今天小編在查看文獻(xiàn)的時候搜骡，一不小心看到了一篇撤稿通知，點(diǎn)開細(xì)節(jié)查看發(fā)現(xiàn)基本上同一張生存曲線圖發(fā)了8篇SCI佑女，而這8篇SCI都是來自國內(nèi)不同單位的作者记靡，而且發(fā)表的年份也不太相同。具體的情況如下：
首先团驱，看到Retraction notice to “Interleukin-36 receptor antagonist is associated with the progression of renal cell carcinoma” [Int. Immunopharmacol. 84 (2020) 106474]在今年3月份初出版簸呈，然后不小心點(diǎn)看到了撤稿通知具體內(nèi)容：主要是文章的生存曲線圖和Cox回歸的表格與別的文章存在嚴(yán)重的重復(fù)性，下面是官方原文的撤稿詳情：
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal).
This article has been retracted at the request of the Editor-in-Chief.
This article has similarities to seven other papers that have been published. They have similar Kaplan-Meier curves, and tables and table values. These similar graphics and tables apply to different disease states, target mediators and numbers of patients in different studies.
After the comments of Dr Elisabeth Bik https://pubpeer.com/publications/39A1613F4546DA16064BA441B29A0F regarding this article, the journal requested the author to provide the raw data.?However, the author did not respond.
Dr. Elisabeth Bik is acknowledged for pointing out the irregularities in these papers.
具體圖片重復(fù)性細(xì)節(jié)如下：
很明顯這些文章都是由同一個第三機(jī)構(gòu)生產(chǎn)的店茶，相當(dāng)于一份數(shù)據(jù)繪制的圖片發(fā)了多篇SCI，連圖片的顏色都不改一下劫恒。估計(jì)像這種文章還有很多很多贩幻，目前發(fā)現(xiàn)的只是冰山一角轿腺。
參考鏈接（期刊撤稿鏈接）：
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567576921001193?via%3Dihub
Dr. Elisabeth Bik分析細(xì)節(jié)參考鏈接：
https://pubpeer.com/publications/39A1613F4546DA16064BA441B29A0F
