前不久Spring Boot 2.7.0 剛剛發(fā)布统求，Spring Security 也升級到了5.7.1 检碗。升級后發(fā)現(xiàn)据块，原來一直在用的Spring Security配置方法，居然已經(jīng)被棄用了折剃。不禁感慨技術(shù)更新真快另假，用著用著就被棄用了！今天帶大家體驗下Spring Security的最新用法怕犁，看看是不是夠優(yōu)雅边篮！

SpringBoot實(shí)戰(zhàn)電商項目mall（50k+star）地址：github.com/macrozheng/…

基本使用

我們先對比下Spring Security提供的基本功能登錄認(rèn)證，來看看新版用法是不是更好因苹。

升級版本

首先修改項目的pom.xml文件苟耻，把Spring Boot版本升級至2.7.0版本。

<parent>
    <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
    <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-parent</artifactId>
    <version>2.7.0</version>
    <relativePath/> <!-- lookup parent from repository -->
</parent>

舊用法

在Spring Boot 2.7.0 之前的版本中扶檐，我們需要寫個配置類繼承WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter凶杖，然后重寫Adapter中的三個方法進(jìn)行配置；

/**
 * SpringSecurity的配置
 * Created by macro on 2018/4/26.
 */
@Configuration
@EnableWebSecurity
@EnableGlobalMethodSecurity(prePostEnabled = true)
public class OldSecurityConfig extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {
    @Autowired
    private UmsAdminService adminService;

    @Override
    protected void configure(HttpSecurity httpSecurity) throws Exception {
        //省略HttpSecurity的配置
    }

    @Override
    protected void configure(AuthenticationManagerBuilder auth) throws Exception {
        auth.userDetailsService(userDetailsService())
                .passwordEncoder(passwordEncoder());
    }

    @Bean
    @Override
    public AuthenticationManager authenticationManagerBean() throws Exception {
        return super.authenticationManagerBean();
    }

}

如果你在SpringBoot 2.7.0版本中進(jìn)行使用的話款筑，你就會發(fā)現(xiàn)WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter已經(jīng)被棄用了智蝠，看樣子Spring Security要堅決放棄這種用法了！

新用法

新用法非常簡單奈梳，無需再繼承WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter杈湾，只需直接聲明配置類，再配置一個生成SecurityFilterChainBean的方法攘须，把原來的HttpSecurity配置移動到該方法中即可漆撞。

/**
 * SpringSecurity 5.4.x以上新用法配置
 * 為避免循環(huán)依賴，僅用于配置HttpSecurity
 * Created by macro on 2022/5/19.
 */
@Configuration
public class SecurityConfig {

    @Bean
    SecurityFilterChain filterChain(HttpSecurity httpSecurity) throws Exception {
        //省略HttpSecurity的配置
        return httpSecurity.build();
    }

}

新用法感覺非常簡潔干脆于宙，避免了繼承WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter并重寫方法的操作浮驳，強(qiáng)烈建議大家更新一波！

高級使用

升級 Spring Boot 2.7.0版本后捞魁，Spring Security對于配置方法有了大的更改至会，那么其他使用有沒有影響呢？其實(shí)是沒啥影響的谱俭，這里再聊聊如何使用Spring Security實(shí)現(xiàn)動態(tài)權(quán)限控制奉件！

基于方法的動態(tài)權(quán)限

首先來聊聊基于方法的動態(tài)權(quán)限控制，這種方式雖然實(shí)現(xiàn)簡單昆著，但卻有一定的弊端县貌。

• 在配置類上使用@EnableGlobalMethodSecurity來開啟它；

/**
 * SpringSecurity的配置
 * Created by macro on 2018/4/26.
 */
@Configuration
@EnableWebSecurity
@EnableGlobalMethodSecurity(prePostEnabled = true)
public class OldSecurityConfig extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {

}

• 然后在方法中使用@PreAuthorize配置訪問接口需要的權(quán)限凑懂；

/**
 * 商品管理Controller
 * Created by macro on 2018/4/26.
 */
@Controller
@Api(tags = "PmsProductController", description = "商品管理")
@RequestMapping("/product")
public class PmsProductController {
    @Autowired
    private PmsProductService productService;

    @ApiOperation("創(chuàng)建商品")
    @RequestMapping(value = "/create", method = RequestMethod.POST)
    @ResponseBody
    @PreAuthorize("hasAuthority('pms:product:create')")
    public CommonResult create(@RequestBody PmsProductParam productParam, BindingResult bindingResult) {
        int count = productService.create(productParam);
        if (count > 0) {
            return CommonResult.success(count);
        } else {
            return CommonResult.failed();
        }
    }
}

• 再從數(shù)據(jù)庫中查詢出用戶所擁有的權(quán)限值設(shè)置到UserDetails對象中去窃这，這種做法雖然實(shí)現(xiàn)方便，但是把權(quán)限值寫死在了方法上，并不是一種優(yōu)雅的做法杭攻。

/**
 * UmsAdminService實(shí)現(xiàn)類
 * Created by macro on 2018/4/26.
 */
@Service
public class UmsAdminServiceImpl implements UmsAdminService {
    @Override
    public UserDetails loadUserByUsername(String username){
        //獲取用戶信息
        UmsAdmin admin = getAdminByUsername(username);
        if (admin != null) {
            List<UmsPermission> permissionList = getPermissionList(admin.getId());
            return new AdminUserDetails(admin,permissionList);
        }
        throw new UsernameNotFoundException("用戶名或密碼錯誤");
    }
}

基于路徑的動態(tài)權(quán)限

其實(shí)每個接口對應(yīng)的路徑都是唯一的祟敛，通過路徑來進(jìn)行接口的權(quán)限控制才是更優(yōu)雅的方式。

• 首先我們需要創(chuàng)建一個動態(tài)權(quán)限的過濾器兆解，這里注意下doFilter方法馆铁，用于配置放行OPTIONS和白名單請求，它會調(diào)用super.beforeInvocation(fi)方法锅睛，此方法將調(diào)用AccessDecisionManager中的decide方法來進(jìn)行鑒權(quán)操作埠巨；

/**
 * 動態(tài)權(quán)限過濾器，用于實(shí)現(xiàn)基于路徑的動態(tài)權(quán)限過濾
 * Created by macro on 2020/2/7.
 */
public class DynamicSecurityFilter extends AbstractSecurityInterceptor implements Filter {

    @Autowired
    private DynamicSecurityMetadataSource dynamicSecurityMetadataSource;
    @Autowired
    private IgnoreUrlsConfig ignoreUrlsConfig;

    @Autowired
    public void setMyAccessDecisionManager(DynamicAccessDecisionManager dynamicAccessDecisionManager) {
        super.setAccessDecisionManager(dynamicAccessDecisionManager);
    }

    @Override
    public void init(FilterConfig filterConfig) throws ServletException {
    }

    @Override
    public void doFilter(ServletRequest servletRequest, ServletResponse servletResponse, FilterChain filterChain) throws IOException, ServletException {
        HttpServletRequest request = (HttpServletRequest) servletRequest;
        FilterInvocation fi = new FilterInvocation(servletRequest, servletResponse, filterChain);
        //OPTIONS請求直接放行
        if(request.getMethod().equals(HttpMethod.OPTIONS.toString())){
            fi.getChain().doFilter(fi.getRequest(), fi.getResponse());
            return;
        }
        //白名單請求直接放行
        PathMatcher pathMatcher = new AntPathMatcher();
        for (String path : ignoreUrlsConfig.getUrls()) {
            if(pathMatcher.match(path,request.getRequestURI())){
                fi.getChain().doFilter(fi.getRequest(), fi.getResponse());
                return;
            }
        }
        //此處會調(diào)用AccessDecisionManager中的decide方法進(jìn)行鑒權(quán)操作
        InterceptorStatusToken token = super.beforeInvocation(fi);
        try {
            fi.getChain().doFilter(fi.getRequest(), fi.getResponse());
        } finally {
            super.afterInvocation(token, null);
        }
    }

