下午最容易打瞌睡辽俗，所以在開始今天的論題前，分享幾則與比爾?蓋茨有關的笑話給大家篡诽，振奮下精神崖飘！

笑話一：論怎樣可以娶到比爾?蓋茨的女兒？

爹對兒子說霞捡，我想給你找個媳婦坐漏。

兒子說，可我愿意自己找碧信！

爹說赊琳，但這個女孩子是比爾?蓋茨的女兒！

兒子說砰碴，要是這樣躏筏，可以。

然后他爹找到比爾?蓋茨呈枉，說趁尼，我給你女兒找了一個老公。

比爾?蓋茨說猖辫，不行酥泞，我女兒還小啃憎！

爹說芝囤，可是這個小伙子是世界銀行的副總裁！

比爾?蓋茨說辛萍，啊悯姊，這樣，行贩毕！

最后悯许，爹找到了世界銀行的總裁，說辉阶，我給你推薦一個副總裁先壕！

總裁說瘩扼，可是我有太多副總裁了，多余了启上！

爹說邢隧，可是這個小伙子是比爾?蓋茨的女婿店印！

總裁說冈在，這樣呀，行按摘。

結尾語：世間許多生意就是這樣談成的包券。

笑話二：假如比爾?蓋茨來中國找工作……

某日，比爾?蓋茨來中國找工作炫贤，招聘人員問他：“你會用打印機傳真機么溅固？會掃地洗廁所么？”

蓋茨：“不會兰珍，但我會編程 侍郭。”

招聘員：“連這么簡單的活你都不會掠河，還敢大言不慚會編程亮元？我還不如花800元請個文盲∵肽。”

第二天爆捞，蓋茨再來求職：“我已經學會了使用打印機傳真機、掃地洗廁所勾拉≈笊”

招聘人員問他：“研究生學歷工資5000元，本科生3000元藕赞，你是什么學歷成肘？”

蓋茨：“我大學輟學，可是我會編程斧蜕∷簦”

招聘員：“那就是高中文憑啦，我們要求最低學歷是本科惩激〉晟罚”

第三天，蓋茨再來求職：“哈佛大學已經同意頒發(fā)榮譽博士學位給我了风钻∏牦埃”

招聘員問：“什么哈佛？沒聽過骡技！哈爾濱佛學院么鸣个？我們要求的是國內名牌大學的畢業(yè)生羞反。”

第四天囤萤，蓋茨：“中國清華大學已經同意頒發(fā)榮譽博士學位給我了昼窗。”

招聘員：“你會說至少兩門語言嗎涛舍？”

蓋茨：……

笑話三：我有錢我任性

比爾?蓋茨：“我昨天去銀行談貸款的事澄惊。”

喬布斯：“你要貸款干嘛富雅？”

比爾?蓋茨：“不是我要掸驱，是銀行要∶挥樱”

（兩人看著對方淫笑……）

娛樂的part已結束毕贼，現(xiàn)在回歸今天的主題，提到比爾?蓋茨蛤奢，我第一反應是：他對于軟件的貢獻鬼癣，就像愛迪生之于燈泡。我相信啤贩，大多數(shù)的人都跟我一樣的看法待秃，但，盡管如此瓜晤，比爾?蓋茨究竟是一個怎樣的人锥余，仍存在著各種爭議。

一方面：

他的身價曾經達到過900億美元痢掠，一直都是全世界人民心中的“世界首富”驱犹；

他創(chuàng)造的微軟市場價值曾經超過6000億美元，在很長一段時間內都被稱為是全球最成功的公司足画；

在他的帶領下雄驹，微軟創(chuàng)造了曾經全球最火的產品———Windows，幾乎每個人的生活淹辞、工作都離不開這款產品医舆；

作為全球最成功企業(yè)的leader，他要同時對付產業(yè)象缀、技術蔬将、法律、行政央星、華爾街等諸多問題霞怀，因此也被譽為擁有最強頭腦的人；

與此同時莉给，他建立了世界上最大的慈善機構毙石，又對外宣布不會把遺產傳承給自己的兒女廉沮，而是全數(shù)投入慈善事業(yè)，因此他又被稱為是世界上最慷慨的慈善家徐矩；

