資料:New York Times Eyes Ambitious Overhaul InQuest For 'Journalistic Dominance'

New York Times Eyes Ambitious Overhaul InQuest For 'Journalistic Dominance'

huffingtonpost.com

February 4 12:00 PM

NYT executive editor Dean Baquet says thepaper needs to figure out how to apply its "timeless values to a newage."

NEW YORK -- The New York Times, at age 164,has kept pace with today's media upstarts while remaining committed tohigh-quality journalism. The company admitted?its innovation

shortcomingsa couple years back, but these days the newsroom is rife with experimentation in things like visual storytelling, podcasting,reader engagement and?virtual reality.

Now, executive editor Dean Baquet toldstaff Tuesday, "it is time to catch our breath and come up with a sharedvision for what our report, and ultimately the New York Times newsroom, shouldlook like in the coming years."

In a memo, Baquet said he will work withtop masthead editors to examine the

newsroom's structureand that he has tapped David Leonhardt to help leadthe effort. Leonhardt, a prominent economics writer and founding editor of TheUpshot, wasrecently nameda columnist, but now the start of that column will be delayed until the summer.

Baquet

applauded his staff's recent innovation efforts,but stressed that it's important to figure out what's working and what

isn't in order to determine the best course forward.

"Experimenting with new forms ofjournalism and presentation has sparked tremendous creativity in thenewsroom," he wrote. "But in trying to balance the new and the old,reporters and editors are sometimes left exhausted and confused.Simply put, we keep turning things on

-- greater visual journalism, live news blogs, faster enterprise, podcasting,

racing against an ever-growing list of new competitors on an expanding list of

stories – without ever turning things off."

"We need to develop a strategic planfor what The New York Times should be, and determine how to apply our timelessvalues to a new age," Baquet added.

In the memo, Baquet discussed how the Timescurrently determines which stories should warrant the paper's full arsenal ofdigital, print and visual resources and whether the current desk structure --Metro, National, International and others -- is best way to tackle big storieslike climate change and education. He posed a number of questions which,presumably, he and others involved will hope to answer in the coming months.

"We deeply value the craft of editing,but in thedigital era should we continue to edit every update of every story at the samelevel?" he asked.

"How much of our coverage isduplicative because we have never resolved overlapping jurisdictions? Whichparts of our newsroom have not grown quickly enough? How will the newsroomchange as it becomes more internationally focused?"

This deep,

structural examination could lead to some cuts.

The Times has bucked the trend among legacy newspaper companies by?maintaining??robust,??1,300-person newsroom-- even after several rounds of layoffsand buyouts. Banquet?recently told?public editor Margaret Sullivanthat "given the reality of the journalism world we’re in, we certainly can’t get any bigger and we probably have to get a little smaller."

In Tuesday's memo, Baquet wrote that the breadth and depth of the staff is "the bedrock of our mission and our business," but acknowledged that the company "has to look for judicious savings everywhere, and that includes the newsroom."

Still, he wrote, "instead of cuts andadditions without a clear picture of where we are headed, we want to approachthe task thoughtfully, with our mission and values clearly in mind."

"Everything we do must either be partof that mission or helpgenerate

the revenue to sustain our journalistic dominance," he continued."We must turn some things off, and build up the areas that set us apart.We must cast a fresh eye on our coverage to determine whether some of itreflects old habits rather than the urgent goal of telling our readers whatthey most need to know.

Read Baquet's full memo below:

To the newsroom:

We accomplished so much in the past year.

Our stories had huge impact on the world.The power of the richest campaign donors is being ferociously debated becauseof our political coverage. The military is investigating whether Navy SEALsplayed a role in the death of an Afghan civilian. Our series on secret realestate deals has led to significant changes in disclosure rules. Our exposes ofNew York’s dysfunctional prisons have set the agenda. And our coverage ofAmazon forced a searing discussion about the modern workplace.

Our magazines continue to produce powerfulstorytelling on beautiful pages. Our forays into virtual reality and podcastingshow we can succeed at new ventures while maintaining our values. We’ve broughta new generation of critics into our Culture report.

In ways large and small, the newsroom isexperimenting and adapting as we move into our digital future. We are revampingour video unit. The news hub is beginning to free desks to focus on coveragewithout being consumed by print deadlines. We have begun a desk-by-desk digitaltraining regimen. We have gone from being largely unaware of our audience’schanging habits to making them an integral part of our daily conversations. Inour news meetings we talk ofcoverage, regardless of platform. More and more wediscuss how to highlight all kinds of stories -- video, multimedia, thepolitics desk’s great voices feature -- that are more digital than print. Wedebate openly and freely as we experiment with new ways of telling stories. Theconversational writing of the Upshot is making its way into the rest of ourcoverage.

Our stellar coverage of the Paris attacksprovided a powerful illustration of a transformed newsroom, one that uses everytool – old and new – to cover a giant story.

Readers notice. Our subscriber basecontinues to grow at an astounding pace, now over two million in 193 countries.Our audience has never been larger. Our readers show they value our work bypaying good money for it, in print and online. They also give us something evenmore valuable: their time. They linger on our best work, reading longnarratives and engaging with beautiful interactives.

Experimenting with new forms of journalismand presentation has sparked tremendous creativity in the newsroom. But intrying to balance the new and the old, reporters and editors are sometimes leftexhausted and confused. Simply put, we keep turning things on -- greater visualjournalism, live news blogs, faster enterprise, podcasting, racing against anever-growing list of new competitors on an expanding list of stories – withoutever turning things off.

It is time to catch our breath and come upwith a shared vision for what our report, and ultimately the New York Timesnewsroom, should look like in the coming years. Working with the top mastheadeditors – Matt, Susan, Janet, Tom and Kinsey -- I will be leading an effortthis year to think through how the newsroom should continue on its path tochange.

I’ve asked David Leonhardt to help me carryout this examination across the newsroom. His experience creating and leadingthe Upshot has taught him to ask provocative questions about how we do businessand how we serve readers. Andy has generously agreed to let David delay thestart of his new column until the summer. And Andy himself will be a keyparticipant in our discussions.

We need to develop a strategic plan forwhat The New York Times should be, and determine how to apply our timelessvalues to a new age. What breaking stories demand even more of our attention,and which ones are not quite important enough to warrant our full digital,print and visual resources? Does our system of powerful desks help us cover bigstories that don’t easily have a home --- like climate change and education ---or does it sometimes get in the way? We deeply value the craft of editing, butin the digital era should we continue to edit every update of every story atthe same level?

How much of our coverage is duplicativebecause we have never resolved overlapping jurisdictions? Which parts of ournewsroom have not grown quickly enough? How will the newsroom change as itbecomes more internationally focused?

