4.
Premise: All people obeying the law will stay out of trouble with the police.
Premise: some people have managed to stay out of trouble with the police.
Conclusion:So those people don't go ground breaking the law.
Attack : The arguer treats the premise as a necessary condition in the argument. As a matter of fact, not all people will obey the law if they don't want to stay in trouble with the police, it's not the only way to stay out of trouble with the police to many people, that's why the argument should be attacked.
5.
Premise: Any person who is given a proper upbringing by one's parents will treat others with respect.
Premise: A person treats others with respect.
Conclusion: The person has indeed been given a proper upbringing.
Attack: Obviously, a person can learn something good like treating others with respect from the family. However, treeing others with respect can be learned not only from the family but also in school and in society even just talking with others. That’s why a person who has been given a proper upbringing just a sufficient condition but not a necessary condition.
