In Madhya Pradesh, Sanskrit Textbook Says India Won The 1962 War Against China
印度梵文教科書妄稱：1962年印度戰(zhàn)勝了中國
With Indian and Chinese troops standing eyeball to eyeball at Doklam, a Sanskrit book being taught in several CBSE-affiliated schools in Madhya Pradesh is telling students that India won the 1962 war.
據(jù)《印度時報》網(wǎng)站8月10日的消息：日前埃脏，中印軍隊在洞朗地區(qū)對峙彩掐。而印度中央邦教育中央委員會部分附屬中學(xué)的學(xué)生所接受的教育卻是：印度在1962的年戰(zhàn)爭中擊敗了中國堵幽。
聲稱印度贏了1962年戰(zhàn)爭的教科書截圖
"What famously came to be known as Sino-India war of 1962 was won by India against China," this is the sweeping claim in the Sanskrit textbook 'Sukritika', volume-3, meant for class 8 students.
這是一本名為“Sukritika”系列教科書中的第三冊，是8年級學(xué)生的教材殴胧。該書一概而論地聲稱：“眾所周知的1962年中印戰(zhàn)爭佩迟，其結(jié)果是印度戰(zhàn)勝了中國报强√衫裕”
聲稱印度贏了1962年戰(zhàn)爭的教科書截圖
Published by the Lucknow-based, Kriti Prakashan Pvt Ltd, the book is written by five authors, including professor Umesh Prasad Rastogi and grammar expert Somdut Shukla, both of whom have passed away.
印度勒克瑙市的克里特博卡山公司是該教科書的出版商。本書共由5名作者撰寫诗充，其中尤曼什·普拉薩德?拉斯托吉教授蝴蜓、語法專家索姆達(dá)特·舒卡拉尚已去世格仲。
印度中學(xué)生（資料圖）
The three others include Madhu Singh, Lalita Sengar and Nisha Gupta. The bizarre misinformation appears in the eighth chapter, titled, 'Shri Jawaharlal Nehru'. Listing Nehru's achievements, it narrates how the first PM of India mobilised forces and morale after China invaded India. "During Jawaharlal Nehru's tenure as Prime Minister, China waged war against India in the year 1962. With efforts of Nehru, India defeated China," the book says.
令人匪夷所思的錯誤說法赫然出現(xiàn)在該書第八章“尼赫魯先生”一文中谊惭。文章列出了尼赫魯?shù)闹T多成就侮东，講述中國“入侵”印度之后悄雅，印度首任總理如何調(diào)動三軍和提振士氣宽闲。文章聲稱便锨，“在尼赫魯總理執(zhí)政期間，中國在1962年對印度發(fā)動了戰(zhàn)爭姚建，但在尼赫魯?shù)呐ο拢《葥魯×酥袊仰ā！?/p>
And thousands of schoolkids are growing up with this distortion of history. The 1962 War took India by surprise and although Indian soldiers often fought to the last man and last round, it was a Chinese victory.
數(shù)以千計的學(xué)生在這種被扭曲的歷史下成長饺藤。1962年的戰(zhàn)爭讓印度猝不及防涕俗，盡管印度士兵經(jīng)常戰(zhàn)斗到最后一人再姑、最后一刻找御，但那是一場屬于中國人的勝利。
TOI tried repeatedly to contact the publishers but there was no answer. The three other authors couldn't be contacted. The head of Sanskrit department of Lucknow University, Ram Sumir Yadav, told TOI that Prof Rastogi passed away last year."I can't comment on what he has written in the book," he said.
《印度時報》多次嘗試聯(lián)系出版商讨永，但未獲回復(fù)住闯。其他在世的3名作者也聯(lián)系不上澳淑。勒克瑙大學(xué)梵語系系主任拉姆·蘇米爾·亞達(dá)夫在接受《印度時報》采訪時表示，尤曼什·普拉薩德?拉斯托吉教授于去年逝世杠巡。他說：“我對他在書中所寫的內(nèi)容不予評論“鐾”
Teachers and parents are outraged by this misinformation in a school textbook. Madhya Pradesh Parents' Association secretary Prabodh Pandya said: "This is exactly what we have been fighting over for years but unfortunately our pleas fell on deaf ears. How much proof does government need to say no to books by private publishers? Isn't this blooper serious enough to make NCERT books mandatory?" said Pandya.
許多印度教師和家長對教課書中出現(xiàn)的謬誤表示憤慨嫩海。中央邦家長聯(lián)合會秘書潘狄亞說：“實際上我們也在要求更正教材，但很不幸我們的請求卻被當(dāng)作耳旁風(fēng)叁怪。印度政府到底需要多少證據(jù)才能禁止私人出版商的教科書呢？難道這一荒唐的錯誤還不足以讓國家統(tǒng)一審訂教材嗎涣觉？”