We are not starting from scratch. We havespent the last couple of years wrestling with these questions in various partsof the newsroom. By way of example, Joe Kahn and his colleagues onInternational have been working to create a truly global digital news operationthat greatly expands our audience throughout the world.

Of course cost is a factor in thisexercise. The business is changing. Although our digital revenue is growingstrongly, we continue to feel the impact of declines in parts of our printbusiness. That means the company must continue to carefully manage its costs.

Our newsroom today is larger than it hasever been. Everyone – from the top of the company down – believes thatmaintaining the country’s most robust and powerful newsroom is essential. Thestrength of our newsroom is not just the bedrock of our mission and ourbusiness, but it also differentiates us from our competitors. But the simplefact is that to secure economic success and the viability of our journalism inthe long term, the company has to look for judicious savings everywhere, andthat includes the newsroom.

Instead of cuts and additions without aclear picture of where we are headed, we want to approach the taskthoughtfully, with our mission and values clearly in mind. Everything we domust either be part of that mission or help generate the revenue to sustain ourjournalistic dominance. We must turn some things off, and build up the areasthat set us apart. We must cast a fresh eye on our coverage to determinewhether some of it reflects old habits rather than the urgent goal of tellingour readers what they most need to know.

I also want to be clear that I believe TheTimes of the future can and should be even better than The Times of today. Wewant to continue to build on our tradition of innovation. We want to free upour best journalists to be even more nimble, dynamic and innovative in coveringthe biggest breaking news. We want to show even greater expertise in coveringthe pivotal subjects that matter most to our readers and to the world – notonly government and politics and business and national security, but alsoculture and science and fashion and sports. We want to understand our readers,without becoming enslaved to metrics. We want to remain the newsroom whereother journalists aspire to work. We want to build the premier global newsoperation. And we want to enhance our status as the premier visual newsorganization, and lead the journalism world in narrative and investigativereporting.

Anyone who compares today’s version of TheTimes to a version from the good old days quickly sees how much strongertoday’s is. My goal is to ensure that our successors will edit a report that isbetter yet.

I recently spent two full days with theleaders of the Times Company, including Arthur, Mark, Michael, Andy and othermembers of the executive team. The subject was our future, and the company’sambitious goal of doubling digital revenue in five years.

It was a remarkable discussion. I came awaywith the deep understanding that the reason we will survive and thrive is thateveryone is committed to preserving The Times as a great and large newsorganization. To a degree that is astonishing in modern business, theOchs-Sulzberger family has demonstrated its ongoing commitment over manydecades. Like all of us, they believe profoundly that the future of The NewYork Times lies in its being the finest news organization in the world.

Dean

資料:紐約時(shí)報(bào)2015年四季報(bào)及年報(bào)電話說明會(huì)紀(jì)要

Feb.?4,?2016?4:29?PM?ET|?About:New?York?Times?Co.?(NYT)

Operator

Good?morning.?My?name?is?Mike,?and?I?will?be?your?conference?operator?today.?At?this?time,?I?would?like?to?welcome,?everyone,?toThe?New?York?Times?Company?Q4?and?Full?Year?2015?Conference?Call.?All?lines?have?been?placed?on?mute?to?prevent?any?background?noise.?After?the?speakers'?remarks,?there?will?be?a?question-and-answer?session.?Thank?you.

I?will?now?turn?the?call?over?to?Harlan?Toplitzky,?Executive?Director?of?Financial?Planning?and?Analysis.?You?may?begin?your?conference.

Harlan?Toplitzky?-?Executive?Director?of?Financial?Planning?&?Analysis

Thank?you,?and?welcome?to?The?New?York?Times?Company's?fourth?quarter?and?full-year?2015?earnings?conference?call.?On?the?call?today,?we?have?Mark?Thompson,?President?and?Chief?Executive?Officer;?Jim?Follo,?Executive?Vice?President?and?Chief?Financial?Officer;?and?Meredith?Kopit?Levien,?Executive?Vice?President?and?Chief?Revenue?Officer.

Before?we?begin,?I?would?like?to?remind?you?that?management?will?make?forward-looking?statements?during?the?course?of?this?call?and?our?actual?results?could?differ?materially.?Some?of?the?risks?and?uncertainties?that?could?impact?our?business?are?included?in?our?2014?10-K.?In?addition,?our?presentation?will?include?non-GAAP?financial?measures?and?we?have?provided?reconciliations?to?the?most?comparable?GAAP?measures?in?our?earnings?press?release,?which?is?available?on?our?website?at?investors.nytco.com.

With?that,?I?turn?the?call?over?to?Mark?Thompson.

Mark?J.?T.?Thompson?-?President,?Chief?Executive?Officer?&?Director

Thanks,?Harlan,?and?good?morning,?everyone.?Well,?as?you?can?see?from?the?results?we?released?this?morning,?we?had?a?strong?quarter?and?an?encouraging?2015,?andwe?begin?2016?with?high?hopes?for?the?future.

Let?me?deal?first?with?the?quarter,?briefly?review?the?past?year?as?a?whole,?and?then?turn?to?2016?and?beyond.

In?Q4?2015,?we?saw?adjusted?operating?profit?of?$118?million,?a?13%?increase?versus?the?prior?year,driven?by?solid?growth?in?digital?advertisingand?consumer?revenues,?as?well?as?good?cost?management.

We?had?another?quarter?of?strong?net?gains?in?digital-only?subscriber?numbers,?with?an?additional?net?53,000?subscribers.?It?was?the?biggest?quarterly?addition?for?three?years?and?represented?a?20%?growth?in?subscriber?numbers,?compared?with?the?same?quarter?in?2014.

Continued?improvement?in?retention?and?growth?of?international?subscribers?and?the?success?of?target?pricing?to?specific?market?segments,?like?college?students,?all?helped?us?to?maintain?momentum.?We?believeour?digital-pay?model?has?great?potentialand?that?is?being?born?out?in?the?acceleration?we're?seeingin?our?year-over-year?subscriber?growth?numbers,?as?well?as?the?related?revenue?growth.

In?our?last?earnings?call,?we?predicted?a?return?to?revenue?growth?for?digital?advertising?in?the?fourth?quarter?and?we?achieved?that.?Indeed,?we?did?somewhat?better?than?we?predicted,?posting?an?11%?year-over-year?digital?advertising?revenue?increase?in?Q4.

Rapid?growth?in?mobile?ad?revenue?was?an?important?factor,?as?well?as?intense?demand?for?the?production?and?distribution?of?branded?content.

Important?also?was?the?November?launch?of?the?New?York?Times?VR?app,?not?to?mention?the?distribution?of?more?than?1?million?Google?Cardboard,?virtual?reality?viewing?devices?to?our?subscribers.

