網(wǎng)絡(luò)閱讀和深度閱讀，相輔相成

With the development of social software, people spend more and more time on sharing their daily moments, express their opinions or browse through articles published via Wechat, LinkedIn or Facebook. Does the fragmented reading really benefit people?

隨著社交軟件近年來的興起矾踱，人們越來越多的變成了低頭一族，將時(shí)間花在分享日常生活卢肃，好友留言或者在浩如煙海的微信公眾號(hào)中查看速食小文，問題是這些碎片閱讀是否真的讓公眾收益呢才顿？

Generally, those articles shared on the social networks help people kill the time efficiently. In the past, people got bored easily when they were waiting for the train, queuing at the bank or waiting at the restaurant, but now you do not feel like that because those free subscribed accounts will push articles to you daily from your smart phone Apps, easily filling in your fragmented time.?

就本人拙見莫湘，這些公眾號(hào)的文章確實(shí)有效地幫人們干掉了許多“待機(jī)時(shí)間”，比如娜膘，等待登機(jī)，等待銀行的柜臺(tái)服務(wù)优质，等待餐館的食物準(zhǔn)備就緒的這些瑣碎時(shí)間里竣贪，人們無需茫然而焦灼地被動(dòng)等待军洼，只需刷刷公眾號(hào)，瀏覽幾篇文章即可演怎。

Generally, it is more beneficial for people to spend time reading something rather than staying idle. Some high-quality articles really provide original and specular viewpoints.?

不僅如此匕争，更多的普通人確實(shí)從碎片閱讀中受益了。畢竟爷耀，閱讀一些文字總比閑待著強(qiáng)吧甘桑。何況，公眾號(hào)中不乏有很多原創(chuàng)性強(qiáng)的歹叮，具有獨(dú)到見解的文章呢跑杭。

However, I have to admit that most of those free articles have not in-depth viewpoints. For a person who read wide variety of books, he can easily identify some viewpoints, which are actually copied from books, or magazines but the authors seem not thinking necessary to refer to the sources seriously.?Through binding their own opinions to the public hot events, utilizing inflammatory topics and editing skills, they created articles with the speed of lighting, which are supposed to attract the readers, while the reading amount becomes their real and final “product” to attract advertisers and revenue.

但是，我們也要認(rèn)識(shí)到咆耿，那些免費(fèi)的文章德谅，或者說是文案，并不都有深刻的見解萨螺。如果某人博覽群書窄做，會(huì)很容易發(fā)現(xiàn)這些文案中的觀點(diǎn)似曾相似，也許是引用某本經(jīng)典的著作慰技，或者和某本精心編撰的雜志不謀而合椭盏，而公眾號(hào)的文章很少有嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)?shù)皆谖哪┲赋鰠⒖紩俊＿@些公眾號(hào)充分利用當(dāng)前的社會(huì)熱點(diǎn)新聞吻商，具有煽動(dòng)性的標(biāo)題以及不著痕跡的編輯才能掏颊，速速寫出爆款文案吸引讀者，而閱讀量本身才是它們真正的產(chǎn)品手报，吸引廣告商和滾滾財(cái)源蚯舱。

We might need a more wise way to embed social media reading into our reading plan. Those social media articles are more like a portal to take us into different knowledge fields, but do not just stay at the gate. Try to search for books with in-depth viewpoints in that field to build up your own knowledge framework and form a habit of critical thinking; instead of be misled by the biased opinion of those articles.?

我們不需要因噎廢食，但也許能采用更明智的態(tài)度來制定我們的閱讀計(jì)劃掩蛤。很多公眾號(hào)提供的文章更像一個(gè)窗口枉昏，通過它一窺不同的知識(shí)領(lǐng)域，可是我們能做的不僅僅如此揍鸟。通過閱讀具有深入及系統(tǒng)論據(jù)支持的書籍來構(gòu)建知識(shí)框架兄裂，并且形成批判性的思考習(xí)慣，我們就不會(huì)輕易地因?yàn)楦鞣N公眾號(hào)的觀點(diǎn)而迷失方向阳藻。