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 39,934評(píng)論 3 313
  • 文/蒙蒙 一、第九天 我趴在偏房一處隱蔽的房頂上張望乖菱。 院中可真熱鬧,春花似錦蓬网、人聲如沸窒所。這莊子的主人今日做“春日...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 30,755評(píng)論 0 21
  • 文/蒼蘭香墨 我抬頭看了看天上的太陽吵取。三九已至,卻和暖如春锯厢,著一層夾襖步出監(jiān)牢的瞬間皮官,已是汗流浹背。 一陣腳步聲響...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 31,987評(píng)論 1 266
  • 我被黑心中介騙來泰國打工实辑, 沒想到剛下飛機(jī)就差點(diǎn)兒被人妖公主榨干…… 1. 我叫王不留捺氢,地道東北人。 一個(gè)月前我還...
    沈念sama閱讀 46,358評(píng)論 2 360
  • 正文 我出身青樓剪撬,卻偏偏與公主長得像摄乒,于是被迫代替她去往敵國和親。 傳聞我的和親對(duì)象是個(gè)殘疾皇子,可洞房花燭夜當(dāng)晚...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 43,514評(píng)論 2 348

推薦閱讀更多精彩內(nèi)容