Total?revenues?for?the?quarter?were?flat?at?$445?million?with?strong?digital?performance,offsetting?a?moderate?print?advertising?decline,as?well?as?a?slight?decline?in?print?circulation?revenue.Significant?costs?control?also?accounts?for?the?substantial?increase?in?profitability.

Let?me?now?consider?2015?as?a?whole.In?the?fall,?we?published?our?path?forward,?a?short?statement?of?our?strategic?ambitions?for?the?coming?years.Central?to?those?ambitions?is?our?determination?to?double?our?pure-play?digital?revenue?over?the?next?five?years.And?it?was?very?encouraging?to?see?tangible?steps?towards?that?target?in?2015.?During?the?summer,?we?passed?the?1?million?digital-only?subscriber?mark?and?we?ended?2015?with?1.1?million?digital?subscribers.?We?expect?to?end?2016?with?more?than?a?million?and?a?quarter?digital-only?subscribers.

The?digital?advertising?market?is?undergoing?profound?change?and?we're?not?immune?to?its?volatility,?but?we?believe?that?our?strategic?approach?to?rapidly?build?out?new?high-value?propositions?for?marketers?in?branded?content,?mobile,?video?and?VR?is?paying?off,?with?strong?growth?in?three?out?of?four?quarters.?We?will?continue?to?invest?in?advanced?storing?technology?and?talent?in?mobile?ad?innovation?and?in?a?broad?range?of?services?to?help?advertisers?reach?their?target?audiences?on?our?own?assets?and?also?across?other?platforms.

T?Brand?Studiois?a?particular?success?story?with?no?fewer?than?120?campaigns?launched?for?70?advertisers?since?we?started?the?business?in?January?2014,?just?two?years?ago.?We?don't?expect?digital?advertising?revenue?growth?associated?with?these?new?growth?areas?to?be?even?across?the?year.?But?we?are?confident?that?we?have?the?talent?and?the?drivers?in?place?to?make?2016?a?year?of?strong?digital?advertising?growth.

Print?advertising?continues?to?vary?unexpectedly?month-to-month,?but?the?significant?pause?we?saw?in?the?first?half?of?the?year?moderated?somewhat?in?the?second?half.?As?you?will?hear,?so?far?at?least,?that?more?moderate?picture?is?extending?into?early?2016.

Print?circulation?revenue?followed?a?more?predictable?pattern?with?home?delivery?price?increases?compensating?for?most,?but?not?quite?all?of?the?volume?declines?both?in?home?delivery?and?single-copy?sales.?Adjusted?operating?profit?for?the?year?was?up?to?$289?million,?compared?to?$256?million?for?2014?due?to?lower?costs?and?strong?digital?revenue?growth.

I?might?add?that?2015?was?a?very?strong?year?for?Times'?journalism?with?exceptional?work?in?international?news,?where?our?continued?investment?in?global?news?gathering?enabled?us?to?cover?stories?like?the?refugee?crisis?and?the?Paris?attacks?with?more?depth?and?focus?than?any?other?news?provider,?as?well?as?investigations?and?features.

I?think?it's?also?worth?noting?the?exceptional?and?innovative?coverage?of?Tuesday's?Iowa?caucuses.?We?saw?traffic?totals?in?the?top?1%?of?all?traffic?days?in?the?history?of?The?New?York?Times?and?very?high?levels?of?engagement,?including?the?highest?number?of?readers?we've?ever?had?on?a?live?blog?during?the?24-hour?period.?The?presentation?of?the?story?on?smartphone?complete?with?animating?infographics?broke?new?ground.

So,?what?are?our?plans?for?2016?Our?path?forward?calls?for?us?to?reach?out?to?new?audiences?at?home?and?abroad,?to?substantially?grow?the?number?of?the?most?engaged?users,?to?further?grow?both?our?digital?circulation?and?advertising?businesses,?to?develop?our?mobile?video?and?branded?content?businesses,?and?to?exploit?other?B2B?and?B2C?opportunities.

Over?the?course?of?2016,?therefore,?we?expect?to?invest?judiciously?in?growth,?to?develop?content?for?targeted?international?audiences?and?to?market?the?Times?more?effectively?to?them,to?grow?our?multimedia?capabilities?in?video,?VR?and?audio,?to?further?build?out?T?Brand?Studio,and?to?extend?the?package?of?services?we?offer?our?advertising?partners,?as?well?as?other?initiatives.

But?one?of?our?achievements?in?recent?years?has?been?to?combine?investment?in?digital?growth?with?a?tight?grip?on?costs,?and?we're?still?determined?to?focus?on?both.Over?the?coming?months,?we?will?take?a?close?look?at?our?existing?cost?base,even?as?we?make?targeted?investments?in?our?digital?future.?We?know?that?success?was?dependent?on?the?quality?of?journalism?we?offer?our?users?here?and?around?the?world,?and?we?must?maintain?that?quality.

Nonetheless,?we?believe?that?alongside?investment?in?our?newsroom?and?elsewhere,?there?is?scope?for?further?structural?savings?across?our?cost?base.

Deep?into?its?digital?transition,?The?New?York?Times?Company,?unlike?many?of?its?rivals,?remains?a?very?profitable?companyand?we're?determined?to?grow?that?profitability?just?as?we?did?in?2015.?Although?in?2016?we?expect?our?investment?in?digital?will?put?downward?pressure?on?operating?profit,?we?are?committed?to?returning?to?operating?profit?growth?as?soon?as?we?can.

In?summary,?I?see?2016?as?an?investment?year,?building?on?our?strategy?and?some?of?the?key?successes?of?2015.?I?see?it?as?a?year?of?continued?transformation?of?the?business?to?meet?the?changing?needs?of?our?customers?and?a?changing?market.?And?I?see?it?as?a?year?in?which?we?take?the?necessary?steps?both?to?double?our?digital?revenue?over?the?next?five?years?and?to?grow?the?company's?profitability?in?the?long-term.

But?now,?let?me?hand?over?to?Jim.

James?M.?Follo?-?Chief?Financial?Officer?&?Executive?Vice?President

Thank?you,?Mark,?and?good?morning,?everyone.?As?Mark?said,?we?closed?2015?with?a?solid?fourth?quarter,?highlighted?by?strong?growth?in?profitability,?driven?by?solid?digital?consumer?and?advertising?performance?and?good?cost?control.

Adjusted?operating?profit?rose?13%?in?the?quarter,?to?$118?million?and?adjusted?diluted?earnings?per?share?was?$0.37?in?the?fourth?quarter,?compared?to?$0.26?in?the?prior?year.?We?reported?GAAP?operating?profit?of?approximately?$88?million,?compared?to?$62?million?in?the?same?period?of?2014.