此外他還擁有最好的運氣滞时，一句話概況，他是地球上最成功的商人之一滤灯。

另一方面：

有人說他是世界上最貪婪的人———天天從股市里提款坪稽，還恨不得自己駕著F16戰(zhàn)斗機全世界打擊盜版；

有人說他是最無情的人———消費者已經為一個Office產品給他支付了400多億美元力喷，可還是漏洞百出刽漂；

有人說他是最兇狠的人———總是下意識地攻擊任何人、任何事弟孟；

有人說他是最虛偽的人———他的慈善舉措只是有史以來最昂貴的公關活動而已，為了收買民眾的好感样悟。

而回顧比爾?蓋茨的成長經歷拂募，發(fā)現(xiàn)他為了達到某些目的可以不擇手段，也就是時下最常說的“心機婊”：

高中時窟她，為獲得源代碼陈症，蓋茨曾經去翻垃圾箱；

為免費使用電腦震糖，蓋茨和艾倫黑了C-Cubed公司會計文件录肯；

高中時，蓋茨編寫排課程序將自己排在了全是女孩的班級吊说；

因為沒趕上飛機论咏，蓋茨曾劫持機場控制面板，并讓飛機返航颁井。

比爾?蓋茨于2008年正式從微軟退休了厅贪，但是退休后的比爾?蓋茨也沒有閑著，繼續(xù)做著他喜歡做的事情并且都很有趣雅宾，比如：

投資避孕套养涮，據說是新一代超薄避孕套，采用突破性材料眉抬，令其“非常非常薄”贯吓，感覺宛如皮膚，提升快感蜀变；

發(fā)起了“徹底改造馬桶”競賽悄谐，向8所知名大學的研究人員提供300萬美元，以重新設計瓷器“寶座”昏苏；

投資“人造雞蛋”尊沸，以雞蛋替代品做出餅干威沫、糕點、蛋黃醬洼专、蛋卷棒掠、吐司和煎蛋等蛋類相關食品，這項科技未來可能顛覆全球蛋類產業(yè)屁商；

用繩命來支持Janicki OmniProcessor——能將人的排泄物過濾凈化成飲用水的機器烟很，并在眾目睽睽之下，勇敢得喝掉了那杯“翔”蜡镶。

就是這樣一個亦正亦邪雾袱、做事不擇手段、喜歡探索新生事物的人官还，創(chuàng)造了微軟芹橡，成就了軟件界的一個傳奇。記得我在上小學時望伦，對美國林说、對電腦、對IT一點概念都沒有的時候屯伞，就知道了比爾?蓋茨這個人物腿箩，可見比爾?蓋茨在全球范圍內的影響力相當巨大。平時聽慣了國人對他的評價和膜拜劣摇，很好奇國外的民眾是如何評價比爾?蓋茨傳奇的一生以及他創(chuàng)造的微軟珠移。我們一起來看看！

觀點一：

In almost every metric, Bill Gates was a great CEO:

1.He created tens of thousands of high paying jobs and is a hero among the developers at Microsoft, even now.

2.He built an excess of $200b for the stockholders and MSFT had one of the dream runs in stock market history (from 1980 to 1999).

3.He brought PC and computing to the common man, and without his push it is arguable that the computing world would be a much different place.

4.He is a great philanthropist who has contributed a lot both to Seattle's local community (through United Way & others) and to the broader world.

5.While the tech world hates him, you have to accept that he is the most well-known CEO in the world. Even in the developing world, a random guy would know who Bill Gates is without knowing anything about the US economy or technology.

6.If there were no Bill Gates but just Apple & IBM, it is less likely that the computing revolution would have entered the developing world. In countries such as India, we would have never been able to afford the Mac or a proprietary IBM box on a larger scale. That means we would have continued to stay in poverty with no hope.

