Rise of the Robots 書(shū)評(píng)

Review by Edward Luce

Martin Ford has seen the future, and it doesn’t work. To be more precise, it generates wealth while obliterating demand for work. “Go West, young man”, was the career advice of the 19th century. Today’s equivalent is “get an engineering degree”. Alas, the latter is not as rewarding as the former. A third of Americans who graduated in STEM subjects (science, technology, engineering and maths) are in jobs that do not require any such degree. Up and down the US there are programmers working as fast-food servers. In the age of artificial intelligence, they will only drift further into obsolescence, says Ford.

Though Ford is a software entre-preneur, it is easy to dismiss his prognosis as the rantings of a latter-day Luddite. That is how many responded to his last book The Lights in the Tunnel (2009), which warned of a future in which even highly skilled occupations were vulnerable. Rise of the Robots is Ford’s answer to those critics. Unlike his first book, which was based on a thought experiment about tomorrow’s world, this one is grounded in today’s economy. It is well researched and disturbingly persuasive.

Ford’s contention is that our current technological revolution is different from earlier ones. Most economists would disagree. Their view is that today’s displacement is similar to the shift from agriculture to industry. Roughly half of Americans were employed on farms in 1900. Today they account for just 2 per cent of the workforce. Just as ex-farm labourers found work in the factories, so laid-off manufacturing workers were re-employed in the service industries. The IT revolution will be no different, economists say. It is all part of the natural cycle of creative destruction.

Ford finds two big holes in this Panglossian outlook. In contrast to earlier disruptions, which affected particular sectors of the economy, the effects of today’s revolution are “general-purpose”. From janitors to surgeons, virtually no jobs will be immune. Whether you are training to be an airline pilot, a retail assistant, a lawyer or a financial trader, labour-saving techno-logy is whittling your numbers — in some cases drastically so. In 2000, financial services employed 150,000 people in New York. By 2013 that had dropped to 100,000. Over the same time, Wall Street’s profits have soared. Up to 70 per cent of all equity trades are now executed by algorithms.

Or take social media. In 2006, Google bought YouTube for $1.65bn. It had 65 employees. The price amounted to $25m per employee. In 2012, Facebook bought Instagram, which had 13 employees, for $1bn. That came to $77m per employee. In 2014, it bought Whats-App, with 55 employees, for $19bn, at a staggering $345m per employee.

Such riches are little comfort to the thousands of engineers who cannot find work. Facebook’s data servers are now managed by Cyborg, a software programme. It requires one human technician for every 20,000 computers. Almost any job that involves sitting in front of a screen and manipulating information is either disappearing, or will do soon. Offshore workers in India are just as vulnerable as their counterparts in the west. China is the fastest- growing market for robots. No human can compete with the relentlessly falling costs of automation. Software can now drive cars and mark student essays.

Almost any job that involves sitting in front of a screen and manipulating information is threatened
But it is Ford’s second point that is the clincher. By skewing the gains of the new economy to a few, robots weaken the chief engine of growth — middle-class demand. As labour becomes uneconomic relative to machines, purchasing power diminishes. The US economy produces more than a third more today than it did in 1998 with the same-sized labour force and a significantly larger population. It still makes sense for people to obtain degrees. Graduates earn more than those who have completed only high school. But their returns are falling. The median pay for US entry-level graduates has fallen from $52,000 in 2000 to $46,000 today. It has stagnated for postgraduates. Education is by no means a catch-all solution, says Ford. Not everyone can get a PhD. Assuming that highly skilled jobs can take up the slack is “ana-logous to believing that, in the wake of the mechanisation of agriculture, the majority of displaced farm workers would be able to find jobs driving tractors,” he says.

What, then, is to be done? Peter Thiel, co-founder of PayPal, said: “We were promised flying cars, and instead what we got was 140 characters.” He was right of course; Twitter is not comparable to the invention of printing. Yet in another sense, he was wrong. We live in a world where everyone with a grievance wields more power in the palm of their hands than the computers that sent Apollo 14 into orbit. Ours is a super-democratic age. Ford does not believe technological progress can be stopped, nor that it would it be desirable to try. Yet the robot economy is inexorably squeezing our rewards in the jobs market. Ford’s answer is to pay every adult a minimum basic income — or a “citizen’s dividend”. There is logic to his remedy but not much realism. My forecast is that cars will fly before that happens.