    @Override
    public void destroy() {
    }

    @Override
    public Class<?> getSecureObjectClass() {
        return FilterInvocation.class;
    }

    @Override
    public SecurityMetadataSource obtainSecurityMetadataSource() {
        return dynamicSecurityMetadataSource;
    }

}

• 接下來我們就需要創(chuàng)建一個類來繼承AccessDecisionManager现拒，通過decide方法對訪問接口所需權(quán)限和用戶擁有的權(quán)限進(jìn)行匹配辣垒，匹配則放行；

/**
 * 動態(tài)權(quán)限決策管理器印蔬，用于判斷用戶是否有訪問權(quán)限
 * Created by macro on 2020/2/7.
 */
public class DynamicAccessDecisionManager implements AccessDecisionManager {

    @Override
    public void decide(Authentication authentication, Object object,
                       Collection<ConfigAttribute> configAttributes) throws AccessDeniedException, InsufficientAuthenticationException {
        // 當(dāng)接口未被配置資源時直接放行
        if (CollUtil.isEmpty(configAttributes)) {
            return;
        }
        Iterator<ConfigAttribute> iterator = configAttributes.iterator();
        while (iterator.hasNext()) {
            ConfigAttribute configAttribute = iterator.next();
            //將訪問所需資源或用戶擁有資源進(jìn)行比對
            String needAuthority = configAttribute.getAttribute();
            for (GrantedAuthority grantedAuthority : authentication.getAuthorities()) {
                if (needAuthority.trim().equals(grantedAuthority.getAuthority())) {
                    return;
                }
            }
        }
        throw new AccessDeniedException("抱歉勋桶，您沒有訪問權(quán)限");
    }

    @Override
    public boolean supports(ConfigAttribute configAttribute) {
        return true;
    }

    @Override
    public boolean supports(Class<?> aClass) {
        return true;
    }

}

• 由于上面的decide方法中的configAttributes屬性是從FilterInvocationSecurityMetadataSource的getAttributes方法中獲取的，我們還需創(chuàng)建一個類繼承它侥猬，getAttributes方法可用于獲取訪問當(dāng)前路徑所需權(quán)限值例驹；

/**
 * 動態(tài)權(quán)限數(shù)據(jù)源，用于獲取動態(tài)權(quán)限規(guī)則
 * Created by macro on 2020/2/7.
 */
public class DynamicSecurityMetadataSource implements FilterInvocationSecurityMetadataSource {

    private static Map<String, ConfigAttribute> configAttributeMap = null;
    @Autowired
    private DynamicSecurityService dynamicSecurityService;

    @PostConstruct
    public void loadDataSource() {
        configAttributeMap = dynamicSecurityService.loadDataSource();
    }

    public void clearDataSource() {
        configAttributeMap.clear();
        configAttributeMap = null;
    }

    @Override
    public Collection<ConfigAttribute> getAttributes(Object o) throws IllegalArgumentException {
        if (configAttributeMap == null) this.loadDataSource();
        List<ConfigAttribute>  configAttributes = new ArrayList<>();
        //獲取當(dāng)前訪問的路徑
        String url = ((FilterInvocation) o).getRequestUrl();
        String path = URLUtil.getPath(url);
        PathMatcher pathMatcher = new AntPathMatcher();
        Iterator<String> iterator = configAttributeMap.keySet().iterator();
        //獲取訪問該路徑所需資源
        while (iterator.hasNext()) {
            String pattern = iterator.next();
            if (pathMatcher.match(pattern, path)) {
                configAttributes.add(configAttributeMap.get(pattern));
            }
        }
        // 未設(shè)置操作請求權(quán)限退唠，返回空集合
        return configAttributes;
    }

    @Override
    public Collection<ConfigAttribute> getAllConfigAttributes() {
        return null;
    }

    @Override
    public boolean supports(Class<?> aClass) {
        return true;
    }

