只有窮國，才全民創(chuàng)業(yè)

Only in poor countries do people start businesses

subtitle

狐貍先森幾點鐘 What time does the fox start

2022-02-22 14:53 The 2022-02-22 14:53

關(guān)注 Focus on

01

之前的文章《浙江任性發(fā)錢搶人衙吩，跪求家鄉(xiāng)同款》提到了词身，如果大學(xué)生去浙江打工胞四，我非常支持，畢竟這錢不拿白不拿。

但如果是奔創(chuàng)業(yè)去，我勸你還是冷靜冷靜溢十。

創(chuàng)業(yè)不易，尤其是大學(xué)生达吞，這就跟賭博差不多张弛。

打開網(wǎng)易新聞 查看更多圖片

這倒不是說大學(xué)生應(yīng)該當一輩子打工人，但創(chuàng)業(yè)的失敗率實在太高酪劫，你現(xiàn)在看到的成功企業(yè)家吞鸭，那都是刀山火海闖過來的，可不是隨便成功的覆糟。

搏一搏單車可能變摩托刻剥，但更大概率是只剩車轱轆。

即便失敗資金有人給你兜底滩字，可浪費的青春誰又給你兜底造虏？

還有，你真以為貸款創(chuàng)業(yè)的錢那么輕易地就不用還了踢械？

And do you really think the money you borrowed to start a business is so easy to pay back?

浙江是有錢酗电，但浙江不傻啊。

代償内列，并不意味著債務(wù)消失，只是從欠銀行的錢變成欠政府而已背率，政府是會通過一系列手段拿回來的话瞧，而且還要上征信，上面寫著你有一筆貸款沒還寝姿。

Zhejiang is rich, but zhejiang is not stupid. Repayment, it doesn't mean that the debt disappears, it just goes from the money owed to the bank to the money owed to the government, and the government will get it back through a series of means, but also on the credit bureau, it says that you have a loan not paid.

哪怕這筆錢真收不回來交排，也不要緊。

It doesn't matter if you don't get the money back.

這幾十萬也是被花出去了饵筑，只要在社會流動了埃篓，就會產(chǎn)生數(shù)倍的經(jīng)濟效益，間接增加了稅收根资，政府并不虧架专。

至于有人想法子騙政府的錢同窘，這是想多了。

現(xiàn)在大數(shù)據(jù)系統(tǒng)恐怖得很部脚，任何金錢流動都有痕跡想邦，不然你以為那些主播、明星補稅是怎么來的委刘？

These hundreds of thousands are also spent out, as long as the social flow, it will produce several times the economic benefits, indirectly increase the tax revenue, the government does not lose. As for anyone trying to cheat the government out of its money, that is overthinking. Now the big data system is very scary, any money flow has traces, otherwise you think those anchors, stars pay taxes how to come?

其實丧没，“創(chuàng)業(yè)失敗，政府代償”這個政策锡移，早在2015年就有了呕童。

As a matter of fact, the policy of "government compensation for entrepreneurial failure" was introduced as early as 2015.

政府代償?shù)慕痤~并不多，這是因為淆珊，真正申請通過的人不多夺饲。

The amount of government compensation is not very large, because not many people actually apply.

有本事創(chuàng)業(yè)的人，不缺這幾十萬套蒂，風投資金多得很钞支，就看你有沒有這本事拿。 People who have the ability to start a business, there is no shortage of this hundreds of thousands of venture capital funds, depending on whether you have this ability to take.

缺這幾十萬的操刀，根本沒創(chuàng)業(yè)的能力烁挟，自然申請不到這筆錢。 Lack this hundreds of thousands of, do not have entrepreneurial ability at all, nature applies for less than this money.

02

“大眾創(chuàng)業(yè)骨坑、萬眾創(chuàng)新”撼嗓，相信大家不陌生，出自2014年9月夏季達沃斯論壇上李總理的講話欢唾，李表示且警，要在960萬平方公里土地上掀起“大眾創(chuàng)業(yè)”、“草根創(chuàng)業(yè)”的新浪潮礁遣，形成“萬眾創(chuàng)新”斑芜、“人人創(chuàng)新”的新勢態(tài)。

The phrase "mass entrepreneurship and innovation" is familiar to all of you. At the Summer Davos Forum in September 2014, Premier Li Keqiang said that a new wave of mass entrepreneurship and grassroots entrepreneurship should be launched on the land of 9.6 million square kilometers, and a new trend of mass innovation and innovation for all should be formed.

在我們印象里祟霍，好像一個國家創(chuàng)業(yè)的人越多杏头，經(jīng)濟就越發(fā)達。 It seems to us that the more people start businesses in a country, the more developed its economy will be.

但現(xiàn)實沸呐，可能正好相反醇王。 In reality, the opposite may be true.

