文章系列一 傳送門：http://www.reibang.com/p/d428912147c8
? ? 本文旨在幫助所有被iOS審核失敗困擾的產(chǎn)品狗空扎、程序猿們
? ? ????在收到蘋果客服MM的電話励堡，得知只要我們對(duì)界面做出全量修改就可以再次上架，于是開始了第三輪的全量設(shè)計(jì)圖修改...
????????這次的修改力度可以說是“空前絕后哥牍、慘絕人寰” （手動(dòng)狗頭），歷經(jīng)10天左右的加班開發(fā) 大家再一次信心滿滿的提交了審核厌杜，并附上小作文一篇進(jìn)行產(chǎn)品定位說明低飒、與競品差異化說明、修改范圍說明等芽丹，并表明我們會(huì)完全配合蘋果的各項(xiàng)規(guī)則，我們很乖枉氮。志衍。。
? ? ? ? 這次很快又是12小時(shí)內(nèi)進(jìn)審聊替，1個(gè)半小時(shí)后出了結(jié)果：
Guideline 4.3 - Design
We still noticed that your app provides the same feature set as other apps submitted to the App Store; it simply varies in content or language, which is considered a form of spam.
The next submission of this app may require a longer review time, and this app will not be eligible for an expedited review until this issue is resolved.
Next Steps
- Review the Design section of the App Store Review Guidelines.
- Ensure your app is compliant with all sections of the App Store Review Guidelines and the Terms & Conditions of the Apple Developer Program.
- Once your app is fully compliant, resubmit your app for review.
When creating multiple apps where content is the only varying element, you should offer a single app to deliver differing content to customers. If you would like to offer this content for purchase, it would be appropriate to use the in-app purchase API.
Alternatively, you may consider creating a web app, which looks and behaves similar to a native app when the customer adds it to their Home screen. Refer to the Configuring Web Applications section of the Safari Web Content Guide for more information.
Submitting apps designed to mislead or harm customers or evade the review process may result in the termination of your Apple Developer Program account. Review the Terms & Conditions of the Apple Developer Program to learn more about our policies regarding termination.
? ? ? ? 看到這封郵件后楼肪。。惹悄。猶如晴天霹靂春叫。。泣港。FU*K暂殖！ 全量修改，改的親媽都不認(rèn)識(shí)了当纱，審核人員電話里也說了可以重新上呛每，但。真的是欲哭無淚啊坡氯。晨横。
所以我們分析，凡是進(jìn)入4.3通道的包箫柳，后續(xù)的審核人員會(huì)深度參考前一次被拒的原因手形。想要救回來確實(shí)比較困難（后續(xù)事件證明不僅是4.3，任何被拒條款都會(huì)是后續(xù)審核參考的重要依據(jù)悯恍！所以每次被拒后再提審库糠，一定要進(jìn)行修改的文字說明，方便審核人員快速get到問題已經(jīng)修復(fù)ｄ毯痢）
? ? 冷靜下來后瞬欧，我們又對(duì)整個(gè)審核過程進(jìn)行了復(fù)盤≈习伲總結(jié)出幾個(gè)點(diǎn)：
1黍判、提包賬號(hào)是沒有問題的
2、代碼機(jī)審?fù)ㄟ^3次篙梢，并且蘋果是認(rèn)可的顷帖，電話溝通指出是界面相似
3、單純修改UI是很難救回4.3的
? ? 雖然蘋果很惡心渤滞，但是也不能就此放棄啊贬墩。于是開始了新一輪的頭腦風(fēng)暴。妄呕。陶舞。。绪励。先上個(gè)預(yù)告~~~