He was good for workers, customers, shareholders and society at large.

不管從哪方面看末融，比爾·蓋茨都是一個偉大的CEO：

1钧惧、他創(chuàng)造了成千上萬個高薪的崗位，他是微軟所有開發(fā)者中最偉大的英雄滑潘，即使是現(xiàn)在垢乙；

2、他為股東創(chuàng)造了超$200B的財富语卤，令微軟成為了股市歷史上難以逾越的神話（1980至1999年）追逮；

3、他讓計算機在千家萬戶中普及粹舵，沒有他的推動钮孵，計算機和互聯(lián)網是否可以達到現(xiàn)如今的地位，值得商榷眼滤；

4巴席、他是一個偉大的慈善家，他為西雅圖的當?shù)厣鐓^(qū)以及世界其他各個角落的慈善事業(yè)都做出了卓越的貢獻诅需；

5漾唉、盡管高科技屆有很多人恨他荧库，但還是不得不承認，他是世界上最知名的CEO赵刑。即使在發(fā)展中國家分衫，大多數(shù)的人都知道比爾?蓋茨，就算他們對美國的經濟或者技術一無所知般此；

6蚪战、如果沒有比爾?蓋茨，只有蘋果公司和IBM公司铐懊，計算機革命進入發(fā)展中國家是不可能的邀桑。比如在印度，我們無法大規(guī)模地去普及蘋果和IBM的產品科乎，這就意味著印度將繼續(xù)與貧困作戰(zhàn)壁畸，沒有希望。

綜上所述喜喂，比爾?蓋茨是一名優(yōu)秀的創(chuàng)造者瓤摧、客戶、股東和社會公民玉吁。

觀點二：

The reasons I think Bill Gates was a good CEO are:

1. As a visionary founder, he had nothing to prove to anybody, and had a natural appetite for undertaking new, innovative ventures. He never thought anything was impossible for Microsoft. He had a clear vision for Microsoft and delivered it:- making technology accessible to everybody. Whether it be a PC for every desk, or making it more accessible for you to buy databases, the underly philosophy of Bill Gates as about access. (today it is about universal access to health care and education). He made Microsoft into a company that changed the world and brought mass computing to people and businesses. If you measure the total increase in business and personal productivity over last two decades, probably a lot comes thanks to MSFT, directly or indirectly.

2. He was clearly able to hire and retain good people who balanced out his vision with good organization skills and solid business skills. Visionary founders often fail here: being able to recognize what they are not good at, and entrusting other people with their "baby".

3. He planned and was discplined about succession. It is very hard to replace the energy and vision of a founder. It is impossible to know the outcomes before the benefit of hindsight, but by all measures, Ballmer was a great choice: he loved the company as much, was highly competent, knew every detail about MSFT businesses, is smart and energetic. I think the issue is not with who Bill chose as his successor, the issue is with how Ballmer could have dealt with the unforeseen rise of Google, Facebook, Salesforce, etc.

我覺得比爾?蓋茨是一個偉大的CEO，理由如下：

1腻异、作為一個有遠見的創(chuàng)始人进副，他沒有任何東西可以證明給大家，對新生事物充滿探索的熱情悔常，是他唯一擁有的。他從沒想過對微軟來說有什么是不可能的。他對微軟有一個明確的愿景：讓技術造福每一個人砾跃。無論是作為一臺普通的計算機猿棉，或是用作數(shù)據庫，比爾·蓋茨的根本宗旨為連接這個世界残邀。（現(xiàn)在是關于醫(yī)療保健和教育的普及）皆辽。他讓微軟進入到每一個公司從而改變了世界。如果統(tǒng)計近二十年的企業(yè)和個人生產力的增加總量芥挣，我想驱闷，大部分的企業(yè)和個人都應該感謝微軟，微軟直接或間接的影響力是巨大的空免。