Overall,revenues?were?flat?in?the?quarter?with?strong?digital?revenue?growth?offset?by?weakness?in?print?revenues.For?the?full?year,?adjusted?operating?profit?also?grew?13%?to?$289?million,?while?operating?profit?grew?49%?to?$137?million,?on?revenues?that?were?down?less?than?1%,?or?$9?million.

Circulation?revenues?increased?approximately?1%in?the?quarter?with?digital-only?subscription?revenue?growth?more?than?offsetting?print?declines.Digital-only?subscription?revenues?wereapproximately?$50?million?in?the?quarter,an?increase?of?13%?from?the?same?quarter?in?2014.

On?the?print?circulation?side,?we?benefited?fromJanuary?2015's?home?delivery?price?increase,although?higher?revenue?associated?with?the?new?rates?was?outweighed?by?overall?print?volume?declines.?The?print?decline?was?driven?by?lower?single-copy?revenues.

We?again?implemented?a?home?delivery?price?increase?at?the?beginning?of?the?first?quarter?of?2016?at?a?rate?similar?to?recent?annual?price?increases.

Advertising?revenues?were?down?1%?in?the?quarter?with?digital?revenue?growing?11%?and?print?advertising?declining?7%.

The?digital?advertising?performance?was?particularly?encouraging,?given?the?tough?year-over year?comparisons,?where?digital?advertising?grew?19%?in?the?fourth?quarter?of?2014.

Digital?advertising?reflected?strong?growth?in?mobile,?branded?content?and?creative?services?revenue.

Revenues?from?our?initial?slate?of?VR?films?in?the?quarter?also?contributed?to?growth.

Mobile?revenues?continued?to?grow?at?a?rapid?rate?versus?2014,?up?72%?in?Q4?and?58%?for?the?full-year?and?represented?approximately?22%?of?total?digital?advertising?revenues?in?the?quarter.

The?lower?print?advertising?revenue?was?due?to?declines?in?the?New?York?Times?and?more?significant?declines?in?the?International?New?York?Times.

In?the?New?York?Times,?luxury,?media,?travel,?real?estate,?and?home?furnishing?categories?all?performed?well?in?the?quarter.?While?entertainment,?financial,?technology,?and?telecom?advertising?were?weak.?The?decline?in?the?International?New?York?Times?was?mainly?driven?by?a?decline?in?the?luxury?category,?and?foreign?currency?exchange?rates?also?played?a?part?in?that?decline.

As?usual,?we?experienced?significant?month-to-month?volatility?in?advertising?revenues.Our?quarterly?performance?strengthened?as?the?quarter?progressed?as?illustrated?by?the?fact?that?overall?advertising?wasdown?9%?in?October,?flat?in?November?and?up?7%?in?December.

And?finally?on?the?revenue?side,?our?revenues?are?flat?in?the?quarter.?That?category?includes?NYT?Live,?which?is?our?live?events?business,?our?Crossword?product,?building?rental?income,?digital?archives?and?others.Digital?archives?and?building?rental?income?grew?in?the?quarter?but?were?offset?by?declines?in?NYT?Live?and?our?retail?store.?The?decline?in?NYT?Live?was?in?part?due?to?the?postponement?of?our?luxury?conference?in?Paris.

Operating?costs?decreased?again?in?the?fourth?quarter?by?nearly?$30?million?overall,

while?adjusted?operating?costs?declined?$14?million,?or?4%.?Operating?costs?decline?in?the?quartermainly?due?to?print?production?and?distribution?efficiencies,?declines?in?severance,?depreciation,?amortization?and?raw?material?costs,as?well?as?lower?marketing?and?promotion,benefits?and?non-operating?retirement?costs.

Our?focus?on?reducing?legacy?cost?remains?a?top?priority,?while?at?the?same?time?we'll?continue?to?invest?in?growing?our?digital?revenues.

Our?non-operating?retirement?costs?were?down?in?the?quarter?to?$7.5?million?from?$11.2?million?in?the?prior?year?due?to?both?lower?pension?interest?expense?and?retiree?medical?costs.

Moving?to?the?balance?sheet,?our?cash?and?marketable?securities?balances?was?$905?million,?and?our?total?cash?position?exceeds?debt?and?capital?lease?obligations?by?approximately?$473?million.?While?our?qualified?pension?obligations?declined?at?year?end,?due?to?a?rise?in?discount?rates?from?prior?year,?plan?asset?performance?trailed?our?expectations.?Thus?our?unfunded?qualified?pension?obligations?ended?the?year?roughly?flat?with?the?prior?year?at?$273?million.

The?company?has?repurchased?approximately?$6.5?million?Class?A?shares?for?$83?million?to?date?as?of?February?2,?under?our?previously?announced?$101?million?share?repurchase?authorization.

And?let?me?conclude?with?our?outlook?for?the?first?quarter?of?2016.

Circulation?revenues?are?expected?to?increase?at?a?rate?similar?to?the?fourth?quarter?trend,?driven?by?the?benefit?of?our?digital?subscription?revenue?growth,?partially?offset?by?lower?print?circulation?revenues.

Despite?the?impact?of?the?home?delivery?price?increase.?We?expect?the?total?number?of?net?digital?subscription?additions?to?be?about?50,000?in?the?first?quarter.

Overall,advertising?revenues?are?expected?to?be?down?between?2%?and?4%?with?digital?advertising?revenue?growing?in?the?mid-single?digits.?Other?revenues?are?expected?to?increase?approximately?10%,?and

first?quarter?operating?costs?and?adjusted?operating?costs?are?expected?to?increase?in?the?low-single?digits.Due?primarily?to?a?change?we're?making?in?calculating?interest?costs?on?our?legacy?pension?obligations.?We?expect?non-operating?retirement?costs?to?decline?by?about?$4?million?in?the?first?quarter?to?$5?million.

And?as?Mark?stated?in?his?remarks,?as?we?look?out?for?the?full?year,we?expect?adjusted?operating?costs?will?increase?in?the?low?to?mid-single?digits,?as?we?invest?in?certain?areas?of?the?business?that?we?believe?we?can?grow?over?time.?We'll?continue?to?maintain?the?strong?cost?discipline?that?we've?exhibited?in?the?past,?but?are?willing?to?invest?in?areas?of?growth.

And?with?that,?we'd?like?to?open?it?up?for?questions.

Question-and-Answer?Session

Operator

Your?first?question?is?from?William?Bird?from?FBR?Capital?Markets.

William?Bird?-?FBR?Capital?Markets?&?Co.

Good?morning.?Mark,?I?was?wondering?if?you?could?talk?a?bit?aboutwhere?you're?focusing?your?digital?investments?in?2016.And?maybe,?if?you?could?talk?specifically?about?what?you're?doing?in?the?areas?of?digital?video?and?marketer?insights??Thank?you.