}

• 這里需要注意的是鹃锈，所有路徑對應(yīng)的權(quán)限值數(shù)據(jù)來自于自定義的DynamicSecurityService；

/**
 * 動態(tài)權(quán)限相關(guān)業(yè)務(wù)類
 * Created by macro on 2020/2/7.
 */
public interface DynamicSecurityService {
    /**
     * 加載資源ANT通配符和資源對應(yīng)MAP
     */
    Map<String, ConfigAttribute> loadDataSource();
}

• 一切準(zhǔn)備就緒瞧预，把動態(tài)權(quán)限過濾器添加到FilterSecurityInterceptor之前屎债；

/**
 * SpringSecurity 5.4.x以上新用法配置
 * 為避免循環(huán)依賴，僅用于配置HttpSecurity
 * Created by macro on 2022/5/19.
 */
@Configuration
public class SecurityConfig {

    @Autowired
    private DynamicSecurityService dynamicSecurityService;
    @Autowired
    private DynamicSecurityFilter dynamicSecurityFilter;

    @Bean
    SecurityFilterChain filterChain(HttpSecurity httpSecurity) throws Exception {
        //省略若干配置...
        //有動態(tài)權(quán)限配置時添加動態(tài)權(quán)限校驗過濾器
        if(dynamicSecurityService!=null){
            registry.and().addFilterBefore(dynamicSecurityFilter, FilterSecurityInterceptor.class);
        }
        return httpSecurity.build();
    }

}

• 如果你看過這篇僅需四步垢油，整合SpringSecurity+JWT實(shí)現(xiàn)登錄認(rèn)證 扔茅！ 的話，就知道應(yīng)該要配置這兩個Bean了秸苗，一個負(fù)責(zé)獲取登錄用戶信息，另一個負(fù)責(zé)獲取存儲的動態(tài)權(quán)限規(guī)則运褪，為了適應(yīng)Spring Security的新用法惊楼，我們不再繼承SecurityConfig，簡潔了不少秸讹！

/**
 * mall-security模塊相關(guān)配置
 * 自定義配置檀咙，用于配置如何獲取用戶信息及動態(tài)權(quán)限
 * Created by macro on 2022/5/20.
 */
@Configuration
public class MallSecurityConfig {

    @Autowired
    private UmsAdminService adminService;

    @Bean
    public UserDetailsService userDetailsService() {
        //獲取登錄用戶信息
        return username -> {
            AdminUserDetails admin = adminService.getAdminByUsername(username);
            if (admin != null) {
                return admin;
            }
            throw new UsernameNotFoundException("用戶名或密碼錯誤");
        };
    }

    @Bean
    public DynamicSecurityService dynamicSecurityService() {
        return new DynamicSecurityService() {
            @Override
            public Map<String, ConfigAttribute> loadDataSource() {
                Map<String, ConfigAttribute> map = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
                List<UmsResource> resourceList = adminService.getResourceList();
                for (UmsResource resource : resourceList) {
                    map.put(resource.getUrl(), new org.springframework.security.access.SecurityConfig(resource.getId() + ":" + resource.getName()));
                }
                return map;
            }
        };
    }

}

效果測試

• 接下來啟動我們的示例項目mall-tiny-security，使用如下賬號密碼登錄璃诀，該賬號只配置了訪問/brand/listAll的權(quán)限弧可，訪問地址：http://localhost:8088/swagger-ui/

• 然后把返回的token放入到Swagger的認(rèn)證頭中；

• 當(dāng)我們訪問有權(quán)限的接口時可以正常獲取到數(shù)據(jù)劣欢；

• 當(dāng)我們訪問沒有權(quán)限的接口時棕诵，返回沒有訪問權(quán)限的接口提示裁良。

總結(jié)

Spring Security的升級用法確實(shí)夠優(yōu)雅，夠簡單校套，而且對之前用法的兼容性也比較好价脾！個人感覺一個成熟的框架不太會在升級過程中大改用法，即使改了也會對之前的用法做兼容笛匙，所以對于絕大多數(shù)框架來說舊版本會用侨把，新版本照樣會用！