2空另、他顯然能夠雇用并留住那些有良好組織能力和扎實業(yè)務技能的優(yōu)秀人才。但有遠見的創(chuàng)始人往往會更加關注這個：能夠認識到員工并不擅長的方面蹋砚，并信任他們所擅長的扼菠。

3摄杂、對于繼任者，他非常重視并親自挑選循榆，這對于一名創(chuàng)始人來說析恢，是難以替代的能量和遠見。在事情還沒發(fā)生之前去預測結果是很難的冯痢，但是縱觀所有的決策氮昧，Ballmer是一個很不錯的選擇：他非常熱愛公司，非常能干浦楣，熟知微軟的每一個細節(jié)袖肥，聰明，精力充沛振劳。我覺得關鍵不在于比爾?蓋茨將選擇誰作為他的繼任者椎组，而在于Ballmer如何應對Google, Facebook, Salesforce這些公司不可預見的崛起。

觀點三：

Bill Gates and Steve Jobs are good analogues:brilliant, driven, broad in capacity for understanding and vision, with an inhuman capacity to consolidate information and lead. They both combined skillsets and personalities into one package that are only seen in rare intances across generations.

Anyone who had the pleasure of sitting in on one of the vaunted "BillG Reviews" back in the day knows what I mean. The Bill you see on TV is not the Bill that Microsoft saw behind closed doors. His energy, intellect, passion, ability to distill the most complex problems into basics in seconds while flinging a furious barrage of 'F' bombs, single handedly drove Microsoft until it could no longer, IMHO. Even Gates capacity couldn't scale to meet his model of success through micromanagement.

I personally feel he left because he knew this (and was likely burning out). Icontend it's a big part of the reason he won't come back - that and the Gates Foundation. He's got bigger fish to fry than worrying about a company that still makes lots of money.

比爾·蓋茨和史蒂夫·喬布斯有很多相似之處：卓越的能力历恐、奮發(fā)努力寸癌、極強的理解力、有遠見弱贼、有超出常人的獲取信息以及管理團隊的能力蒸苇。他們都是可以把技能和自己的性格特點結合在一起的人，這一點在歷史的河流中是極少見的吮旅。

任何一個以夸贊比爾?蓋茨的各種觀點為樂趣的人應該懂我的意思溪烤。你在電視上看到的比爾?蓋茨并不是微軟公司所看到的那個“閉門造車”的比爾?蓋茨。他的能量庇勃、智慧檬嘀、激情、能力以及瞬間將問題從復雜化為簡單的能力责嚷，讓他創(chuàng)造了微軟并靠他一個人的力量延續(xù)著這樣的神話鸳兽，即使微軟的輝煌已不在（恕我直言），即使現(xiàn)在比爾?蓋茨已經離開了微軟罕拂，無法再續(xù)寫他的成功傳奇揍异。

微軟輝煌已不在，我個人覺得他之所以會離開微軟聂受，是因為他深知這一點蒿秦。蓋茨基金會也是他不會再回來的另一大原因。比起擔心一個公司的運營蛋济，他還有更重要棍鳖、更偉大的事去做，而且這件事仍舊可以讓他賺很多錢。

觀點四：

Being from a completely non IT field. I'll take this one task of trying to answer this.

Bill Gates a good CEO for Microsoft

Why?

Look around and notice how the world has paced in the last few decades.Great engineering , Infrastructures, Fast cars,Modern Aircraft's carrying up to 850 passengers in its belly. All this happened in the last 3-4 decades. WOW!!!! Miss something in this? Something commonly referred to as a mobile phone revolution in the last decade.

Along with that came something very exciting , an IT revolution triggering millions of jobs worldwide.

Sure today we have Android dominating the mobile market and iOS followed next.The Stock price of Apple ever mounting,Google’s balance sheets increasing in sizable numbers year on year basis.Facebook and n number of successful start ups have led to this revolution in the IT industry and slowly moving in to the mobile industry.

All this said and written,We need to understand what was the driving force behind this revolution.

This Man started all this.

The reason we were able to move from

To this a little more than a decade later

And more recently to this

The single answer to this revolution is Microsoft led by Bill Gates.