Mark?J.?T.?Thompson?-?President,?Chief?Executive?Officer?&?Director

Good?morning,?Bill.?I?don't?want?to?add?much?to?what?I?said?in?my?remarks,?really.?But?I?expect?investment?both?in?as?it?were?conventional?video.?We?have?a?great?new?leader?of?our?video?efforts?in?Alex?MacCallum?at?the?Times.?And?I?expect?to?invest?more?in?conventional?video.We?also?want?to?back?up?the?success?we?had?in?Q4?2015?with?the?launch?of?VR?app?and?the?delivery?of?more?than?a?million?Google?Cardboard?viewersto?our?subscribers?with?more?investment?in?VR?capability.

And?on?the?marketer?side,?I?might?just?hand?over?briefly?to?Meredith,?but?we?believe?we've?got?a?really?rapidly?growing?business?in?T?Brand?Studio,?and?we?think?that?the?range?of?services?that?we?can?offer,?as?you?know,?we're?–?in?T?Brand?Studio?we're?making?content?for?advertising?partners.?We?think?the?range?of?services?we?can?offer?those?partners?could?be?broader?than?it?currently?is?and?we'll?be?investing?in?that.?But,?Meredith,?do?you?want?to?talk?about...

Meredith?Kopit?Levien?-?Executive?Vice?President,?Chief?Revenue?Officer

Sure.

Mark?J.?T.?Thompson?-?President,?Chief?Executive?Officer?&?Director

...about?the?marketer?side.

Meredith?Kopit?Levien?-?Executive?Vice?President,?Chief?Revenue?Officer

Sure.?Good?morning.?I?think?Mark?actually?just?headlined?it?very?well.?I'll?say?we?had?a?very?good?year?inT?Brand?Studio,?and?we're?doing?very?well?in?helping?marketers?develop?the?right?creative.?We're?also?seeing?quite?a?bit?of?demand?for?distribution?of?that?creative,?and?we're?building?out?our?portfolio?services?to?be?able?to?help?them?do?that.

We're?building?out?our?sort?of?capability?and?expertise?at?making?the?branded?content?at?the?point?of?discovery?richer?and?more?compelling,?and?I?would?say?we're?going?to?keep?investing?in?people?and?technology?capabilities?around?sort?of?advanced?storytelling?formats.?So,?VR?is?one?of?them,?but?there?are?many?others.

William?Bird?-?FBR?Capital?Markets?&?Co.

And?separately,?could?you?talk?about?your?current?perspective?on?your?plans?for?utilizing?your?growing?cash?balance??Thank?you.

Mark?J.?T.?Thompson?-?President,?Chief?Executive?Officer?&?Director

Jim,?do?you?want?to?tackle?that?

James?M.?Follo?-?Chief?Financial?Officer?&?Executive?Vice?President

Yeah.?I?will.?Bill,?we're?still?executing?under?our?share?authorization?program.?And?as?I've?said,?we're?probably?a?little?bit?more?than?$80?million?into?that.?So,?we'll?continue?to?evaluate?that?but?we?did?say,?when?we?put?that?in?place,?we?said?that?was?kind?of?a?one-off?issue,?where?we?would?be?essentially?offsetting?the?dilution?from?a?warrant?exercised?earlier?partly,?but?we'll?continue?to?explore?that.?We'll?continue?to?be?mindful?of?our?pension?obligations?as?well,?and?I?hope?to?give?you?an?update?on?that?as?well,?those?issues?we?hope?to?take?care?of?themselves,?through?interest?rate.?That?doesn't?really?happening?at?least?in?the?short?term.?We?feel?reasonably?good?about?where?we?are?from?a?dividend?point?of?view?and?the?amount?of?cash?that?we?generate?annually?being?paid?out?in?a?form?of?dividend.

So,?we'll?continue?to?watch?it,?but?right?now?we?feel?like?the?balance?sheet?is?a?good?place.?It?gives?us?a?lot?of?flexibility?to?be?able?to?invest?where?we?need?to.?But?that?will?change?over?time.?Obviously,?pension?obligations,?we?hope?will?settle?themselves?and?that?might?free?up?some?of?our?thinking?there.?But?right?now,?we?feel?pretty?good?where?we?sit?from?the?balance?sheet?point?of?view.

William?Bird?-?FBR?Capital?Markets?&?Co.

Thank?you.

Operator

Your?next?question?is?from?Alexia?Quadrani?from?JPMorgan.

Alexia?S.?Quadrani?-?JPMorgan?Securities?LLC

Thank?you.?If?I?could?just?dig?in?a?little?bit?further?on?the?advertising?trends,?I?know?it's?always?very?volatile?and?we?shouldn't?maybe?read?too?much?into?it,?but?it?does?look?like?trends?have?been?better?both?in?print?and?in?digital?in?the?recent?quarters.?I?guess?are?there?any?changes?that?you're?seeing?ahead??I?mean,could?we?be?bumping?up?close?to?the?bottom?maybe?on?the?print?side?

And?on?the?digital?side,?I?know?you?had?a?lot?of?internal?changes,?which?clearly?are?having?some?positive?results?there.?Can?those?be?–?can?we?see?incremental?growth,?I?guess,?still?coming?from?those?changes?ahead?on?the?digital?side?

Meredith?Kopit?Levien?-?Executive?Vice?President,?Chief?Revenue?Officer

Yeah.?I?mean.?I?think?–?good?morning,?Alexia.?I?think?a?lot?of?what?we?think?is?embedded?at?least?for?the?next?quarter?and?the?guidance?that?Jim?shared.?But,?I'll?say?two?things.

One?is?I?think?–?we?all?think?thatthe?character?of?the?ad?business?is?fundamentally?changing.It?used?to?be?a?business?that?was?highly,?highly?dependent?on?display?and?not?changing.?And?that's?making?for?what?feels?like?more?volatility?or?less?certainties?for?month-to-month.?But?the?business?now?is?much?more?about?branded?content?and?content?services?in?mobile?and?video?and?sort?of?what?I?just?refer?to?as?kind?of?advanced?storytelling.?And?as?a?result,?I?think?that?means?bigger,?more?complex?partnerships?with?marketers?and?often?take?a?while?to?get?up?and?off?the?ground.

So,?all?a?way?of?saying?we?have?a?fair?amount?of?optimism?about?our?continued?growth?in?the?areas?that?we've?been?saying,?we?have?been?growing,?which?are?video,?branded?content,?mobile?and?services?around?branded?content.

