Abstract
亞歷山大·貝茨說：“我們都未曾意識到我們社會中的分歧有多大狈惫，英國脫歐顯示了英國社會深層次的對于全球化的恐懼和渴望之間的對立钉迷。我們現(xiàn)在要如何解決對全球化的恐懼，以及伴隨政治建設產(chǎn)生的與日俱增的不安情緒查乒， 同時又不使自身陷入排外主義和民族主義的陰霾中呢印颤？一起聆聽貝茨帶來跨向更包容世界的四部曲馒疹。
Structure
I want to take a step back and ask two very basic questions.
First, what does?Brexit represent, not just for my country, but for all of us around the world?
And second, what can?we do about it?
The fault line of?contemporary politics is between those that embrace globalization and those?that fear globalization.
It was a real shock?to me, and it suggested that people like me who think of ourselves as?inclusive, open and tolerant, perhaps don't know our own countries and?societies nearly as well as we like to believe.
The?glass house of globalization has to be open to all if it is to remain secure.
Bigotry?and ignorance are the ugly face of exclusionary and antagonistic globalization.
Contemporary politics is no longer just about right and left. It's no longer just?about tax and spend. It's about globalization. The fault line of?contemporary politics is between those that embrace globalization and those?that fear globalization.
But for a significant majority of the Leave voters the concern was disillusionment with the political establishment. This was a protest vote for many, a sense that nobody represented them, that they couldn't find a political party that spoke for them, and so they rejected that political establishment. This replicates around Europe and much of the liberal democratic world. We see it with the?rise in popularity of Donald Trump in the United States, with the growing?nationalism of Viktor Orbán in Hungary, with the increase in popularity of?Marine Le Pen in France.
For all of us who care about creating liberal, open, tolerant societies, we urgently need a new vision, a vision of a more?tolerant, inclusive globalization, one that brings people with us rather than?leaving them behind.?
It's been suggested that we've moved to a post-factual society, where evidence and truth no longer matter, and lies have equal?status to the clarity of evidence.
words
elicite
?meltdown
referendum
?xenophobia
?ambivalence
sovereignty
alienation
narrate
?consensus
aggregate
agenda
alienation
?vehemently
prescription
disproportionately
polarization
reconcile
Sentences
1. Hindsight is a?wonderful thing.
2. It highlights in?ways that we seem embarrassingly unaware of how divided our societies are.
3.Or are there deeper?structural factors that have led us to where we are today?
4.they may be unpersuaded by the narrative that we find persuasive in our often liberal bubbles. It?means that we need to reach out more broadly and understand.
5. To take the example of migration, we know that immigration is a net positive for the economy as a whole under almost all circumstances. That doesn't detract?from the fact that it's positive, but it means more people have to share in?those benefits.