Had there be no microsoft in the world or more specifically Windows in the world , we might still be either stuck with those giant IBM machines or those exsorbidantly priced Macintosh.

Performance of Microsoft when Bill Gates was the CEO.

In late 1999 Microsoft’s valuation reached some dizzying heights. And that was 15 years ago. On Dec. 27, 1999 Microsoft’s valuation hit an all-time record of more than $613 billion. In today’s dollars that would be more than $873 billion.

Yes those figures are correct, imagine how many fortunes were made simply because of this, How many jobs were created by this Software Giant!

All this under the vision of Bill Gates.

An un matched monopoly in the PC industry, Apple until late 2008 did not even more than 3% share in the global PC market. To create a product is one thing ,to sustain the company against it’s rival is another and to dominate the world with your product deserves a salute.

Bill gates was one of the greatest visionaries the world has ever seen and would ever see for a long long time.The amount of innovation given by Microsoft under his leadership is matchless during the 90’s.The amount of wealth created by Microsoft at it’s peak in 1999 is yet to matched by Apple(if we take inflation into account). Without Bill Gates the entire PC industry would not have been the same,He bought PC’s to the developing nations at a pace that no corporation could match.

All this when Bill Gates was the top boss at the Microsoft Headquarters.Could Microsoft had got a better CEO than him? NO Chance.

作為一個非IT行業(yè)的人渡处，我覺得比爾?蓋茨對微軟來說镜悉，是一個偉大的CEO，為什么医瘫？

回顧下歷史侣肄，過去的幾十年這個世界是以何種方式往前踱步的。偉大的工程醇份、基礎設施稼锅、跑車、已經可以運載850名乘客的現(xiàn)代飛機僚纷。所有的這些都發(fā)生在過去的30-40年矩距。哇！２澜摺锥债！遺漏了某些事？過去的十年間痊臭，還發(fā)生了一項重大革命哮肚，那就是移動電話的產生和普及。

除了這些广匙，還有一個更令人興奮的重大事件——一場造就了全世界范圍內數(shù)百萬個就業(yè)崗位的IT革命允趟。

如今，在移動電話市場鸦致，我們擁有了安卓和緊接著而來的IOS拼窥。蘋果的股票價格一直在增長，谷歌的資產也在以超快的增長速度逐年增長蹋凝。Facebook以及其他一大群成功的企業(yè)引領了這場IT革命，并且這場革命的影響力正逐漸轉移到移動互聯(lián)網行業(yè)总棵。

但是鳍寂，我們必須要明白到底是誰開創(chuàng)了這一項革命。

就是這個男人情龄。

理由有如下這些

還有這個

和這個

毫無疑問迄汛，由比爾?蓋茨帶領的微軟開創(chuàng)了這一項革命。如果沒有微軟骤视，或許我們現(xiàn)在只能用著那些巨大無比的IBM機器或者價格昂貴無比的計算機鞍爱。

比爾?蓋茨擔任微軟CEO期間，微軟的成就：

1999年底微軟的估值達到了一些令人目眩的高度专酗，注意這是15年前睹逃。在1999年12月27日，微軟的估值創(chuàng)下超過$6130億的空前紀錄。如果換算到現(xiàn)在沉填，將超過$8730億疗隶。

對，這些數(shù)字都是正確的翼闹，想象下斑鼻，多少人的命運因此得到了改變，這個軟件巨頭又因此為這個世界創(chuàng)造了多少工作機會猎荠。

所有的一切都是因為比爾?蓋茨坚弱。

在PC行業(yè)，從來都沒有過這樣的壟斷关摇，即使是蘋果荒叶，直到2008年，在全球的PC市場甚至沒有超過3%的份額拒垃。要創(chuàng)建一個產品是一回事停撞，而打敗競爭對手一直延續(xù)成功的神話是另一回事。更重要的是悼瓮，一個改變了這個世界的產品值得致敬戈毒。