Mark?J.?T.?Thompson?-?President,?Chief?Executive?Officer?&?Director

And?if?I?can?just?say?in?particular?one?news?I'm?excited?about?is?the?work?we're?doing?in?mobile.?I?think?the?way?we're?deploying?our?journalism?on?smartphone,?the?stronger?visual?impact?of?what?we're?doing,?the?launch?of?new?ad?units?in?mobile,?some?of?the?numbers?we're?seeing?around?engagement?on?mobile?and?the?straightforward?dramatic?growth?of?mobile?as?a?percentage?of?our?digital?advertising,?all?feels?very?encouraging.?And?that?business?of?–?can?you?begin?to?really?drive?revenue?from?mobile?alongside?the?levels?of?consumption?from?mobile,?I?think?we?made?–?I?would?say?dramatic?gains?across?2015.?And?I?think?we?look?set?fair?for?2016?in?mobile?as?well.

Alexia?S.?Quadrani?-?JPMorgan?Securities?LLC

Okay.?Thank?you.?And?just?one?quick?follow-up,?if?I?may.?I?apologize?if?I?missed?this.?But?the?impressive?growth?in?the?digital?pay?subs?we?saw?in?the?quarter,?was?there?anything?unique?in?the?composition?of?those?new?subscribers?in?terms?of?what?type?of?subscribers?they?were?

Meredith?Kopit?Levien?-?Executive?Vice?President,?Chief?Revenue?Officer

I?think?we're?continuing?to?see?success?where?you've?sort?of?heard?us?talk?about?it?all?year.?So,?education,?individual?subscription,?International?–?International?is?actually?growing?at?a?pretty?fast?clip?–?and?also?B2B.?So,both?education?B2B?and?corporate?subscriptions.

We're?seeing?growth?in?all?of?those?areas?and?we?expect?those?to?be?the?areas?of?growth?for?next?year.?I'll?also?say,?I?think,?we're?retaining?better.?So?some?of?the?new?tactics?we've?deployed?around?retention?are?really?starting?to?take?root?and?you'll?see?that?play?out?across?the?next?few?quarters.

Alexia?S.?Quadrani?-?JPMorgan?Securities?LLC

Thank?you?very?much.

Operator

Your?next?question?is?from?Craig?Huber?from?Huber?Research?Partners.

Craig?Anthony?Huber?-?Huber?Research?Partners?LLC

Yes,?hi.?Thank?you.?I?got?a?few?housekeeping?questions?first,?if?I?could.?Pension,?what?is?your?outlook?here?for?potential?contributions?to?the?pension?this?new?year?

James?M.?Follo?-?Chief?Financial?Officer?&?Executive?Vice?President

Craig,?we?are?well?ahead?of?required?funding,?government-mandated?funding?for?many?years?–?not?many?years,?I?should?say,?several?years.?So?I?think?we?still?hold?that?interest?rates?–?we'll?hold?out?to?see?where?interest?rates?go?over?time.?So?we?don't?see?any?real?immediate?need?to?be?more?aggressive?on?funding.

There?are?some?required?smaller?contributions?that?are?a?result?of?some?contractual?obligations.?Those?are?relatively?small.?And?so?our?outlook?for?the?year?should?be?relatively?small,?but?no?discretionary?contributions,?that's?our?current?posture.

Craig?Anthony?Huber?-?Huber?Research?Partners?LLC

Okay.?Then?also,?I?want?to?ask?you?for?a?daily?and?Sunday?circulation?print?volume,?what?were?those?percentages?changes?in?the?quarter?year-over-year,?please?

Meredith?Kopit?Levien?-?Executive?Vice?President,?Chief?Revenue?Officer

Q4?daily?down?6.9%,?and?Sunday,?4.4%.

Craig?Anthony?Huber?-?Huber?Research?Partners?LLC

Okay.?Thank?you?for?that.?Then?also,?newsprint,新聞?dòng)眉圛'm?curious?what?the?average?percent?change?there?was?for?price?and?also?consumption,?please,?in?the?quarter?

James?M.?Follo?-?Chief?Financial?Officer?&?Executive?Vice?President

I?think?the?total?rawmaterial?number,?I?think,?in?Q4?was?down?about?4?million.?I?think?three?quarters?of?that?was?price?and?one?quarter?was?volume?related.?I?will?say?that?newsprint?price?has?been?kind?of?declining?really?all?throughout?2015.?We?think?that?bottom?has?been?hit?and?some?early?signs?of?prices?potentially?rising?next?year.?There's?been?some?small?unannounced?price?increases.?We'll?see?where?that?goes.?But?I?think?that?the?idea?that?the?prices?might?continue?to?climb,?we?don't?think?is?likely?to?happen.

Craig?Anthony?Huber?-?Huber?Research?Partners?LLC

Also?I?just?want?to?finish?up?here?with?some?–?a?couple?questions?on?costs.?In?the?fourth?quarter,?it?seemed?like?your?costs?were?meaningfully?better?than?you?guys?were?looking?for.?I?wonder?what?that?change?was?as?the?quarter?played?out??And?also,?for?this?new?year,?I?make?it?cost?adjustment?up?(26:10),?I?guess,?low?to?mid-single?digits.?If?you?take?out?the?digital?investments?there,?what?would?that?be,?please?

James?M.?Follo?-?Chief?Financial?Officer?&?Executive?Vice?President

Well,?we?haven't?given?–?we're?not?going?to?get?to?that?level?of?granularity.?The?one?thing?I?would?say?is?we?continue?to?both?in?–?all?throughout?2015?and?then?into?2016,?we?continue?to?take?out?costs?out?of?legacy?business.

That?will?continue.I?said?–?I?mentioned?that?newsprint?price?alone?was?a?pretty?big?help?in?2015.

It?will?be?a?help?in?2016?because?we're?still?beginning?–?in?the?early?part?of?the?year,?we're?still?be?comping?against?some?lower?prices,?but?prices?that?are?likely?to?be?higher?as?we?enter?the?back?half?of?the?year.

So,?I?think?–?so,?I'm?going?to?break?that?out,?but?I?will?say?that?there?was?a?similar?trend?that?occurred?this?year?too?which?is?pretty?strong?control?on?the?legacy?side,?pretty?good?investment?on?kind?of?theadvertising?technology?marketing?side.?We?think?those?likely?continue,?but?I?don't?want?to?be?more?precise?than?that.

Craig?Anthony?Huber?-?Huber?Research?Partners?LLC

Okay.

Mark?J.?T.?Thompson?-?President,?Chief?Executive?Officer?&?Director

Only?thing?we?might?add?is?that?2016?sees?a?couple?of?exceptional?news?events,?the?Olympic?Games,?the?Presidential?election,?which?have?got,?as?we're?one?off?one,?costs?that?recur?once?every?four?years,?but?not?every?year.

Craig?Anthony?Huber?-?Huber?Research?Partners?LLC

Great.?Thank?you.

