找工作有了一些進(jìn)展靠闭，論文數(shù)據(jù)收了一籮筐斗埂，所以可以得閑镣奋，繼續(xù)寫點(diǎn)不正經(jīng)的感悟啦搞乏，加油痹换！
先回顧下上篇的內(nèi)容-閱讀羅密歐與朱麗葉的意義是什么布近？
問題1：莎士比亞的語言, 和閱讀和寫作有什么關(guān)系举塔？
問題2：人物故事對我們感覺和控制情緒季率，有什么啟迪芬为？
繼續(xù)我們來問模闲，問題3：人物和命運(yùn)折射出的復(fù)雜兩難問題腾节，如何能解忘嫉？
3）Understand Human’s complexity, understand ourselves
這是我第一次去關(guān)注一個次要角色，弗里爾·勞倫斯禀倔，是這本書中一個非常有趣的人物榄融。弗里斯·勞倫斯像是一個會占卜的預(yù)言人，他的一些話總是暗中透露出了人物的命運(yùn)救湖。他也是一個像羅密歐的父親般的人愧杯，他知道羅密歐的小秘密，因為他知道羅密歐的沖動常向羅密歐提供建議（第3行）鞋既。他反對不受控制的激情和愛力九，宣揚(yáng)溫和適度的感情耍铜。然而，在羅密歐的要求下跌前，他仍然幫助羅密歐與朱麗葉迅速地結(jié)婚棕兼。事實上，他可以本來可以在行動羅密歐之前抵乓，有更多的勸導(dǎo)和忠告伴挚。
Besides Romeo , Friar Lawrence is the most interesting character in the book.Friar Lawrence is kind of predictive person as some of his words imply the character’s fate.He is a kind of father-like person to Romeo. He knows the little secret of Romeo and give advice to Romeo as he know Romeo’s impulsiveness.(Act 3 ) . He often speaks against the uncontrolled passion and love and he is definitely for moderation. However, under the request of Romeo,? he still helped Romeo and Juliet married. He could have asked Romeo to have more thoughts before action. Probably he did that also with the hope that the marriage would reslove the feud between two families ( Act 3, Scene 2).
不過，他并沒有想到婚姻會加速年輕戀人的悲劇灾炭。不管弗里爾·勞倫斯的忠告茎芋，羅密歐殺死了泰爾巴特，以報復(fù)他的朋友馬庫蒂奧的死亡蜈出。正因為如此田弥，他被王子（第3幕，場景2）驅(qū)逐出境铡原。他提出了假死亡計劃偷厦，不幸的是，羅密歐沒有得到這個計劃的消息燕刻，在朱麗葉的墳?zāi)骨白詺⒅黄谩Ｒ粋€有趣的問題是：弗里爾·勞倫斯，他是圣人還是自負(fù)的欺騙者酌儒？也許都是辜妓。書中的人物反映了我們的生活，與他相似忌怎，大多數(shù)社會人擁有雙重身份。弗里斯·勞倫斯就像所謂的“聰明的朋友”酪夷，帶著美好的希望榴啸，提供各種的建議，但也因為聽者缺乏判斷的能力晚岭，反而迷失了方向鸥印，好心人卻辦了“壞事”。
However, he did not expect that the marriage would speed up the tragedy of the young lovers. Regardless of Friar Lawrence’s advice , Romeo killed Tybalt to revenge for his friend Mercutio‘s death. Because of that,? he was banished by Prince( Act 3, Scene 2) .He came up the plan of fake death by giving the poison to juliet, but unfortunately Romeo did not get the message of this plan and accidentally self-killed himself around the tomb of Juliet.The question is : Is he a holy man or a deceitful schemer坦报？I think both.
The character in the book mirrors our life.Similar with him, most of social person holds dual identities.Friar Lawrence is like our so called "wise friend” or holy man.He hopes to make good for us , giving life advice but it turns out to be the sadness.
這其實是一個很有趣的議題库说。當(dāng)他人的建議和自我的觀點(diǎn)產(chǎn)生了沖突，聽或不聽片择？到底沖動和理性潜的，哪個才會帶我們走向真理？或者字管，我們只是在第二個想法之后采取行動啰挪？
不僅僅是主角信不，每個角色背后都有好多個話題可以被討論，我想這大概是文學(xué)大師的智慧之處亡呵。在帶著學(xué)生們咀嚼大師語言的同時抽活，我似乎還能看到這個世界的發(fā)生，看到每個人锰什，包括自我的復(fù)雜和兩難下硕。
This is actually a very interesting topic. When? else's advice conflict with self- , listen or not ? ?impulseness and rationalness, which will take us to the truth? Or do we just take action after the second thought?
Not just the protagonist, each character has a lot of topics behind? that can be discussed. I think this is probably the wisdom of the master of literature. While students chewing the language beauty, I seem to be able to see the occurrence of this world, see everyone, including the complexity and dilemma of the self at the same time.
以上均為“老夫聊發(fā)少年狂”，下次準(zhǔn)備認(rèn)真嚴(yán)肅寫點(diǎn)“教學(xué)法”汁胆，比如“Literature circle”+IT（科技輔助合作閱讀）梭姓，也就是我現(xiàn)在在做的Project！突然發(fā)現(xiàn)原來芬蘭做過類似的項目沦泌，大寫的驚訝臉糊昙，待我前去瞧瞧~