比爾·蓋茨是世界上有史以來最偉大的夢想家之一，并且在未來很長很長一段時間內無人能超越横堡。在90年代埋市，比爾?蓋茨領導下的微軟做出的革新是其他公司都無法比擬的。微軟在它的高峰期1999年創(chuàng)造的財富可以與現(xiàn)如今的蘋果所創(chuàng)造的的財富一較高下（如果我們考慮到通貨膨脹）命贴。如果沒有比爾?蓋茨道宅，PC產業(yè)就沒有如今的輝煌，他將PC帶入了發(fā)展中國家胸蛛，這一點沒有人可以與他相提并論污茵。

所有的一切都是在比爾?蓋茨擔任微軟最高領導期間發(fā)生的。微軟還有可能出現(xiàn)一個比他更好的CEO嗎葬项？肯定不可能泞当。

觀點五：

A good rule of thumb is that anytime someone builds one of the most valuable companies of all time during their tenure as CEO, he or she was a good CEO.

一個好的經驗法則是，不管在什么時候民珍，不管是誰襟士，在其任職CEO的期間創(chuàng)造了這個世界上最有價值的公司之一，他或者她就是一個好的CEO嚷量。

觀點六：

Microsoft has been criticized for a long time for trying to kill the competition and also the open source community.

Windows is not open source but at least its not as restrictive as Mac OS or the "new" Windows is.

You can pretty much change the whole user interface of windows with the give APIs without knowing the source code.

Also that it also gives the freedom to save costs by going for a budget hardware or going for a PC of the brand you trust or the colour you want etc.

If I am a software engineer now and I can probably afford a mac or understand what computer is, its all because of the affordable Windows PC I used in my childhood.

If windows was not there, Apple would have eaten the personal computing world and everyone would be locked into its control.

All the credit goes to Bill Gates for this.

The guy basically told the world that Software is a separate entity and can be soldindependent of the hardware.

All Software engineers owe one to him, even if they hate him!

In Smartphone era, Apple did the same with iOS and but Windows joined the party very late.

but thank god Android came in and basically did the same thing or much more than what Windows did with PC.

gave people choice of hardware and price and that's what a common man wants. :)

微軟對于競爭者及開放資源的扼殺一直被批評了很長時間陋桂。

windows雖然不是開放的資源，但至少蝶溶，它沒有Mac OS的限制性嗜历，也不像“新的”windows那樣。

你可以在不知道源代碼的情況下改變應用程序的界面。

同時秸脱，不管你是要買一個在自己預算中的硬件或是一臺你信得過的牌子旗下的電腦亦或是你想要的顏色落包，它都可以給你很多空間去節(jié)省成本。

如果我是一名軟件工程師摊唇，現(xiàn)在我也許可以承受Mac或了解電腦的所有咐蝇，因為價格實惠的Windows PC代表著我的童年。

如果Windows不存在巷查，那么蘋果將成為電腦領域的統(tǒng)治者有序，每個人都將被其控制。

這一切全都歸功于比爾?蓋茨岛请。

這家伙基本上是告訴世人旭寿，軟件是一個獨立的實體，可以獨立于硬件出售崇败。

所有的軟件工程師都欠他一個人情盅称，即使他們恨他。

在智能手機時代后室，蘋果用IOS做了同樣的事情缩膝，可惜Windows入局太晚。

但是要感謝Android的出現(xiàn)岸霹，基本上做了與微軟同樣的事情疾层，甚至比微軟做得更多：給了人們選擇硬件和價格的機會，這正是一個普通人想要的東西贡避。:)

觀點七：

This is an astonishing question. Bill Gates made Microsoft. Microsoft didn't magically spring out of Zeus's head and find Bill Gates in the freezer section of CEO-Mart.

這是一個異乎尋常的問題痛黎。比爾?蓋茨創(chuàng)造了微軟。微軟并沒有奇跡般地從宙斯的腦袋里涌現(xiàn)出來刮吧，也沒有發(fā)現(xiàn)比爾?蓋茨“總裁超市”里的“冷柜部分”湖饱。

觀點八：

A better question is, was there ever a period of a whole month when Bill Gates was a bad CEO?