Operator

Your?next?question?is?from?John?Janedis?from?Jefferies.

John?Janedis?-?Jefferies?LLC

Thank?you.?Good?morning.?Maybe?this?one's?for?Meredith?or?Mark.?But?you've?highlighted?timing?in?comps?and?the?digital?advertising?segment?and?expanded?the?offerings?to?advertisers.?I?was?wondering,?given?the?reported?mobile?growth?from?the?larger?pure-play?companies,?there?is?that?narrative?thatbudgets?are?further?shifting?from?print?to?mobile.I?was?hoping?you?could?comment?on?that,?given?your?unique?position?as?a?national?leader?in?print,?and?then?also?with?a?large?digital?and?growing?mobile?business.

Meredith?Kopit?Levien?-?Executive?Vice?President,?Chief?Revenue?Officer

Hi?there.?I?will?say?I?think?Mark?talked?about?the?level?to?which?mobile?grew?as?a?percentage?of?advertising.?So,?I?think,?in?the?fourth?quarter,?it?was?22%?of?our?advertising?and?most?of?that?growth?is?on?the?smartphone?specifically.?So,?we're?very?optimistic?about?that?continuing.

What?I'll?say?is?we're?learning?quite?a?bit?from?what's?going?well?in?mobile?on?the?direct?sales?side?with?our?Mobile?Moments?product?and?our?Flex?Frame?ad?product,?and?we're?going?to?translate?a?fair?amount?of?that?back?into?Web?display.?So,?I?think?we?have?some?–?while?that?business?is?sort?of?broadly?softening.

I?think?we?have?some?optimism?around?the?future?there.?We?treat?it?more?like?mobile.?And?I?think?Jim?talked?about?print?and?our?thoughts?on?sort?of?print?are?already?embedded?in?the?guidance.?But?there?are?plenty?of?categories?that?remain?quite?strong?in?print,?luxury?being?the?biggest?one?for?us.?And?we?still?have?a?fair?amount?of?optimism?there.

Mark?J.?T.?Thompson?-?President,?Chief?Executive?Officer?&?Director

And?some?of?the?transition?is?from?desktop?digital?to?mobile?rather?than?from?print?to?mobile.

Meredith?Kopit?Levien?-?Executive?Vice?President,?Chief?Revenue?Officer

Yeah.

Mark?J.?T.?Thompson?-?President,?Chief?Executive?Officer?&?Director

That's?the?other?thing.

John?Janedis?-?Jefferies?LLC

Yes.?So?you?think?the?majority?then?comes?from?display?

Meredith?Kopit?Levien?-?Executive?Vice?President,?Chief?Revenue?Officer

Say?that?again.

John?Janedis?-?Jefferies?LLC

I'm?sorry.?Do?you?think?the?majority?then?of?that?growth?is?coming?–?meaning?a?shift?from?display?or?particularly,?where?is?that?budget?coming?from?

Meredith?Kopit?Levien?-?Executive?Vice?President,?Chief?Revenue?Officer

Desktop?display?to?smartphone?versus?print?to?smartphone.

John?Janedis?-?Jefferies?LLC

Okay.?Thank?you.?And?then?maybe,?Jim,?just?a?quick?follow-up?in?terms?of?that?investment?in?digital.?I?mean,?I?don't?know?if?you?want?to?give?the?exact?number,?but?is?it?fair?to?say?backing?in?the?numbers?from?Q1?that?you're?looking?maybe?a?low?to?maybe?mid-tens?of?millions?investment?this?year?

James?M.?Follo?-?Chief?Financial?Officer?&?Executive?Vice?President

Well,?low-?to?mid-single?digit?on?our?base,?would?put?you?in?that?–?that's?as?good?as?the?numbers?I?can?give?off?a?base?of?whatever?numbers,?3.3?so?(29:53).

John?Janedis?-?Jefferies?LLC

Yeah.

James?M.?Follo?-?Chief?Financial?Officer?&?Executive?Vice?President

So,?that's?the?guidance?we're?giving.?It's?a?reasonable?range.?I?think?we're?going?to?have?to?be?adaptable?as?we?go?and?we?will.?We'll?leave?ourselves?some?room?to?experiment?and?to?test?a?few?things.?So,?I?don't?want?to?be?as?precise...

John?Janedis?-?Jefferies?LLC

Yeah.

James?M.?Follo?-?Chief?Financial?Officer?&?Executive?Vice?President

...as?the?number?that?I've?given?already.

Mark?J.?T.?Thompson?-?President,?Chief?Executive?Officer?&?Director

I?think,?I?mean,?I?want?to?say?our?posture?on?investment?is?to?experiment?and?back?success?and?feed?money?in?as?we?see?success.?So,?I?believe?we?should?remain?fairly?flexible?about?the?volume?of?investment?through?the?year.

John?Janedis?-?Jefferies?LLC

Thank?you?very?much.

Operator

Your?next?question?is?from?Doug?Arthur?from?Huber?Research?Partners.

Douglas?Middleton?Arthur?-?Huber?Research?Partners?LLC

Yes,?two?questions.?Meredith,?you?broke?out?mobile?as?22%?of?digital.

Can?you?update?us?on?video?as?a?percent?of?total??I?think?in?the?third?quarter,?you?said?less?than?10%?and?native.

And?then?the?second?question?to?Mark,?I?mean,?Mark,?obviously?we've?talked?a?lot?here?on?this?call?about?costs?and?digital?investment.?You?sort?of?implied?in?your?remarks?that?this?2016?is?a?transition?year,?it's?an?investment?year,?and?that?you?would?resume?operating?profit?growth?once?the?investment's?done.?Then?you?also?talked?about?structural?cost?cuts?in?the?legacy?business.?I'm?wondering?if?you?could?just?clarify?your?outlook?on?operating?profit?growth,?generally?speaking,?for?2016.?Thanks.

Meredith?Kopit?Levien?-?Executive?Vice?President,?Chief?Revenue?Officer

Let?me?go?first.?Hi?there.?So,video?is?still?a?fairly?small?percentage?of?our?overall?business?which?I?think?we've?said,small?but?growing.?So,?video?and?VR?were?strong?for?us?in?the?fourth?quarter?again?on?a?small?base,?but?we?do?expect?that?to?grow.

Branded?content?is?becoming?and?was?in?the?fourth?quarter?a?much?more?meaningful?percentage?of?the?business,?and?I'll?say?that?a?fair?amount?of?that?was?also?video?driven,?so?branded?content?programs?that?had?video?production?as?a?meaningful?part?of?what?we?were?doing.