最后編輯于
?著作權(quán)歸作者所有,轉(zhuǎn)載或內(nèi)容合作請(qǐng)聯(lián)系作者
  • 序言:七十年代末,一起剝皮案震驚了整個(gè)濱河市连锯,隨后出現(xiàn)的幾起案子犀呼,更是在濱河造成了極大的恐慌烛占,老刑警劉巖,帶你破解...
    沈念sama閱讀 222,681評(píng)論 6 517
  • 序言:濱河連續(xù)發(fā)生了三起死亡事件狸相,死亡現(xiàn)場(chǎng)離奇詭異,居然都是意外死亡,警方通過(guò)查閱死者的電腦和手機(jī)湖饱,發(fā)現(xiàn)死者居然都...
    沈念sama閱讀 95,205評(píng)論 3 399
  • 文/潘曉璐 我一進(jìn)店門(mén),熙熙樓的掌柜王于貴愁眉苦臉地迎上來(lái)杀捻,“玉大人井厌,你說(shuō)我怎么就攤上這事≈录ィ” “怎么了仅仆?”我有些...
    開(kāi)封第一講書(shū)人閱讀 169,421評(píng)論 0 362
  • 文/不壞的土叔 我叫張陵,是天一觀(guān)的道長(zhǎng)垢袱。 經(jīng)常有香客問(wèn)我墓拜,道長(zhǎng),這世上最難降的妖魔是什么请契? 我笑而不...
    開(kāi)封第一講書(shū)人閱讀 60,114評(píng)論 1 300
  • 正文 為了忘掉前任咳榜,我火速辦了婚禮,結(jié)果婚禮上爽锥,老公的妹妹穿的比我還像新娘涌韩。我一直安慰自己,他們只是感情好氯夷,可當(dāng)我...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 69,116評(píng)論 6 398
  • 文/花漫 我一把揭開(kāi)白布贸辈。 她就那樣靜靜地躺著,像睡著了一般。 火紅的嫁衣襯著肌膚如雪擎淤。 梳的紋絲不亂的頭發(fā)上奢啥,一...
    開(kāi)封第一講書(shū)人閱讀 52,713評(píng)論 1 312
  • 那天,我揣著相機(jī)與錄音嘴拢,去河邊找鬼桩盲。 笑死,一個(gè)胖子當(dāng)著我的面吹牛席吴,可吹牛的內(nèi)容都是我干的赌结。 我是一名探鬼主播,決...
    沈念sama閱讀 41,170評(píng)論 3 422
  • 文/蒼蘭香墨 我猛地睜開(kāi)眼孝冒,長(zhǎng)吁一口氣:“原來(lái)是場(chǎng)噩夢(mèng)啊……” “哼柬姚!你這毒婦竟也來(lái)了?” 一聲冷哼從身側(cè)響起庄涡,我...
    開(kāi)封第一講書(shū)人閱讀 40,116評(píng)論 0 277
  • 序言:老撾萬(wàn)榮一對(duì)情侶失蹤量承,失蹤者是張志新(化名)和其女友劉穎,沒(méi)想到半個(gè)月后穴店,有當(dāng)?shù)厝嗽跇?shù)林里發(fā)現(xiàn)了一具尸體撕捍,經(jīng)...
    沈念sama閱讀 46,651評(píng)論 1 320
  • 正文 獨(dú)居荒郊野嶺守林人離奇死亡,尸身上長(zhǎng)有42處帶血的膿包…… 初始之章·張勛 以下內(nèi)容為張勛視角 年9月15日...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 38,714評(píng)論 3 342
  • 正文 我和宋清朗相戀三年泣洞,在試婚紗的時(shí)候發(fā)現(xiàn)自己被綠了忧风。 大學(xué)時(shí)的朋友給我發(fā)了我未婚夫和他白月光在一起吃飯的照片。...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 40,865評(píng)論 1 353
  • 序言:一個(gè)原本活蹦亂跳的男人離奇死亡球凰,死狀恐怖狮腿,靈堂內(nèi)的尸體忽然破棺而出,到底是詐尸還是另有隱情呕诉,我是刑警寧澤蚤霞,帶...
    沈念sama閱讀 36,527評(píng)論 5 351
  • 正文 年R本政府宣布,位于F島的核電站义钉,受9級(jí)特大地震影響昧绣,放射性物質(zhì)發(fā)生泄漏。R本人自食惡果不足惜捶闸,卻給世界環(huán)境...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 42,211評(píng)論 3 336
  • 文/蒙蒙 一夜畴、第九天 我趴在偏房一處隱蔽的房頂上張望。 院中可真熱鬧删壮,春花似錦贪绘、人聲如沸。這莊子的主人今日做“春日...
    開(kāi)封第一講書(shū)人閱讀 32,699評(píng)論 0 25
  • 文/蒼蘭香墨 我抬頭看了看天上的太陽(yáng)。三九已至,卻和暖如春菱涤,著一層夾襖步出監(jiān)牢的瞬間苞也,已是汗流浹背。 一陣腳步聲響...
    開(kāi)封第一講書(shū)人閱讀 33,814評(píng)論 1 274
  • 我被黑心中介騙來(lái)泰國(guó)打工粘秆, 沒(méi)想到剛下飛機(jī)就差點(diǎn)兒被人妖公主榨干…… 1. 我叫王不留如迟,地道東北人。 一個(gè)月前我還...
    沈念sama閱讀 49,299評(píng)論 3 379
  • 正文 我出身青樓攻走,卻偏偏與公主長(zhǎng)得像殷勘,于是被迫代替她去往敵國(guó)和親。 傳聞我的和親對(duì)象是個(gè)殘疾皇子昔搂,可洞房花燭夜當(dāng)晚...
    茶點(diǎn)故事閱讀 45,870評(píng)論 2 361

推薦閱讀更多精彩內(nèi)容