一個更好的問題是，請問在哪段時間里杀捻，比爾?蓋茨是一個不好的CEO琉历？

觀點九：

When I started my Microsoft career about 5 years back, Gates was long gone (address list listed him as a non-executive chairman when I searched on my first day), but there is something I noticed. Almost all the MS veterans I met spoke highly of him. They still does and they have their reasons.

To answer the question; in simple words, a company's enormous success when he was leading it will tell you how good a CEO was. If you dig deep, you'll be able to find a hundred reasons to say otherwise but hey, look at the company now, or, look at the desktops/laptops you see around. He has a significant hand in putting it all out there and making our lives easier.

當我開始我的微軟生涯時，他已經離開微軟了水醋。但有件事我注意到了，幾乎所有我認識的微軟的高層對他的評價都很高彪置。而且他們依舊在這樣做拄踪，因為他們有他們的原因。

要回答這個問題：簡單的說拳魁，在他的帶領下惶桐，一個公司獲得了巨大的成功，而這樣的成功正可以向你證明這個ceo有多偉大。如果深挖姚糊，你有一百個理由贿衍，比如，你看看你周圍的臺式機或者筆記本電腦救恨，他們就是最好的例子贸辈，他們讓我們的生活變得更容易。

觀點十：

I would argue that Bill Gates did an excellent job during the 80's and first part of the 90's, and an awful job from then on, leaving Steve Ballmer with one heck of a mess, including a terrible antitrust battle against the USA and EU (something which Intel largely avoided). Ballmer did a good job initially cleaning up Bill Gates' antitrust messes, and focusing the company on its key product lines, but failed to lead the company to catch up with a very fast moving industry. Both deserve a lot of blame for Microsoft's current poor strategic position and disastrous execution (such as Vista) -- being too tied to legacy businesses and not able to embrace the transition from PC generation to Internet.

我認為在80年代和90年代前半部分肠槽，比爾·蓋茨的工作很出色擎淤，但也從那時起他的工作變得更“可怕”，它讓史蒂夫·鮑爾默陷入了一堆亂局之中秸仙，包括對美國和歐盟的一個可怕的反壟斷戰(zhàn)役（英特爾在很大程度上避免了這個戰(zhàn)役）嘴拢。鮑爾默的工作做得很好，初步清理了比爾·蓋茨的反壟斷混亂寂纪，并著眼于公司最主要的產品線席吴，但未能帶領公司趕上這個快速發(fā)展的行業(yè)。微軟目前不佳的戰(zhàn)略地位和災難性的執(zhí)行力捞蛋，雙方都有責任——太依賴傳統(tǒng)業(yè)務孝冒，而沒有適應從PC到移動互聯(lián)網的過渡。

總結：

無可厚非襟交，比爾?蓋茨和他的微軟改變了這個世界迈倍，沒有人可以否定他的價值。不管是國內國外捣域，在民眾的眼里啼染，他都是神一般的存在，而那些個爭議的背后也許都是赤裸裸的嫉妒吧焕梅！這個世界就像是一個劇場迹鹅，每個人都在里面扮演著屬于自己的角色，相比我們這些普通人贞言，比爾?蓋茨所扮演的角色更重要戲份更多斜棚。但是，當人站在了一定的高度该窗，得到了無數(shù)掌聲和鮮花的同時弟蚀，也會伴隨無數(shù)的爭議。人非圣賢酗失，孰能無過义钉，不管比爾?蓋茨是不是一個心機婊，他的確是成功了规肴，而且是前無古人后無來者的成功捶闸，他將被永遠載入史冊夜畴。或許他本人也根本不會在意這些個爭議删壮，不管外界如何評論他贪绘，他非常非常非常有錢這一個事實，是無法改變的央碟。這是個“我有錢我就牛逼”的時代税灌，毫無疑問！