Mark?J.?T.?Thompson?-?President,?Chief?Executive?Officer?&?Director

Okay.?And?if?I?can,?Doug?–?I?mean,?as?I?said?in?my?remarks,?Doug,?we're?committed?to?growing?profitability?over?time.?2016,?I?think,?you?correctly?identified?as?a?transitional?year.?And?as?Jim?said,?we?see?operating?costs?going?up?somewhat,?principally?because?of?investment.?But?we're?committed?to?margin?protection?and?growing?profitability?over?time.?Over?2016,?we're?going?to?look?hard?at?the?cost?base.?We've?had?success?in?recent?years.?And?indeed?in?the?quarter,?we're?talking?about?Q4?2015?in?containing?our?costs.?We?believe?there?is?scope?for?structural?reduction?in?our?costs?base.?We're?going?to?explore?that?plan?out?and?then?implement?it.?And?I'm?not?going?to?give?you?a?precise?timing?on?the?transition,?but?my?expectation?is?certainly?as?we?go?into?2017?that?we?will?be?looking?to?move?to?growth?in?EBITDA?and?growing?profitability?once?again.

Operator

There?are?no?further?questions?at?this?time.?I?will?the?turn?the?call?back?over?to?you,?Harlan?Toplitzky?for?closing?comments.

Harlan?Toplitzky?-?Executive?Director?of?Financial?Planning?&?Analysis

Thank?you?for?joining?us?this?morning.?We?look?forward?to?talking?to?you,?again,?next?quarter.

Operator

This?concludes?today's?conference?call.?You?may?now?disconnect.

最后編輯于
?著作權(quán)歸作者所有,轉(zhuǎn)載或內(nèi)容合作請(qǐng)聯(lián)系作者
  • 序言:七十年代末驮配,一起剝皮案震驚了整個(gè)濱河市,隨后出現(xiàn)的幾起案子,更是在濱河造成了極大的恐慌忌栅,老刑警劉巖垂攘,帶你破解...
    沈念sama閱讀 219,366評(píng)論 6 508
  • 序言:濱河連續(xù)發(fā)生了三起死亡事件,死亡現(xiàn)場(chǎng)離奇詭異阀圾,居然都是意外死亡舍哄,警方通過查閱死者的電腦和手機(jī),發(fā)現(xiàn)死者居然都...
    沈念sama閱讀 93,521評(píng)論 3 395
  • 文/潘曉璐 我一進(jìn)店門普舆,熙熙樓的掌柜王于貴愁眉苦臉地迎上來,“玉大人校读,你說我怎么就攤上這事沼侣。” “怎么了歉秫?”我有些...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 165,689評(píng)論 0 356
  • 文/不壞的土叔 我叫張陵蛾洛,是天一觀的道長(zhǎng)。 經(jīng)常有香客問我雁芙,道長(zhǎng)轧膘,這世上最難降的妖魔是什么? 我笑而不...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 58,925評(píng)論 1 295
  • 正文 為了忘掉前任兔甘,我火速辦了婚禮谎碍,結(jié)果婚禮上,老公的妹妹穿的比我還像新娘洞焙。我一直安慰自己蟆淀,他們只是感情好拯啦,可當(dāng)我...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 67,942評(píng)論 6 392
  • 文/花漫 我一把揭開白布。 她就那樣靜靜地躺著熔任,像睡著了一般褒链。 火紅的嫁衣襯著肌膚如雪。 梳的紋絲不亂的頭發(fā)上疑苔,一...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 51,727評(píng)論 1 305
  • 那天甫匹,我揣著相機(jī)與錄音,去河邊找鬼惦费。 笑死兵迅,一個(gè)胖子當(dāng)著我的面吹牛,可吹牛的內(nèi)容都是我干的趁餐。 我是一名探鬼主播喷兼,決...
    沈念sama閱讀 40,447評(píng)論 3 420
  • 文/蒼蘭香墨 我猛地睜開眼,長(zhǎng)吁一口氣:“原來是場(chǎng)噩夢(mèng)啊……” “哼后雷!你這毒婦竟也來了季惯?” 一聲冷哼從身側(cè)響起,我...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 39,349評(píng)論 0 276
  • 序言:老撾萬榮一對(duì)情侶失蹤臀突,失蹤者是張志新(化名)和其女友劉穎勉抓,沒想到半個(gè)月后,有當(dāng)?shù)厝嗽跇淞掷锇l(fā)現(xiàn)了一具尸體候学,經(jīng)...
    沈念sama閱讀 45,820評(píng)論 1 317
  • 正文 獨(dú)居荒郊野嶺守林人離奇死亡藕筋,尸身上長(zhǎng)有42處帶血的膿包…… 初始之章·張勛 以下內(nèi)容為張勛視角 年9月15日...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 37,990評(píng)論 3 337
  • 正文 我和宋清朗相戀三年,在試婚紗的時(shí)候發(fā)現(xiàn)自己被綠了梳码。 大學(xué)時(shí)的朋友給我發(fā)了我未婚夫和他白月光在一起吃飯的照片隐圾。...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 40,127評(píng)論 1 351
  • 序言:一個(gè)原本活蹦亂跳的男人離奇死亡,死狀恐怖掰茶,靈堂內(nèi)的尸體忽然破棺而出暇藏,到底是詐尸還是另有隱情,我是刑警寧澤濒蒋,帶...
    沈念sama閱讀 35,812評(píng)論 5 346
  • 正文 年R本政府宣布盐碱,位于F島的核電站,受9級(jí)特大地震影響沪伙,放射性物質(zhì)發(fā)生泄漏瓮顽。R本人自食惡果不足惜,卻給世界環(huán)境...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 41,471評(píng)論 3 331
  • 文/蒙蒙 一围橡、第九天 我趴在偏房一處隱蔽的房頂上張望暖混。 院中可真熱鬧,春花似錦翁授、人聲如沸儒恋。這莊子的主人今日做“春日...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 32,017評(píng)論 0 22
  • 文/蒼蘭香墨 我抬頭看了看天上的太陽诫尽。三九已至禀酱,卻和暖如春,著一層夾襖步出監(jiān)牢的瞬間牧嫉,已是汗流浹背剂跟。 一陣腳步聲響...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 33,142評(píng)論 1 272
  • 我被黑心中介騙來泰國(guó)打工, 沒想到剛下飛機(jī)就差點(diǎn)兒被人妖公主榨干…… 1. 我叫王不留酣藻,地道東北人曹洽。 一個(gè)月前我還...
    沈念sama閱讀 48,388評(píng)論 3 373
  • 正文 我出身青樓,卻偏偏與公主長(zhǎng)得像辽剧,于是被迫代替她去往敵國(guó)和親送淆。 傳聞我的和親對(duì)象是個(gè)殘疾皇子,可洞房花燭夜當(dāng)晚...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 45,066評(píng)論 2 355

推薦閱讀更多精彩內(nèi)容