窮國之所以窮，是因為缺乏創(chuàng)業(yè)精神嗎崭添？窮人之所以窮寓娩，是因為缺乏創(chuàng)業(yè)機會嗎？

Are poor countries poor because they lack entrepreneurship? Are poor people poor because they lack entrepreneurial opportunities?

給窮人一筆創(chuàng)業(yè)啟動資金，就可以改變他們的命運嗎棘伴？

Can a poor person's life be changed by giving them start-up money?

到底是錢的問題寞埠，還是人的問題，還是社會環(huán)境的問題排嫌？

Is it a problem of money, people or social environment?

如果你要是去過很多地方旅游畸裳，窮國、富國都去過淳地，應(yīng)該能看到怖糊，實際上，更有創(chuàng)業(yè)精神的颇象，恰恰是窮國人而不是富國人伍伤。 If you've been to a lot of places, both rich and poor, you'll see that, in fact, it's poor people who are more entrepreneurial than rich people.

窮國的大街上，遍布各種小商販遣钳、小生意扰魂，叫賣各種稀奇古怪的東西。各種各樣的服務(wù)蕴茴，都有人搶著去干劝评。 The streets of poor countries are full of small traders and businesses selling all kinds of strange things. All kinds of services, people are competing to do.

沒出過國也不要緊，看看國內(nèi)的情況就知道了倦淀，是不是西部地區(qū)特別多小攤小販蒋畜，沿海發(fā)達城市則明顯少很多，這可不是發(fā)達城市的城管比較厲害的原因撞叽。

Did not go out a country also unimportant, see the circumstance of home to know, be western area especially much stall hawker, coastal developed city is much less obviously, this is not the reason that the city management of developed city is more fierce.

柬埔寨小男孩為了賣紀念品姻成，學(xué)會15種語言，你說窮人不努力愿棋？

Cambodian boy learns 15 languages to sell souvenirs. Poor people don't work hard?

而富國呢科展？那就簡單乏味得多了。在富國糠雨，大多數(shù)人都是上班族才睹，老老實實地給老板打工。創(chuàng)業(yè)這事甘邀，困難砂竖、辛苦、且風險巨大鹃答，大多數(shù)人不愿意受這個累。 What about rich countries? That would be much more simple and boring. In rich countries, most people are salarymen, working honestly for their bosses. Starting a business is difficult, laborious, and risky, and most people don't want to suffer from it.

踏踏實實地按月領(lǐng)工資突硝，不好嗎测摔？這就是富國的現(xiàn)實。 Get your salary by the month, isn't it? This is the reality of the rich world.

實證數(shù)據(jù)也證明了這一點。在窮國锋八，很多人都是農(nóng)民浙于，農(nóng)民本身就是小經(jīng)營者，需要獨自打理從生產(chǎn)到運輸?shù)絻Υ娴戒N售的全部環(huán)節(jié)挟纱。所以一個農(nóng)民實際上就是個小企業(yè)家羞酗。

This is also borne out by empirical data. In poor countries, many people are farmers, and farmers themselves are small operators who have to handle everything from production to transport to storage to sales. So a farmer is actually a small entrepreneur.

即使不把農(nóng)民算在內(nèi)，只計算非農(nóng)業(yè)勞動人口紊服，在大多數(shù)發(fā)展中國家檀轨，30%-50%的人屬于個體勞動者，也就是創(chuàng)業(yè)者欺嗤。

Even if you do not count farmers but only non-agricultural workers, in most developing countries 30-50% of the population is self-employed, that is, entrepreneurs.

而且参萄，越窮，這個比例越高煎饼。加納是67%讹挎，孟加拉是75%，貝寧甚至高達88%吆玖。 And the poorer they are, the higher the percentage. It is 67% in Ghana, 75% in Bangladesh and 88% in Benin.

一個將近9成人都創(chuàng)業(yè)的國家筒溃，總不能說還缺乏創(chuàng)業(yè)精神吧。 In a country where nearly 90 percent of people start businesses, it is hard to say that there is a lack of entrepreneurial spirit.

像柬埔寨這樣的窮國沾乘，景區(qū)都會遍布賣紀念品的小孩怜奖，真正是全民創(chuàng)業(yè)啊

In a poor country like Cambodia, the scenic spots are full of kids selling souvenirs. It's really a national enterprise

再看發(fā)達國家的數(shù)據(jù)。美國人據(jù)說很愛創(chuàng)業(yè)意鲸，但美國的非農(nóng)業(yè)勞動人口中烦周，個體經(jīng)營者只有7.5%，法國是8.6%怎顾，挪威最低读慎，只有6.7%；發(fā)達國家這個比例平均是12.8%槐雾。

Look at the figures for the developed world. Americans are said to be entrepreneurial, but only 7.5 percent of the non-farm labor force in the United States is self-employed, compared with 8.6 percent in France and 6.7 percent in Norway. The average in developed countries is 12.8%.

美國人的創(chuàng)業(yè)精神在發(fā)達國家中低于平均值夭委。看來募强，美國人并不是那么愛創(chuàng)業(yè)株灸，他們更愛找個公司去上班。 American entrepreneurship is below average in the developed world. Americans, it seems, are not so entrepreneurial. They prefer to find a company to work for.

也就是說擎值，一個人如果降生在窮國慌烧，他成為自謀生路的創(chuàng)業(yè)者的機會，比生在富國其實要大得多鸠儿。

In other words, a person born in a poor country has a much better chance of becoming a self-employed entrepreneur than one born in a rich country.

但是結(jié)果是什么呢屹蚊？不管他們多么有創(chuàng)業(yè)精神厕氨，不畏艱難險阻的奮勇拼搏，換來的卻只是貧困汹粤。

But what are the results? No matter how entrepreneurial they are, they struggle through thick and thin, only to find poverty.

你永遠不知道命斧，窮國的家庭為了生活有多努力

You never know how hard families in poor countries work to get by

03

所以在這個基本面上，你給窮人加一點小額貸款嘱兼，幫他們啟動一些小生意国葬，你覺得有用么？

So on that basis, you can add a little bit of microcredit to help poor people start small businesses. Do you think that will help?

富國的人們芹壕，按部就班地上學(xué)汇四、畢業(yè)，加入公司哪雕，在老板的指揮下循規(guī)蹈矩地工作船殉，既不需要冒著風險去創(chuàng)業(yè)，也不需要獨自面對種種艱難險阻斯嚎，就能有多得多的收入利虫，享受高得多的生活水平。 People in rich countries can earn much more and enjoy a much higher standard of living by going to school, graduating, joining a company and doing what bosses tell them to do, without having to take risks to start a business or face hardships alone.

而全民創(chuàng)業(yè)的窮國的人們堡僻，哪怕用上吃奶的勁糠惫，變著花樣做生意，也難過好日子钉疫。 And people in poor countries where all people start their own businesses, even if they try their best to do business in different ways, are also unhappy with good times.

說到這兒硼讽，你會發(fā)現(xiàn)，我們對創(chuàng)業(yè)精神是不是有什么誤會牲阁？

At this point, do we have a misunderstanding about entrepreneurship?

是的固阁，有誤會。我們夸大了個體的創(chuàng)業(yè)精神的作用城菊。

Yes, there was a misunderstanding. We exaggerate the role of individual entrepreneurship.

相比個體的創(chuàng)業(yè)精神备燃，通過有效的組織和制度把人們的個體努力整合起來，形成強大的集團能力凌唬，才是一個國家真正的致富之道并齐。 Compared with individual entrepreneurship, the only way for a country to become rich is to integrate people's individual efforts through effective organizations and institutions to form powerful group capabilities.

為什么呢？因為這就是公司的力量客税，大公司的生產(chǎn)效率比一個個個體戶高多了况褪，國家致富要靠世界五百強的企業(yè)，而不是遍地的小作坊更耻。 Why is that? Because this is the power of the company, the production efficiency of large companies is much higher than that of individual enterprises, the country depends on the fortune 500 enterprises, not small workshops everywhere.

一家世界五百強產(chǎn)生的經(jīng)濟效益测垛，有時候比一個小窮國還高，真正是一企業(yè)抵一國

A fortune 500 company can generate more economic returns than a small poor country

全民創(chuàng)業(yè)不能讓窮國變成富國秧均，只有建立起一個個有競爭力的大公司赐纱，讓大部分人在里面發(fā)揮所長脊奋、獲得豐厚的勞務(wù)收益，才是實現(xiàn)共同富裕的正確之道疙描。

Entrepreneurship for all cannot turn poor countries into rich ones. Only by establishing large and competitive companies in which the majority of people can give full play to their strengths and get rich labor benefits is the right way to achieve common prosperity.

本文由 狐貍先森幾點鐘 原創(chuàng)，歡迎關(guān)注讶隐，帶你一起長知識

This article by fox sen several o 'clock original, welcome to pay attention to, take you with long knowledge

特別聲明：本文為網(wǎng)易自媒體平臺“網(wǎng)易號”作者上傳并發(fā)布起胰，僅代表該作者觀點。網(wǎng)易僅提供信息發(fā)布平臺巫延。

Special statement: This article is uploaded and published by the author of NetEase We-media platform "NetEase", and the views expressed herein are solely those of the author. NetEase only provides an information release platform.

打開網(wǎng)易新聞效五，閱讀體驗更佳

Open NetEase News, better reading experience